Science is one of the six religions in balance with Buddhism, I am, Hare Krishna, Islam and Christianity.Prove me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
Darwin was a prophet.Prove me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
Like the flat earth?, it is observable,
There could be something missing from that sentence.. In balance with what? Science in balance with Christianity?Science is one of the six religions in balance with Buddhism, I am, Hare Krishna, Islam and Christianity.
The earth is an oblate spheroid.Like the flat earth?
Oh Jesus, you're one of those people? No amount of reason can break through that much ignorance.Like the flat earth?
1. Science is a process, God is a subject - they're not even in the same domain, let alone direct opposites.Prove me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
Prove me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
Science is an approach to questions, not a deity. I think I just proved you wrongProve me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
We use science to show the Earth isn't flat.Like the flat earth?
They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
They have significant faith in it.
They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
Prove me wrong.
Ever been out to sea? You can easily observe that the Earth is round when out to sea.Like the flat earth?
Prove me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
What a load of hooey. Science describes the universe, it is not an act of faith, it is observable, replicable truth nothing more or less.
Prove me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
For the common man, especially those who incorporate their limited understanding of science into political arguments, the difference between "Science" and religion is negligible.
For these folks who understand little and can prove nothing, quoting the scientists is not different in any way from quoting prophets.
Let's pretend this is true...I'd much rather believe in a "god" that moves with each new finding and corrects itself over an invisible being that is said to be flawless but is obviously very flawed (according to the writings of ancient sheepherders).Prove me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
Like what?Except scientists have knowledge that prophets do not. So, a little different.
Like what?
Sure.Ever been out to sea? You can easily observe that the Earth is round when out to sea.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Can you please move to wherever it is your god lives and leave the earth to earthlings? It would be a much nicer place without your religious beliefs poisoning the atmosphere.Prove me wrong.
- They place it opposite from the actual God in discussion.
- They have significant faith in it.
- They think acquiring scientific knowledge is a goal in and of itself and they have no specific goal beyond it.
- Scientific knowledge gives their life meaning and gives them comfort at times of extreme stress the same way faith in God comforts a believer.
And you have looked so hard through the scriptures...Like everything. Prophets have never proven anything. Just men saying words based on superstition.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?