I don't see many claiming she is irrelevant. Stupid, yes. Corrupt, yes. A poor speaker, yes. A quitter, yes. A hopeful for 2012, yes. Irrelevant, not so much.
You see threads about her since she is an easy conservative to make fun of and score points off of.
If that's the only reason why she's relevant, then she's just as relevant as Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly. Who are not relevant at all.
That liberals keep bringing her up implies one of two things:
1. They are scared of her (as in, scared that she might become President or something)
2. They can't find a more relevant target
Sarah Baracuda, who can't tell you what she reads or name a founding father and faked her pregnancy, is relevant because she is dangerous. Imagine her as POTUS or VP. Scary. Imagine her negotiating with the leaders of N Korea, China, Iran, Venezuala (sp?). They'd listen to her for 5 minutes and determine that if America is stupid enough to elect an idiot like her then we are probably weak enough to be invaded ourselves.
THAT is why she is relevant.
And I say anyone promoting her, supporting her and voting for her does not have the good of the country in mind.
So, does anybody here actually, truly believe that Sarah Palin doesn't know about any founding fathers? Because that would speak a lot more of the intelligence of the person who believes that than the intelligence of Palin herself.
Kind of like the "Africa is a country" hoax.
Faked her pregnancy? Oh, you're one of those.
Okay, then:
Obama was born in Kenya. Did you know that? :2wave:
One of what? Apparently another stupid story I missed.
Problem is the "Africa is a country" hoax and this edited video are no different in scope than her real actions
such as not being able to name a newspaper she reads
or claiming that seeing Russia from parts of Alaska gives her a leg up on foreign affairs. There's no difference whatsoever between truth and satire. This is most likely a vexing problem for comedians because satire is supposed to be more ridiculous than truth.
Very different, actually.
I do not read newspapers or magazines, and yet am probably one of the more informed people in the country.
Are you seriously trying to claim that any of this is on the same scope as thinking that Africa is a country? Because you must be trying really hard to make yourself believe that if you actually do.
Sarah Baracuda
Sarah Baracuda
who can't tell you what she reads or name a founding father and faked her pregnancy,
That depends. Do you feel that people who don't believe in Creationism should just stop arguing against it every time the debate comes up to teach it in our schools?
This reminds me of Obama saying he's been to all 57 states.
Who are these people? LOL
That video was edited, poorly. It's comedy.
YouTube- Beck: Who's Your Favorite Founder? Palin: All Of 'Em
There's her real response.
And this is relevant how? I swear I heard her talk about George Washington, so I don't get the thread title?That depends. Do you feel that people who don't believe in Creationism should just stop arguing against it every time the debate comes up to teach it in our schools?
Right, but (and I'm not trying to be rude) yours was 7 minutes long. I posted for the sake of brevity.
And who brought Palin up here?
Based on your thread title I would say you have less intelligence than Palin for believing that she "can't" name one of the Framers.:lol:Sarah Palin Can't Name A Founding Father
I don't see many claiming she is irrelevant. Stupid, yes. Corrupt, yes. A poor speaker, yes. A quitter, yes. A hopeful for 2012, yes. Irrelevant, not so much.
You see threads about her since she is an easy conservative to make fun of and score points off of.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?