- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,116
- Reaction score
- 33,462
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
apparently you have never heard of the Independent Panel Advisory Board.
I guess you could buy a condom without intending with putting it to use if your were a complete dweeb without the proper equipment to use it.
Here in Michigan we get a drivers license to drive the damn car on the roads. And to do that you need the license and proof of insurance to get the plate on the car that you are driving with that license on the roads.
This is not rocket science.
Actually you had to do some digging to find that. And even then it does not say what you THINK it says. All that says is that you are required to have proof of insurance on a vehicle that you are driving. No where does it say that you are required to provide proof when registering that vehicle. Note that it says "shall be furnished for each motor vehicle registered". Not something to the effect of "when registering".
Sorry but I have yet to see you say that you made a mistake or make an apology for that "mistake". And the fact that you just made the SAME arguement 4 posts before the one that I just quoted shows that you are stating falsehoods on purpose.
Right, not rocket science. You don't need insurance to get a license. I don't give a good god damn why you get the license...you don't need insurance to get it.
Apparently you do not know the meaning of the legal term REQUIRED.
Self-deprecation is a gradual thing...it does not respond well to coercion…today has been a turning point for Haymarket…hopefully..
This has been clarified already. Please go back and review.
From what I've seen, it seems to be you having trouble getting that down.
So you too do not know what the legal term REQUIRED means? Perhaps you two attended the same home school and that lesson was never covered?
Moderator's Warning: |
The Gallup poll shows lots of support for provisions of the law. Only 31% agree with the GOP position of repealing it.
Do all states require car insurance?
Those opposing me here should take note that when I posed the question I specially mentioned BOTH insurance as well as meeting financial responsibility with the state.
from my post #265
Yes, you drove your parents car and they paid for your coverage to do so. Your driving on the roads in that vehicle with insurance was indeed paid for.
You want examples of how slavery sacrifices all social freedom? Are you serious?
By "less regulation" I assume you mean more laws giving the unions advantages.Individual freedom can be split into two categories- economic freedom and social freedom. The definition of a conservative is someone who favors lower regulation of economic matters and higher regulation of social matters. The definition of a liberal is someone who favors more regulation of economic matters and less regulation of social matters. Obviously in the US neither side favors either total regulation or zero regulation in either sphere. There are some economic areas where liberals want less regulation and conservatives want more. For example, unions.
And there are some social issue where conservatives want less regulation and liberals more. For example guns. But, by and large, you find the liberal on the side of more economic regulation and less social regulation most often. For the economic side, you have environmental regulations, minimum wage, health care regulation, etc. For the social side you have the death penalty, abortion, birth control, separation of church and state, the use of torture, domestic spying, etc.
No, allowing slavery is "maxed out" sacrificing the rights of one group to favor another. There's no economic freedom there for the slaves.Allowing slavery is maxed out economic freedom.
Such a strong concept of property rights that one can own other human beings.
Government stays totally out of the way of business.
What economic freedom do slaves enjoy?On the other hand, it shows zero concern for the social freedom of the individual.
The slaves are totally oppressed. So, it's a very conservative phenomenon.
Apparently you do not know the meaning of the legal term REQUIRED.
Perhaps that is because your reading skills are not up to par?
Nah, if they had been home schooled chances are that they would be way too smart to waste large chunks of time in here arguing with progressive useful idiots. They'd be making far better use of their valuable time.
apparently you have never heard of the Independent Panel Advisory Board.
Would typing slower give you credibility where you have none? Sure type as slow as you want to.
Would typing slower prevent you from confusing one topic with a different topic? Sure type as slow as you want to.
Would typing slower give you knowledge that you fail to demonstrate? Sure type as slow as you want.
Would typing slower flesh out your silly drive by posts in which you say nothing of actual substance? Sure type as slow as you want.
Which means what? We're not going to misrepresent that agian are we? :coffeepap
I don't think we should misrepresent anything. That being said I do think to have effective change to the health care system there will be necessary rationing if people want to call it that.
So here goes. I SUPPORT RATIONING.
Is it true, that because the mandate portion has been labeled a "tax" by the Supreme Court, that 51 votes are needed to shoot down this bill?
Whether you supported it or not, this is not rationing. When you're poor, you don't what you want on demand. When you have insurance, you don't get everything you want paid for on demand. All the board does, as your insurance company does and as you do, is measure what treatemnts are effective and which ones they will pay for. No one is "rationed." Like with your insurance company, if you want more, you can buy more. It is dishonest to call this rationing.
I think that this board is so partisan that every word is seen as some sneak attack on their POV, which poisons, rather than encourages healthy debate.
I agree totally with this...and it seems to be getting worse lately...I guess due to presidential election year???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?