• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Russia Collusion was a hoax" was a hoax

That's REEEEALLLLY desperate.
 
That's REEEEALLLLY desperate.

Like, this time for sure, for reals, lmfao.

It’s a cult. Conspiracy theorists. Kool-aid drinkers.

I love comedy.
 
The Russia collusion hoax was always a hoax made up by Christopher Steele, the FBI, CIA and Hillary Clinton. At least nobody was physically harmed by it which can happen when you get on the wrong side of the Arkansas mafia.
 
The Russia collusion hoax was always a hoax made up by Christopher Steele, the FBI, CIA and Hillary Clinton. At least nobody was physically harmed by it which can happen when you get on the wrong side of the Arkansas mafia.
Trump made up the hoax.
 
I knew this ages ago. When the right starts screeching "hoax" on no evidence whatsoever, they're just repeating lies until people believe them.
 
The words "Russia Russia Russia" casts a magic spell over people that removes all sense of right and wrong and prepares them to accept without question lies from Trump.
 
The Russia collusion hoax was always a hoax made up by Christopher Steele, the FBI, CIA and Hillary Clinton. At least nobody was physically harmed by it which can happen when you get on the wrong side of the Arkansas mafia.
Was this before or after you evaded your taxes?
 
The Russia collusion hoax was always a hoax made up by Christopher Steele, the FBI, CIA and Hillary Clinton. At least nobody was physically harmed by it which can happen when you get on the wrong side of the Arkansas mafia.

Keep the lulz coming, we like a dose of fantasy in our day...
 
How is the truth desperate?
It's called cherry-picking.

You are trying to justify a massive, multi-year hoax on one small item found years after the fact, if it's even a valid lead.

I mean unless you're a republican.
I'm not, so what's your point?

Every one of your accusations is a confession.
 
Keeps getting proven over and over again.



Its paywalled.

But the Axios article on it makes the point that the Trump campaign did not know this guy was a Russian national.
Not sure if the Washington Post article says it.

Kind of tough to conspire with somebody if you don't know your're conspiring with somebody.

Like many conspiracy theories, the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory lacks facts that it actually happened.

 
Also.. This just in. Bush lied about WMD!!
Dems to draft retroactive impeachment articles on Trump AND BUSH!!
LAFFRIOT
 
It's called cherry-picking.

You are trying to justify a massive, multi-year hoax on one small item found years after the fact, if it's even a valid lead.


I'm not, so what's your point?

Every one of your accusations is a confession.
It wasn't a hoax. JUst because you're ignoring the evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen.
 
I've already commented about this in another thread. A straw purchase for a Russian citizen.

Its paywalled.

But the Axios article on it makes the point that the Trump campaign did not know this guy was a Russian national.
Not sure if the Washington Post article says it.

Kind of tough to conspire with somebody if you don't know your're conspiring with somebody.

Like many conspiracy theories, the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory lacks facts that it actually happened.

 
It wasn't a hoax. JUst because you're ignoring the evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen.
What facts? I have only seen innuendo.

There was a multi-year FBI investigation, the Mueller team. After over 2000 hours of interviews and 1.5 Million documents, the Mueller report exonerated Trump of colluding with Russia. The Mueller was, quoting a law professor here, "an exoneration" of collusion with Russia. The exact wording was

[T]he investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.​
The facts are that there
  1. Was a misinformation document, the Steele Dossier
  2. There were fraudulently obtained FISA warrants
  3. There was an FBI investigation in great depth
  4. Following all of the above, there was an exoneration.
Those are facts. what have you got?
 
What facts? I have only seen innuendo.

There was a multi-year FBI investigation, the Mueller team. After over 2000 hours of interviews and 1.5 Million documents, the Mueller report exonerated Trump of colluding with Russia. The Mueller was, quoting a law professor here, "an exoneration" of collusion with Russia. The exact wording was

[T]he investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.​
The facts are that there
  1. Was a misinformation document, the Steele Dossier
  2. There were fraudulently obtained FISA warrants
  3. There was an FBI investigation in great depth
  4. Following all of the above, there was an exoneration.
Those are facts. what have you got?
Had Trump and his cronies said that the Mueller investigation found no credible evidence that he colluded with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election, that would have been correct.

But that is NOT what he, and all his cult claimed. Trump has perpetually claimed that the entire investigation was a hoax; russia never attempted to interfere on his behalf and there should have been no investigation at all. THAT was his claim of a hoax and continues to be at present. And that is a flat lie. If you need a recitation of the uncontroverted facts confirming why the investigation was necessary, and those who were convicted as a result of the investigation, you know where to find it.

And never mind that Trump also lied and said the Mueller report exonerated him of any effort at obstruction. Despite the fact Mueller testified under oath that the report absolutely and unequivocally did NOT exonerate Trump on this issue, he continues to claim that to this day. As do his lemmings.
 
Its paywalled.

But the Axios article on it makes the point that the Trump campaign did not know this guy was a Russian national.
Not sure if the Washington Post article says it.

Kind of tough to conspire with somebody if you don't know your're conspiring with somebody.

Like many conspiracy theories, the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory lacks facts that it actually happened.

So will you say the same thing about FTX and the Democrats or will that be different?
 
Had Trump and his cronies said that the Mueller investigation found no credible evidence that he colluded with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election, that would have been correct.

This is true.

And Durham investigation has been showing there was no credible evidence to even investigate the allegation.

But that is NOT what he, and all his cult claimed. Trump has perpetually claimed that the entire investigation was a hoax; russia never attempted to interfere on his behalf and there should have been no investigation at all. THAT was his claim of a hoax and continues to be at present. And that is a flat lie. If you need a recitation of the uncontroverted facts confirming why the investigation was necessary, and those who were convicted as a result of the investigation, you know where to find it.

The allegation that caused such controversy, was the allegation that Trunp conspired with Russia in those efforts.
And never mind that Trump also lied and said the Mueller report exonerated him of any effort at obstruction. Despite the fact Mueller testified under oath that the report absolutely and unequivocally did NOT exonerate Trump on this issue, he continues to claim that to this day. As do his lemmings.

The argument of Mueller was that Trump could not be charged as president.
Well...? The fact that he has not been charged with obstruction since leaving office shows how weak the allegations were.
Exoneration.
 
What facts? I have only seen innuendo.

There was a multi-year FBI investigation, the Mueller team. After over 2000 hours of interviews and 1.5 Million documents, the Mueller report exonerated Trump of colluding with Russia. The Mueller was, quoting a law professor here, "an exoneration" of collusion with Russia. The exact wording was

[T]he investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.​
The facts are that there
  1. Was a misinformation document, the Steele Dossier
  2. There were fraudulently obtained FISA warrants
  3. There was an FBI investigation in great depth
  4. Following all of the above, there was an exoneration.
Those are facts. what have you got?

Mueller did not exonerate Trump, Mueller respected and followed the OLC memo, but he never stated Trump was exonerated.
 
Had Trump and his cronies said that the Mueller investigation found no credible evidence that he colluded with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election, that would have been correct.

But that is NOT what he, and all his cult claimed. Trump has perpetually claimed that the entire investigation was a hoax; russia never attempted to interfere on his behalf and there should have been no investigation at all. THAT was his claim of a hoax and continues to be at present. And that is a flat lie. If you need a recitation of the uncontroverted facts confirming why the investigation was necessary, and those who were convicted as a result of the investigation, you know where to find it.

And never mind that Trump also lied and said the Mueller report exonerated him of any effort at obstruction. Despite the fact Mueller testified under oath that the report absolutely and unequivocally did NOT exonerate Trump on this issue, he continues to claim that to this day. As do his lemmings.
that does not matter one wit... russia interfering with our elections is diabolical , no doubt, but no one has proven TRump and his administration colluded, conspired , whatever with them in any way.

so you know what else is evil and stupid? taking 6 YEARS to prove exactly nothing with never a apology or anything for it. THAT is what the dems , the FBI and the rest of the bureaucracy did.

you can try to defend that any way you want, but they are wrong for at least that!

of course Trump denies they colluded.. its true and he is a politician... politicians don;t tell their crowds "oh well they never found any evidence i colluded wi.." BS.

ANY of them would say "i nor my administration never colluded with Russia", so skip the diatribe about exactness of what was said.

what happened was, they proved NOTHING , yet raked him over the coals for 6 years about it FOR POLITICAL purposes.

In that they are just as bad as russia... but Russia is SUPPOSED to be our enemy, as they have chosen to be.... not one of our own political parties.

so NOW, if they cannot indict and prove guilt for the BS they have him up for there now, well then **** all dems.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom