- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 83,693
- Reaction score
- 58,394
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Keeps getting proven over and over again.
That's REEEEALLLLY desperate.
Trump made up the hoax.The Russia collusion hoax was always a hoax made up by Christopher Steele, the FBI, CIA and Hillary Clinton. At least nobody was physically harmed by it which can happen when you get on the wrong side of the Arkansas mafia.
Was this before or after you evaded your taxes?The Russia collusion hoax was always a hoax made up by Christopher Steele, the FBI, CIA and Hillary Clinton. At least nobody was physically harmed by it which can happen when you get on the wrong side of the Arkansas mafia.
That's REEEEALLLLY desperate.
How is the truth desperate?That's REEEEALLLLY desperate.
The Russia collusion hoax was always a hoax made up by Christopher Steele, the FBI, CIA and Hillary Clinton. At least nobody was physically harmed by it which can happen when you get on the wrong side of the Arkansas mafia.
It's called cherry-picking.How is the truth desperate?
I'm not, so what's your point?I mean unless you're a republican.
Keeps getting proven over and over again.
It wasn't a hoax. JUst because you're ignoring the evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen.It's called cherry-picking.
You are trying to justify a massive, multi-year hoax on one small item found years after the fact, if it's even a valid lead.
I'm not, so what's your point?
Every one of your accusations is a confession.
Its paywalled.
But the Axios article on it makes the point that the Trump campaign did not know this guy was a Russian national.
Not sure if the Washington Post article says it.
Kind of tough to conspire with somebody if you don't know your're conspiring with somebody.
Like many conspiracy theories, the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory lacks facts that it actually happened.
GOP operative convicted in scheme to funnel Russian money into Trump campaign
Benton, the husband of Rand Paul's niece and a veteran GOP staffer, faces up to 20 years in prison, but plans to appeal.www.axios.com
What facts? I have only seen innuendo.It wasn't a hoax. JUst because you're ignoring the evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Their invested deeply in the lie too deeply to ever admit they were wrong.It wasn't a hoax. JUst because you're ignoring the evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Had Trump and his cronies said that the Mueller investigation found no credible evidence that he colluded with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election, that would have been correct.What facts? I have only seen innuendo.
There was a multi-year FBI investigation, the Mueller team. After over 2000 hours of interviews and 1.5 Million documents, the Mueller report exonerated Trump of colluding with Russia. The Mueller was, quoting a law professor here, "an exoneration" of collusion with Russia. The exact wording was
[T]he investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.The facts are that there
Those are facts. what have you got?
- Was a misinformation document, the Steele Dossier
- There were fraudulently obtained FISA warrants
- There was an FBI investigation in great depth
- Following all of the above, there was an exoneration.
So will you say the same thing about FTX and the Democrats or will that be different?Its paywalled.
But the Axios article on it makes the point that the Trump campaign did not know this guy was a Russian national.
Not sure if the Washington Post article says it.
Kind of tough to conspire with somebody if you don't know your're conspiring with somebody.
Like many conspiracy theories, the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory lacks facts that it actually happened.
GOP operative convicted in scheme to funnel Russian money into Trump campaign
Benton, the husband of Rand Paul's niece and a veteran GOP staffer, faces up to 20 years in prison, but plans to appeal.www.axios.com
So will you say the same thing about FTX and the Democrats or will that be different?
Had Trump and his cronies said that the Mueller investigation found no credible evidence that he colluded with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election, that would have been correct.
But that is NOT what he, and all his cult claimed. Trump has perpetually claimed that the entire investigation was a hoax; russia never attempted to interfere on his behalf and there should have been no investigation at all. THAT was his claim of a hoax and continues to be at present. And that is a flat lie. If you need a recitation of the uncontroverted facts confirming why the investigation was necessary, and those who were convicted as a result of the investigation, you know where to find it.
And never mind that Trump also lied and said the Mueller report exonerated him of any effort at obstruction. Despite the fact Mueller testified under oath that the report absolutely and unequivocally did NOT exonerate Trump on this issue, he continues to claim that to this day. As do his lemmings.
What facts? I have only seen innuendo.
There was a multi-year FBI investigation, the Mueller team. After over 2000 hours of interviews and 1.5 Million documents, the Mueller report exonerated Trump of colluding with Russia. The Mueller was, quoting a law professor here, "an exoneration" of collusion with Russia. The exact wording was
[T]he investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.The facts are that there
Those are facts. what have you got?
- Was a misinformation document, the Steele Dossier
- There were fraudulently obtained FISA warrants
- There was an FBI investigation in great depth
- Following all of the above, there was an exoneration.
that does not matter one wit... russia interfering with our elections is diabolical , no doubt, but no one has proven TRump and his administration colluded, conspired , whatever with them in any way.Had Trump and his cronies said that the Mueller investigation found no credible evidence that he colluded with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election, that would have been correct.
But that is NOT what he, and all his cult claimed. Trump has perpetually claimed that the entire investigation was a hoax; russia never attempted to interfere on his behalf and there should have been no investigation at all. THAT was his claim of a hoax and continues to be at present. And that is a flat lie. If you need a recitation of the uncontroverted facts confirming why the investigation was necessary, and those who were convicted as a result of the investigation, you know where to find it.
And never mind that Trump also lied and said the Mueller report exonerated him of any effort at obstruction. Despite the fact Mueller testified under oath that the report absolutely and unequivocally did NOT exonerate Trump on this issue, he continues to claim that to this day. As do his lemmings.