• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars

What medias' lie?

You aren't all that discerning then.
The lie about what DeSantis said. But then you knew that and are just playing silly little games because your lied got called out.
 
:ROFLMAO:

Got any more feckless insults to try to fling my way? I'm sure you do!



No you didn't. You just stamped your feet and insisted you're right because you say so. That may have worked for you when you were a child, but it won't work on a debate forum of adults. :)
Whining about being insulted while you spew insult after insult. Hilarious.

Yes I did. And you know it. You simply lack the integrity to admit it.
 
Never stop for rioters
It was a hate crime


A mob of Portland Black Lives Matter protesters forced a white man to crash his truck, then punched and kicked him unconscious, disturbing footage shows.

A series of clips on social media shows the victim being surrounded in his white Ford truck at 10.30 p.m. Sunday as others attacked a woman he was with, who was punched and even tackled to the ground during the violent melee.

“He didn’t do nothing!” someone could be heard calling as others punched the driver as he sat in his truck, which was also repeatedly kicked.
 
Whining about being insulted while you spew insult after insult. Hilarious.

Yes I did. And you know it. You simply lack the integrity to admit it.

:ROFLMAO:

You're not even trying to debate now. You're just firing feeble insults into the air in hopes that they will hit...something.

Any time you'd like to make an intelligent point, you are free to begin. :)
 
:ROFLMAO:

You're not even trying to debate now. You're just firing feeble insults into the air in hopes that they will hit...something.

Any time you'd like to make an intelligent point, you are free to begin. :)
More whining. How sad.

I have already demonstrated your lies and you pathetic double standards.
That you lack the ability to comprehend that is a you not a me problem.
 
More whining. How sad.

I have already demonstrated your lies and you pathetic double standards.
That you lack the ability to comprehend that is a you not a me problem.

What have you proven? Where have you made proofs? All that's to be seen from you is feckless finger pointing.

So if you have anything intelligent to say, let's see it. NOW. :)
 
What have you proven? Where have you made proofs? All that's to be seen from you is feckless finger pointing.

So if you have anything intelligent to say, let's see it. NOW. :)
Sorry not interested in playing this trolling game with you. Go back a few posts and you will find it.
 
Sorry not interested in playing this trolling game with you. Go back a few posts and you will find it.

Sorry not interested in searching through 583 posts to find something you allegedly said. Provide a post number or I will assume you are lying yet again.
 
Sorry not interested in searching through 583 posts to find something you allegedly said. Provide a post number or I will assume you are lying yet again.
It’s literally on the previous page. But then you know that and just playing your silly little game.
 
It’s literally on the previous page. But then you know that and just playing your silly little game.

So you won't provide the post number, just like you won't make an intelligent point about DeathSantis's support of violence.
 
We aren't talking about Chicago here. No government official in Chicago has advocated for such a policy. Can you try harder to keep the focus where it belongs here? And like I said before, such incidents are rare. How about you? Have you ever driven headlong into an active demonstration? If so, why would you do something so stupid as that? Can you always see a major accident ahead? No, you almost always learn about them after they have happened, when the traffic starts backing up, and maybe when the radio later tells you what's happening. And there isn't a thing you can do about it until the authorities find and establish a route to go around it. Until then, you're stuck and have no choice but to accept it. Nothing different. But to continue to try to plow ahead through a crowd of protesters is just silly. It's just stupid and recklessly dangerous. You're just digging the hole even deeper. So what if you're late getting to where you are going? What's the big deal?

Nice try at deflection. The entire thread has been a discussion about people having a right to escape or defend themselves if they get surrounded by a threatening mob.

So yeah, any and all cities are involved in that discussion.

It’s notable that you opted to avoid addressing what people should’ve done in the videos I shared. Just not getting surrounded by a mob isn’t a legitimate or serious argument. It’s honestly rather insane.
 
So you won't provide the post number, just like you won't make an intelligent point about DeathSantis's support of violence.

Violence is very often involved in self defense. Maybe you have a problem with that.
 
You mean mobs aren't stationary? Their elements could flank and envelop a motor vehicle?

I hope I can just not get myself shot or assaulted the next time I go out on the town…lord knows I could just walk right into a gun firing at me and it’d totally be my own fault!
 
I hope I can just not get myself shot or assaulted the next time I go out on the town…lord knows I could just walk right into a gun firing at me and it’d totally be my own fault!

Who do you think you are, trying to walk where someone wants to shoot?
 
Violence is very often involved in self defense. Maybe you have a problem with that.

Would figure that you would come in in support of violence. :rolleyes:
 
Would figure that you would come in in support of violence. :rolleyes:

Would figure you would reject the idea of self defense. Who do people think they are that they can be secure in their persons, right?
 
Would figure you would reject the idea of self defense.

You think that running over protestors who are simply blocking traffic is self-defense?

Who do people think they are that they can be secure in their persons, right?

Yeah, screw democracy! How dare Karen be late for her hair appointment! :ROFLMAO:
 
So you won't provide the post number, just like you won't make an intelligent point about DeathSantis's support of violence.
You already quoted it so pretending like you didn’t see it is just more dishonest bs from you. M
But hey it’s all you ever do.
 
You already quoted it so pretending like you didn’t see it is just more dishonest bs from you. M
But hey it’s all you ever do.

If I wanted to hear childish insults, I'd go watch cartoons, not listen to your idiotic posts.
 
If I wanted to hear childish insults, I'd go watch cartoons, not listen to your idiotic posts.
Sorry that having your lies called out triggers you so.

You know you could always just stop lying.
 
It’s not free speech to block/trap people in their cars and/or behave aggressively while doing so.

Stand on the sidewalk and hold a ****ing sign, bitch into your bullhorns, and behave like a civilized person, and nobody will have any problems.
The leftists in this forum support dragging people out of their cars, though.

That is why they frame what he actually said as dishonestly as they do.
 
You think that running over protestors who are simply blocking traffic is self-defense?

If I thought that, you wouldn't have to try to imply that I do.

Yeah, screw democracy! How dare Karen be late for her hair appointment! :ROFLMAO:

See? You take the false implication in your disingenuous question, and run with it like it's actually meaningful. It's just a story you're making up as you go.

How can anyone reach adulthood and not know that violence is often a necessary component of self defense.
 
If I thought that, you wouldn't have to try to imply that I do.

So you agree that running over protestors who are simply blocking traffic is not self-defense?

See? You take the false implication in your disingenuous question, and run with it like it's actually meaningful. It's just a story you're making up as you go.

How can anyone reach adulthood and not know that violence is often a necessary component of self defense.

Strawman rejected.
 
Back
Top Bottom