Romanian hacker Guccifer: I breached Clinton server, 'it was easy' | Fox News
In the process of mining data from the Blumenthal account, Lazar said he came across evidence that others were on the Clinton server.
"As far as I remember, yes, there were … up to 10, like, IPs from other parts of the world,” he said.
....
For Lazar, a plea agreement where he cooperates in exchange for a reduced sentence would be advantageous. He told Fox News he has nothing to hide and wants to cooperate with the U.S. government, adding that he has hidden two gigabytes of data that is “too hot” and “it is a matter of national security.”
The methods this guy says he used make sense.. I wonder what all he has in those 2 gigs?
I believe that Hillary may end up being indicted, but not because of the data on her server, which was not classified top secret until AFTER it was on her server. Ex Post Facto laws are unconstitutional. If she is indicted, it will be for lying to investigators in the beginning, which is a serious charge in itself.
Yeah, I don't doubt she's guilty of lying given her contradictions already. Also find it likely she did indeed use her home server in order to conduct Clinton Global Initiative business. It's likely she also allowed influence peddling.I believe that Hillary may end up being indicted, but not because of the data on her server, which was not classified top secret until AFTER it was on her server. Ex Post Facto laws are unconstitutional. If she is indicted, it will be for lying to investigators in the beginning, which is a serious charge in itself.
I believe that Hillary may end up being indicted, but not because of the data on her server, which was not classified top secret until AFTER it was on her server. Ex Post Facto laws are unconstitutional. If she is indicted, it will be for lying to investigators in the beginning, which is a serious charge in itself.
Might leave a mark.This could put Clinton in the deep doodoo.
I believe that Hillary may end up being indicted, but not because of the data on her server, which was not classified top secret until AFTER it was on her server. Ex Post Facto laws are unconstitutional. If she is indicted, it will be for lying to investigators in the beginning, which is a serious charge in itself.
I believe that Hillary may end up being indicted, but not because of the data on her server, which was not classified top secret until AFTER it was on her server. Ex Post Facto laws are unconstitutional. If she is indicted, it will be for lying to investigators in the beginning, which is a serious charge in itself.
As Secretary of State she have been exercising some judgement as to what was classified, what might be classified, and what was not classified. These long-running screw-ups reflects strongly on her poor judgement. She has a name but there is nothing much, only a very ambitious woman, behind it.I believe that Hillary may end up being indicted, but not because of the data on her server, which was not classified top secret until AFTER it was on her server. Ex Post Facto laws are unconstitutional. If she is indicted, it will be for lying to investigators in the beginning, which is a serious charge in itself.
I believe that Hillary may end up being indicted, but not because of the data on her server, which was not classified top secret until AFTER it was on her server. Ex Post Facto laws are unconstitutional. If she is indicted, it will be for lying to investigators in the beginning, which is a serious charge in itself.
Information is classified at the source. It's not possible that she was in possession of pre-classified information unless she was the originator.
Not true. What you saw was the fact that she literally typed out and/or copy+pasted classified information, which makes it classified at the time it was written. Just because nobody knew about it until years later was it actually marked as classified, hence the reason you see the classified date matching the date the email was created.
You'd better tell the investigators because they keep talking about information that was "classified at a later date."
I think that is irrelevant. Isn't she supposed to not have any information at all on an unsecured server? And treat it all as if it is classified?I believe that Hillary may end up being indicted, but not because of the data on her server, which was not classified top secret until AFTER it was on her server.
Did we? Did we see that?
Not everything that could happen will happen.
It all depends on luck,the law and how good her lawyers are.
Hillary Clinton is a good lawyer herself.
I don't know. It's so convenient that we hear about this hacker now.
Who was responsible for 'classifying them at a later date'? Can you name this person?Did we? Did we see that?
When would you have preferred to hear about it?I don't know. It's so convenient that we hear about this hacker now.
Did we? Did we see that?
You'd better tell the investigators because they keep talking about information that was "classified at a later date."
Over 100 emails that hillary wrote herself? Once the state department received them years later determined the emails contain info that is sensitive. How, prey tell, could they have been classified at an earlier date unless hillary classified them when she wrote them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?