• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Say, has anyone heard from Anthony Fauci lately?

🤣

Was he wrong in promoting vaccines?

No.

Was he wrong in promoting social distancing?

No.

Was he wrong in promoting basic hygiene?

No.

Was he wrong in promoting self quarantine for the sick?

No.

Was he wrong in promoting masks when and where appropriate?

No.
Was he wrong in promoting vaccines?
Yes. The "vaccines" didn't do what they're supposed to do. So the definition of "vaccine" had to change.

Was he wrong in promoting social distancing?

Yes. Social distancing was made up garbage with no foundation in science.

Was he wrong in promoting basic hygiene?

No, but "washing your hands" isn't exactly setting the world on fire if we're expecting innovation.

Was he wrong in promoting self quarantine for the sick?

Yes, because he was also promoting herd immunity. You can't have herd immunity if everyone is isolating.

Was he wrong in promoting masks when and where appropriate?

He was against masks before he was for them but also the masks available to most of the public didn't do shit anyway.
 
Was he wrong in promoting vaccines?
Yes. The "vaccines" didn't do what they're supposed to do. So the definition of "vaccine" had to change.

Was he wrong in promoting social distancing?

Yes. Social distancing was made up garbage with no foundation in science.

Was he wrong in promoting basic hygiene?

No, but "washing your hands" isn't exactly setting the world on fire if we're expecting innovation.

Was he wrong in promoting self quarantine for the sick?

Yes, because he was also promoting herd immunity. You can't have herd immunity if everyone is isolating.

Was he wrong in promoting masks when and where appropriate?

He was against masks before he was for them but also the masks available to most of the public didn't do shit anyway.

Vaccines: Wrong. Vaccines saved lives, prevented hospitalization, etc.

Social distancing: Wrong. They were working with data they had.

Basic hygiene: Basic hygiene is basic.

Self Isolation:. Wrong. This is a basic concept in transmission control. The concept has existed since the time of the old testament.

Masks:. Wrong. It is known that masks help prevent transmission for sick to healthy. And the "He was against masks before he was for them" schtick is either ignorance or dishonesty.
 
I mean. How in the world are so many getting by without the insufferable a$$hole Fauci constantly in your grill?

He has been dispatched to Bush league JV status as Covid that never was as scary as he made it to be, is allowed to fade to black.

I don’t care to see or hear anything from little tyrant until the day he flies west.
———-


berman-fauci-730x0.jpg

Has anyone else noticed a strange lacuna in the COVID-19 media Force? As though a single voice with a million appearances on national television has suddenly gone silent? Actually, yes, someone has, but before we get there, let’s take a quick peek at the media page for Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) as of this morning.


Still living rent free in your head, he just got some curtains because he got tired of y’all trying to see him naked.
 
@Paradoxical

Post 42 *crickets*

You threw down the challenge...where's your response?
 
Aerosol COVID goes right through masks. How many times do I have to tell everyone this? It takes only about a thousand to infect someone.

@_@ You responded? 😄

That sentence alone proves you still dont understand anything about the 'mechanics' of it.

And yet, since I answered your challenge above....nothing but *crickets*.

Coughs and sneezes? What a frigging joke. Only a fool would cough or sneeze at someone. This is why you cannot show ONE state that did better than another BECAUSE of mask-wearing.....not ONE! IF masks worked we should expect EVERY single state that mandated the wearing of them to be demonstrably better than those that didn't and yet it is just the opposite.

Here you go, since you're "available". Previously posted:

After 2 years, it's stunningly sad that this kind of ignorance is still around.

Coughs and sneezes? What a frigging joke. Only a fool would cough or sneeze at someone. This is why you cannot show ONE state that did better than another BECAUSE of mask-wearing.....not ONE! IF masks worked we should expect EVERY single state that mandated the wearing of them to be demonstrably better than those that didn't and yet it is just the opposite.
Here you go, since you're "available". Previously posted:

After 2 years, it's stunningly sad that this kind of ignorance is still around.​
Masks dont necessarily stop viral particles...they stop the larger aerosol droplets that CARRY the viral particles. They help limit the spread of the viral particles by retaining the aerosol droplets from getting thru or from traveling as far. They arent a standalone measure, they go with 6 foot SD, handwashing, not touching your face, etc. All these things combined help to reduce the spread of the virus. It's incomprehensible to me that people just cannot grasp such a basic thing.​
The aerosol droplets are the vehicles that carry the virus...the more the viral particles are restricted, the fewer people they can reach and infect. Without the droplets to carry them...or less of the droplets...the harder it is for them to travel anywhere. The different types of masks (cloth, paper, filtered, etc) all vary in the size of droplets they let thru.​

Now do you get it? Please post something that shows you do.
 
@_@ You responded? 😄

That sentence alone proves you still dont understand anything about the 'mechanics' of it.

And yet, since I answered your challenge above....nothing but *crickets*.



Here you go, since you're "available". Previously posted:

After 2 years, it's stunningly sad that this kind of ignorance is still around.


Here you go, since you're "available". Previously posted:

After 2 years, it's stunningly sad that this kind of ignorance is still around.​
Masks dont necessarily stop viral particles...they stop the larger aerosol droplets that CARRY the viral particles. They help limit the spread of the viral particles by retaining the aerosol droplets from getting thru or from traveling as far. They arent a standalone measure, they go with 6 foot SD, handwashing, not touching your face, etc. All these things combined help to reduce the spread of the virus. It's incomprehensible to me that people just cannot grasp such a basic thing.​
The aerosol droplets are the vehicles that carry the virus...the more the viral particles are restricted, the fewer people they can reach and infect. Without the droplets to carry them...or less of the droplets...the harder it is for them to travel anywhere. The different types of masks (cloth, paper, filtered, etc) all vary in the size of droplets they let thru.​

Now do you get it? Please post something that shows you do.
Seriously: don’t bother responding to ignorant posts. Paradoxical still think virions travel alone without large droplets as taxis.
Just plain dumb.
 
Back
Top Bottom