• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rumours are that Harris has picked Andy Beshear (= Kentucky governor) as her Vice President. (1 Viewer)

Bok Tuklo said:
I find your protest a bit thin. You seem to have Buttigieg's sex life on the mind. Not that you know anything about it. So, you are left with your own fantasies.

I mean, if scat is your kink, have at it.
Click to expand...
Scat? Is that what the word 'bootyfudge' refers to?
Ew. How old is that guy?
 
Grand Mal said:
Republicans seem to have forgotten that American voters rejected Trump twice, in favour of lesser candidates.
Click to expand...
Hopefully three times the charm and these cultists will finally learn their lesson.
 
VySky said:
Harris must have a problem with gays looking past Pete Bootyfudge.

I think he would be a more popular pick.
Click to expand...
Why would sexual preference be a factor in selecting a VP?


Trump must have a problem with gays since he has never considered any in his selection process. :giggle:
 
Assuming the reports are accurate, this may not be a bad choice.
 
mike2810 said:
Why would sexual preference be a factor in selecting a VP?


Trump must have a problem with gays since he has never considered any in his selection process. :giggle:
Click to expand...
Depends on which "selection process" you're talking about.

Melania did that NSFW girl-on-girl photo shoot......so, Trump seems ok with Sapphic love.
 
verrip1 said:
Why, thanks for asking. There most certainly is a 2. It's followed by something we call 3. You'll never guess what we call the next number!

As to Harris, all the biochemical rush the Dems can muster has suddenly left them forgetful that just a few months ago the only person with a lower approval polling than Biden's 34% was Harris at 28%. Dem brain rush doesn't turn into any undecided or wishy-washy votes going their way. Nor does Harris' ethnicity draw back disaffected black voters. Dems really need to get over their plantation mentality and stop presuming that they own black votes - it's causing the disaffection to grow, not recede.
Click to expand...
Good one. I meant a verri2. Hope you knew that. Do you think those approval ratings are meaningful anymore considering all that has changed? They sounds like a "nice statistic" that no one paid attention to originally and probably don't care about now either. (I'd say the same if they were Trump stats from a Lefty.) Why do you think they are still significant? And with who?
 
I think she is close if not already there. Reports are she wants it announced ahead of August 7th.
 
Fearandloathing said:
Pure propaganda without foundation.

Really, you should make an effort to have content with your uniformed and unsolicited opinion
Click to expand...
In other words, exactly the type of propaganda that the average Trump supporter would post.
 
VySky said:
I live a stones throw from the KY border

Beshear is not popular in the rural parts but Lexington and Louisville really support him.
Click to expand...
Simply not true. While, TRump carried most all of the rural counties, Beshear had decent support in many counties statewide.
BTW, I can drop a pebble in Ky. I don't have to throw it........)
 
Yo
Fletch said:
Libs do nothing but engage in name calling then whine when it comes their way.
Click to expand...
You mean like Trump does when after relentless name calling, he cries like a baby if the press shows an unflattering photo of him. .......lmao
 
Showtime586 said:
Simply not true. While, TRump carried most all of the rural counties, Beshear had decent support in many counties statewide.
BTW, I can drop a pebble in Ky. I don't have to throw it........)
Click to expand...
I think Beshear's handling of the significant number of natural disasters KY suffered these past few years endeared him to rural Kentucky which is generally very poor and very red. He won't bring KY with him, not even close, BUT he will have broad appeal to moderates. While probably not well known nationally I expect he is well known in the rust belt. Just heard Harris is doing a rust belt tour next week and wants her VP with her........
 
Tender Branson said:
Andy Beshear has been elected and re-elected Governor of Kentucky, a state Trump won by 30%.

Beshear is doing really well with the Appalachia/Midwest/South kind of rural voters, who are workingclass and conservative.

He would improve Harris' standing in rural and suburb areas, while Harris would bring city/minority types to the polls.

A great ticket.
Click to expand...
I have nothing against Beshear, but I think Shapiro would be a better choice. Just my personal opinion.
 
Jessie C said:
I have nothing against Beshear, but I think Shapiro would be a better choice. Just my personal opinion.
Click to expand...
Instinctively I think Shapiro or Kelly but there may be internal polling and data that shows something different......good news is there isn't a bad choice in the bunch. Bet a lot of Republicans are wishing Trump picked Rubio!
 
Callen said:
Instinctively I think Shapiro or Kelly but there may be internal polling and data that shows something different......good news is there isn't a bad choice in the bunch. Bet a lot of Republicans are wishing Trump picked Rubio!
Click to expand...
Trump should have found the most pro-war politician he could find but that's not his style.
 
Not electorally smart. I hope this is incorrect.
 
Tender Branson said:
669e60e680d4d5da13d5ccad


Would be a good ticket.
Click to expand...

Good looking dude.
 
Neue_Regel said:
Trump should have found the most pro-war politician he could find but that's not his style.
Click to expand...
Why do you think he should have picked a pro war-politician? To nail down the "pro-war" vote?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom