• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rush Limbaugh Won... Obama-Alinsky Zero

Alinsky types are always looking for a leader to target. It drives them crazy that no one will say "yea, he's the leader of the rep. party" or "yea, she's the leader of the Tea Party."
They don't need or want leaders but rules for radicals calls for a target, so liberals just keep asking.

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl


I see. It's top secret. Good plan. :mrgreen:
 
Rush isn't a Messiah, he is the premier voice of Conservatism nationwide. It's why Obama tried to Alinsky #12 him. They tried to take him down with their Journolist allies, and failed. Remember they tied to paint him as the Republican Leader? Of course not.
No, Limbaugh was doing the Alinsky #12, not the other way around.

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
 
Why is it that there is a gross misuse of the word IGNORANT in these discussions? The actual meaning of the term is one who lacks knowledge and who has not been informed about a topic or issue. But far too often it is used as a club here to simply attack somebody who agrees with a position opposite of theirs.

Is it so difficult to comprehend that someone can read your position, can understand your position, has thought about your position and then utterly and completely rejects your position? That does not make them IGNORANT. It simply makes them disagree with you. The conceit here is that those who use the word somehow infer that if that stupid cretin only knew what they knew then there would be no disagreement. And that conceit should not be tolerated.

Dude, did you even read the post before your head exploded with rage?

"I find it hilarious how Alinsky is so much better know by the right than the left"

He was talking about actual ignorance, as stated by Redress. When someone doesn't know about Alinsky, it's entirely correct to say they are ignorant about it. It's not meant to be a club, but a statement of fact.

What was it you were saying about conceit?
 
Why is it that there is a gross misuse of the word IGNORANT in these discussions? The actual meaning of the term is one who lacks knowledge and who has not been informed about a topic or issue. But far too often it is used as a club here to simply attack somebody who agrees with a position opposite of theirs.

Is it so difficult to comprehend that someone can read your position, can understand your position, has thought about your position and then utterly and completely rejects your position? That does not make them IGNORANT. It simply makes them disagree with you. The conceit here is that those who use the word somehow infer that if that stupid cretin only knew what they knew then there would be no disagreement. And that conceit should not be tolerated.

Amen!! Disagreeing with you doesn't make someone ignorant. It makes them capable of independent thought. As frustrating as I find some of what passes for political "thought" these days, I hope we never reach the point where everyone agrees on everything. How boring and culturally stagnant would that be?
 
Dude, did you even read the post before your head exploded with rage?

"I find it hilarious how Alinsky is so much better know by the right than the left"

He was talking about actual ignorance, as stated by Redress. When someone doesn't know about Alinsky, it's entirely correct to say they are ignorant about it. It's not meant to be a club, but a statement of fact.

What was it you were saying about conceit?

When you're a leftwing mouthfoamer, it takes over your mind.

Foaming+At+The+Mouth.jpg
 
As a fiscal conservative, I take offense at Rush being referred to as my voice.
Take offense all you like, but YOU and your fiscal conservative dreams ride on his coattails, for he is the one that took on Obama, making failure of his socialist dreams/policies a national discussion.

It is Rush who dissected and dissects Obama's charge to socialism and brings attention to what he and his pack of Radikals have foisted upon the nation. It is he that takes on the Journolists Propaganda Machine in an effort to restore both fiscal and social conservatism.

You may piss in his face, but without him you and your fiscal conservative dreams would be screwed. Rush set the stage for the Tea Party (over decades I might add), and my bet is a large portion of the movement that is in the process of saving America from Obama and the Radikal Left are Rush inspired to some degree.

I wonder why nobody has polled to find out what influence he has... but that Obama targeted him says volumes.


Either by your description he is the leader or the mouthpiece for the leader of the GOP. Which is it?
He certainly filled a leadership vacuum after Obama was elected, as the R's were acting as if Jesse Jackson had cut their nuts out and the president targeted Rush for destruction. Rush is also the premier spokesman for conservatism in the nation... for more than a couple decades.


No, Limbaugh was doing the Alinsky #12, not the other way around.
ROTFLOL... Rush simply did the job the Journolists failed to do. Exposed Obama for the left wing radikal hack he is... and it took the electorate a while to catch on, unfortunately the 2008 election had taken place already, but it seems we have begun to fix the Obama mess foisted upon us by the Journolist Propagandists.

This election was about Obama and his Hope and Change BS... being exposed for exactly that... BS.

.
 
Last edited:
from Federal Republic

Dude, did you even read the post before your head exploded with rage?

Sir, er... sorry .... dude - yes, I did read the post and some here liked it and agreed. No rage was involved. My response was calm and measured.
 
Talk about gullible, what about the ones who fell for The One and voted for him in '08.
Many of us knew what he was all about, but others just liked the sound of hope and change.
Some are probably wishing they had listened to Rush, Hannity and others who were trying to warn them.

You obviously chose to ignore all of the Democrat's accomplishments. They're the ones who set the stage and created the bills, not Obama, he's just the figure head who signs them. I'm surprised a person of your intelligence doesn't know this.

ricksfolly
 
Take offense all you like, but YOU and your fiscal conservative dreams ride on his coattails, for he is the one that took on Obama, making failure of his socialist dreams/policies a national discussion.

It is Rush who dissected and dissects Obama's charge to socialism and brings attention to what he and his pack of Radikals have foisted upon the nation. It is he that takes on the Journolists Propaganda Machine in an effort to restore both fiscal and social conservatism.

You may piss in his face, but without him you and your fiscal conservative dreams would be screwed. Rush set the stage for the Tea Party (over decades I might add), and my bet is a large portion of the movement that is in the process of saving America from Obama and the Radikal Left are Rush inspired to some degree.

I wonder why nobody has polled to find out what influence he has... but that Obama targeted him says volumes.



He certainly filled a leadership vacuum after Obama was elected, as the R's were acting as if Jesse Jackson had cut their nuts out and the president targeted Rush for destruction. Rush is also the premier spokesman for conservatism in the nation... for more than a couple decades.



ROTFLOL... Rush simply did the job the Journolists failed to do. Exposed Obama for the left wing radikal hack he is... and it took the electorate a while to catch on, unfortunately the 2008 election had taken place already, but it seems we have begun to fix the Obama mess foisted upon us by the Journolist Propagandists.

This election was about Obama and his Hope and Change BS... being exposed for exactly that... BS.

.

Dude, how do you not see how you are talking about this man the same way you accuse many others of talking about Obama, as a Messiah, savior to all.

You even use the word "save" to describe what his work has done to America. The very definition of the word "savior" is "one who saves, rescues, or delivers."

and my bet is a large portion of the movement that is in the process of saving America from Obama and the Radikal Left are Rush inspired to some degree.

Let me ask you two simple questions. Has Rush saved this nation through his work or at the very least set the stage for its salvation? And are you aware that radical is spelled with a "C" not a "K?"
 
Take offense all you like, but YOU and your fiscal conservative dreams ride on his coattails, for he is the one that took on Obama, making failure of his socialist dreams/policies a national discussion.

It is Rush who dissected and dissects Obama's charge to socialism and brings attention to what he and his pack of Radikals have foisted upon the nation. It is he that takes on the Journolists Propaganda Machine in an effort to restore both fiscal and social conservatism.

So he's the one responsible for umm, well... the way you are?
 
from Federal Republic



Sir, er... sorry .... dude - yes, I did read the post and some here liked it and agreed. No rage was involved. My response was calm and measured.

Yeah. I noticed that some here liked it and agreed. Your response, although measured, was not exactly calm. You also complained about the use of the word ignorant, even going so far as to post the definition, without realizing that you were ignorant. Since your conceit was born of ignorance of the fact that the word ignorant was used correctly according to the defintion you posted, maybe I owe you an apology.

Since you have now been educated and can no longer claim ignorance about the use of the word ignorant in the proper context, I trust that you will no longer display conceit as if us stupid cretins didn't know what the word ignorant meant.

To those who liked and agreed with your statement...that level of conceit should not be tolerated.:mrgreen:
 
Has Rush saved this nation through his work or at the very least set the stage for its salvation?

Nope... All Rush has ever done is complain, exaggerate, throw tantrums, bitch and moan, wildly accuse, and make up things out of his own sick mind. Not surprising that he has so many blind believers because they all have sick minds too.

ricksfolly
 
:lamo

:lamo I just noticed your sig line.

Anyway, I see you are still trying to find that illusive Republican leader. Give it up. We don't have one, and we won't until 2012.:rwbelepha

I had wondered if you had noticed. :mrgreen:





Purrrrrs
 
Back
Top Bottom