• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rush Limbaugh Won... Obama-Alinsky Zero

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Long, long, long before The Tea Party... Rush Limbaugh set the stage. He, like many knew what Hope & Change meant... and he was on the money... in every way. There's no denying it.

Try as they may, Obama and his Journolists tried to isolate and destroy Rush with Alinsky's Rule #12. It is now the epic fail and should be the feature on fail.org

Thanks Rush & Thanks to a sober electorate. It's merely the beginning.


.
 
Damn and you accuse liberals of having a Messiah.

Rush isn't a Messiah, he is the premier voice of Conservatism nationwide. It's why Obama tried to Alinsky #12 him. They tried to take him down with their Journolist allies, and failed. Remember they tied to paint him as the Republican Leader? Of course not.

Once it became obvious Rush was right, the Tea Party emerged. Make no mistake, Rush brought focus to Obama and opened a nationwide discussion about wanting Obama's socialist policies to fail.

Make no mistake, Rush played a huge role in this victory.



Haymerket,

OK, he got hooked on addictive drugs from a back problem, but he isn't a KKK member, didn't drive off a bridge and abandon the passenger as two of the most historic Dems have done.

.
 
I find it hilarious how Alinsky is so much better know by the right than the left, but the right always claim the left is using him.
 
I find it hilarious how Alinsky is so much better know by the right than the left, but the right always claim the left is using him.
Obama uses him, Obama used to teach classes on him, who do the liberals rally around? Obama.
 
I find it hilarious how Alinsky is so much better know by the right than the left, but the right always claim the left is using him.

The left who have power are using Alinsky. No one is saying all the sheep are.
 

If he was "the premier voice of Conservatism nationwide.", then wouldn't that in fact be him leading the Republicans?

Otherwise, who is he playing Press Secretary to?




Purrrrrs
 
Last edited:
Perhaps should Rush should make a serious run as a third party candidate for President in 2012. He could do it in between his periodic pleasure "visits" to Costa Rica.
 
I find it hilarious how Alinsky is so much better know by the right than the left, but the right always claim the left is using him.

Why is it strange that the left is largely ignorant?


.
 
If he was "the premier voice of Conservatism nationwide.", then wouldn't that in fact be him leading the Republicans?

Otherwise, who is he playing Press Secretary to?




Purrrrrs

He's not an elected official, but a voice in the free market. He does have an impact, a huge one, as we saw this past week.

His impact became even greater thanks to Obama and his crew elevating him, constantly talking about him, and trying to bring him down using Ainsky's Rule #12. That bomb done blewed up in their faces. He's still standing... Obama and his Trons are licking their very deep wounds and trying to find their body politic parts scattered about the nation.

.
 
Last edited:
Why is it strange that the left is largely ignorant?



.

Why is it that there is a gross misuse of the word IGNORANT in these discussions? The actual meaning of the term is one who lacks knowledge and who has not been informed about a topic or issue. But far too often it is used as a club here to simply attack somebody who agrees with a position opposite of theirs.

Is it so difficult to comprehend that someone can read your position, can understand your position, has thought about your position and then utterly and completely rejects your position? That does not make them IGNORANT. It simply makes them disagree with you. The conceit here is that those who use the word somehow infer that if that stupid cretin only knew what they knew then there would be no disagreement. And that conceit should not be tolerated.
 
Such a shame that we suffer all the fallout from Democrats and Republicans fighting for power. No matter if Rush or Obama come out on top, we come out on the bottom.
 

That didn't address my point at all.
 
 
Last edited:
Perhaps should Rush should make a serious run as a third party candidate for President in 2012.

We don't need no stinkin' third party.
That would be dem's dream.
 

It's not about Limbaugh or any of the other right wingers. It's about susceptible, gullible people desperately seeking simple answers to complex issues.

ricksfolly
 

As a fiscal conservative, I take offense at Rush being referred to as my voice.
 
It's not about Limbaugh or any of the other right wingers. It's about susceptible, gullible people desperately seeking simple answers to complex issues.

ricksfolly

Talk about gullible, what about the ones who fell for The One and voted for him in '08.
Many of us knew what he was all about, but others just liked the sound of hope and change.
Some are probably wishing they had listened to Rush, Hannity and others who were trying to warn them.
 
And what is your point then?

.

Either by your description he is the leader or the mouthpiece for the leader of the GOP. Which is it?
 
Either by your description he is the leader or the mouthpiece for the leader of the GOP. Which is it?

Alinsky types are always looking for a leader to target. It drives them crazy that no one will say "yea, he's the leader of the rep. party" or "yea, she's the leader of the Tea Party."
They don't need or want leaders but rules for radicals calls for a target, so liberals just keep asking.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…