• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ron Paul Wins Presidential Straw Poll at CPAC


What we need is the "new" cause the old is clearly not working.
 
What we need is the "new" cause the old is clearly not working.

Clever... so why would you vote for a guy that would push for 'more of the same'... sure he'll sweet talk you to convince you otherwise, but you've got to have figured it out. Let's make what was old new again, and many of the problems will disappear over night.

I prefer that kind of responsibility to the alternative....
 
I would definitely support Ron Paul getting the Republican presidential nomination. His ideas are very...distinct. And having a neo-Confederate running against the black President would bring out the true face of Republicanism nicely.
 

Guy - I have heard that line of reasoning before. It comes down to "yes I am a Libertarian but I do not vote for the Libertarian but I am still a Libertarian".
Which is like a proclaimed vegetarian going into a restaurant and ordering a steak but still proudly renouncing eating the flesh of animals. In this country, we get to vote only periodically. When push comes to shove, many who claim to be libertarians leave the party of libertarianism at the curb. I think that the Libertarian Party vote for President is indeed a good gauge of the true hardcore Libertarian support. Just look at both Ron Paul and Rand Paul. The libertarians view them as their special pin-up boys but neither can run as anything but a Republican and be competitive.
 


Setting the Government's Agenda by Gary North




Some analysis on the why so many are pissed at Dr. Paul's victory
 
Last edited:
Setting the Government's Agenda by Gary North

Some analysis on the why so many are pissed at Dr. Paul's victory

Yup... and that's why, while so many are trying to say Ron Paul can't win... the reality is that Ron Paul CANNOT LOSE! Even if he does not become president he will have the chance to inject his message into the debate, which will cause more people to realize the disconnect between government today and the founding principle's on which the government is founded on.

Then, four years down the line when the country is that much deeper in debt, the government is far more socialized... then someone else can come in and put himself in the firing line while standing for the same principle's that made the country a beacon of freedom the world over.
Edit : That is assuming that this 'socialization' process doesn't lead to any sort of 'hot' takeover of the system.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…