- Joined
- Mar 3, 2018
- Messages
- 16,876
- Reaction score
- 7,398
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
So Guiliani is a pervert, my goodness
Wonderful!
Rudy Giuliani, New York City’s former mayor and President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, was caught on camera touching his genitals in front of a woman he believed was a journalist, but was actually an actor involved in the sequel to Sacha Baron Cohen’s movie “Borat.”Rudy Giuliani Caught On Camera Appearing To Touch Genitals During ‘Borat’ Prank
Giuliani, 76, was filmed putting his hands in his pants when he thought he was with a female journalist.m.huffpost.com
OH DEAR, you mean it is edited JUST like Okeefe does? FAKE excuse.Good grief, man ... spreading lies again, eh?
Ben Dreyfuss, editorial director for ueber-liberal rag Mother Jones:
I have now seen the scene with Rudy Giuliani and though it is creepy for other reasons it is being described on twitter in a false way. He does not have his hand down his pants in a sexual way. He is tucking his shirt back in after she untucks it removing his mic.
Also the bat thing is a joke she prompts and he just politely agrees.
The scene is confusingly edited for comedic purposes which makes sense since this is a comedy film and not a 60 Minutes expose. It would be good to keep that in mind in light of the flattening of media where everything can seem like everything else.
There are parts of this scene that are creepy though! In the same scene he pats her on the lower back in a very weird way. You will be able to find stuff you don’t like watching it. But I do not think the description of the “hand in the pants” thing is fair.
Kinda burying the ****ing lede here because HE HAD BEEN TOLD SHE WAS FIFTEEN
Well…that didn't take long for a Democrat smear job to fall apart!Good grief, man ... spreading lies again, eh?
Ben Dreyfuss, editorial director for ueber-liberal rag Mother Jones:
I have now seen the scene with Rudy Giuliani and though it is creepy for other reasons it is being described on twitter in a false way. He does not have his hand down his pants in a sexual way. He is tucking his shirt back in after she untucks it removing his mic.
Also the bat thing is a joke she prompts and he just politely agrees.
The scene is confusingly edited for comedic purposes which makes sense since this is a comedy film and not a 60 Minutes expose. It would be good to keep that in mind in light of the flattening of media where everything can seem like everything else.
There are parts of this scene that are creepy though! In the same scene he pats her on the lower back in a very weird way. You will be able to find stuff you don’t like watching it. But I do not think the description of the “hand in the pants” thing is fair.
When exactly was he told she's fifteen?
I'm told that's central to the film. Borat is trying to marry off his "15 year old" daughter. Other details I've heard from people who have seen an early screening.
Even if a couple of the major points are off or misleading, there's no scenario in which this is good for Rudy. He was alone in a hotel room with a reporter a third his age "for a drink."
So Guiliani is a pervert, my goodness
Wonderful!
Rudy Giuliani Caught On Camera Appearing To Touch Genitals During ‘Borat’ Prank
Giuliani, 76, was filmed putting his hands in his pants when he thought he was with a female journalist.m.huffpost.com
Rudy Giuliani, New York City’s former mayor and President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, was caught on camera touching his genitals in front of a woman he believed was a journalist, but was actually an actor involved in the sequel to Sacha Baron Cohen’s movie “Borat.”
Isn't it common for New York Italians to grab their genitals periodically?
I thought it was a thing.
Don't have a conniption folks I posted the thread tongue in cheek
When exactly was he told she's fifteen?
What's amazing to me is that Huffpo covered it the way they did. Very misleading.Ben Dreyfuss
@bendreyfuss
2h
The scene is confusingly edited for comedic purposes which makes sense since this is a comedy film and not a 60 Minutes expose. It would be good to keep that in mind in light of the flattening of media where everything can seem like everything else. https://twitter.com/bendreyfuss/
1) She wasn't 15, the actress is 24.Of course it is.
But not in front of a fifteen year old girl when you're in your seventies.
My God, most of us have GRANDDAUGHTERS that age by the time we're that old.
HuffCompost is notorious for being misleading.What's amazing to me is that Huffpo covered it the way they did. Very misleading.
1) She wasn't 15, the actress is 24.
2) He was tucking in his shirt after she removed the microphone.
Yes, Huffpo is playing 'fast and loose with the facts. Not unusual, but they claim to be a legitimate news source.Oh, so they're playing fast and loose with the facts?
[deflection]
By the way, did Rudy know she wasn't fifteen?
Sorry, but I think this is a hoot because after four years of nonstop prevarication on a weapons grade level, it's refreshing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?