- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Wrong the courts have issued rulings which you support, telling people they have to associate and serve people they don't wish to.
Then buy a deserted island, move there and crown yourself king.
Until then, you'll obey the laws of the land, or pay the penalty for breaking them
1.)Wrong the courts have issued rulings which you support, telling people they have to associate and serve people they don't wish to. The two cases being discussed here, the Wedding cake case and the photography case. Those rulings are forcible association and servitude.
There are no islands that are for sale and have a sovereign title go with them. Its off planet if I want that and even that would be disputed. I have looked into this quite extensively. I would need to quite literally steal an island. As far as the laws and this being a nation of laws, sorry buddy but that is no longer true and has not been true for some time. Its whatever you can get away with here. Laws are followed only when convenient here especially by the government.
Then buy a deserted island, move there and crown yourself king.
Until then, you'll obey the laws of the land, or pay the penalty for breaking them
There are no islands that are for sale and have a sovereign title go with them. Its off planet if I want that and even that would be disputed. I have looked into this quite extensively. I would need to quite literally steal an island. As far as the laws and this being a nation of laws, sorry buddy but that is no longer true and has not been true for some time. Its whatever you can get away with here. Laws are followed only when convenient here especially by the government.
Wrong. Individuals are free to associate (or not) with whom they please. Public accomodations are not.
It's my right as American citizen to disagree and stand against your perverted "morality"
First Amendment >
Just invest in this:
"The ultimate goal," Friedman says, "is to open a frontier for experimenting with new ideas for government." This translates into the founding of ideologically oriented micro-states on the high seas, a kind of floating petri dish for implementing policies that libertarians, stymied by indifference at the voting booths, have been unable to advance: no welfare, looser building codes, no minimum wage, and few restrictions on weapons.
Milton Friedman’s Grandson to Build Floating Libertarian Nation
Somewhere, the world's tiniest violin is being played just for you
nope
there are laws, rules and rights that businesses ,must follow and not infringe one's rights
if one isnt civil enough to follow those laws, rules and not infringe on those rights one has the freedom not to open a public business
so like i said nobody is telling you to serve or associate with anybody
pretty basic
Business especially one man business it does come down to freedom of association and involuntary servitude, whether you like it or admit it or not. If I own a taco wagon I cant tell people I don't like to go pound sand I am required by court ruling to associate with and serve them whether I choose to or not. I should I could not serve them but I would be sued and put out of business. An individual business person in NOT free to pursue their chosen business and associate with those they choose.
:lamo That's why I am building a rocket ship. The farther I get away the less likely the morons will take the time and energy to follow. The Jupiter orbit is a very good bet right now. Working out the shielding problems. Get that licked and I am out of here.
Yes it is and it is also my right to laugh my ass at you.
Like I said, I did extensive research into this. Those are unviable. Why because the United States and a few other countries claims the right to inspect any vessel on the high seas. Especially those without a recognized flag. Those nations would be considered vessels. Unless they were very well armed, they would be in even less of a position then if they were a flagged ship.
Your dead wrong. See post 232. The recent court rulings in the wedding cake and photography session prove you wrong.
You can own a taco stand and refuse to sell tacos to whomever you want, but not if you choose to operate it as a public accommodation.
If you don't like the laws, then you can go pound sand.
Okay fine build a rocket ship to the moon, pluto or yo Uranus.
Because you can't debate the issue
:mrgreen: My thoughts exactly.
You hate fags and think that is right. So what is to debate?
Maybe it's just me, but I just can't fathom why ANYONE in this country would have to fight for rights afforded to us ALL by the Constitution. It shouldn't even be a question, much less a debate or legal fight.
But like I said, maybe its just me....
That's a lie and a smear
Quote me where I said " I hate &^%$". If you read my post history, you will see that I say the exact opposite
Like I said. You are unable to debate the issue
no they dont they prove me 100% right,
for the photographer the courts enforced the rules that already exists not my fault or the courts fault those photographers were to stupid to follow them
they CHOSE to get in business and they CHOSE to break the law. Nobody forced them to get in business and break the law. You are factually wrong
the bakers case is even better
these idiots did the same as the photographer but no courts even ruled on anythign yet. Because the story spread like wildfire and it SEEMS they posted racists and bigotedposts on facebook people boycotted them and they lost over 50% of thier business so they decided to do a private practice instead of public accommodation
both these cases prove me 100% right
there are laws, rules and rights that businesses must follow and not infringe one's rights
if one isnt civil enough to follow those laws, rules and not infringe on those rights one has the freedom not to open a public business
so like i said nobody is telling you to serve or associate with anybody
pretty basic
In the mean time how are you going to live in reality?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?