OK. I'll play.Now that the precedent is going to be "let the states decide"...interracial and gay marriage will be at the prerogative of the states as well. Look for this in the next few decades.
Right, because they want to waive student loans to specifically help doctors and lawyers.
can you come up with a rational reason for a state to outlaw gay marriage or civil unions?
Birthright citizenship is something else they want to overturn. SB8 in Texas has provided the roadmap. The Roberts court has given it their approval.... Now if there is an inconvenient law that a state wants to circumvent, they simply write a clever law that doesn't hit any of the trip wires and they are home free.If conservatives continue down this regressive path you could turn out to be correct in your prediction. We already have a Republican senator saying Griswold should be overturned.
Senator Says Legalizing Interracial Marriage Was a Mistake, Backtracks Unconvincingly
Mike Braun of Indiana told reporters that the Supreme Court was wrong to strike down state laws that banned Black and white Americans from wedding.slate.com
Was that the only people who were eligible for student loan forgiveness?
Essentially, those who can "drive or fly" to a neighboring state--your words; not mine--are those affluent enough to be able to do so.
Are you attempting to imply they are talking about waiving student loan debt for only doctors and lawyers who make over 100k? Because that would be a lie. Surely you're not trying to deceive people.So Democrats care about poor people now? They are talking about waiving student loan debt for doctors and lawyers who make over 100k.
Class warfare? Gimme a break.
Who do you think owes the most in student loans? White doctors and lawyers.....
Uninterested in whataboutismsome on the right note the same about gun control In both cases, there is merit to this argument if someone is poor and lives in an abortion banning state.
Ok, and?And the lesser educated/poor are more likely to not use or obtain birth control
I am unaware of any political movement that stands any chance of winning the majority of elected seats in any state that proposes bringing back miscegenation laws.Now that the precedent is going to be "let the states decide"...interracial and gay marriage will be at the prerogative of the states as well. Look for this in the next few decades.
I support legal abortionUninterested in whataboutism
Ok, and?
LOL. Concern trolling over lawyers getting student loans forgiven and then goes into this bullshit.Okay.....????
You can take a train, like $25-30.
You haven't identified why I should care about your statement regarding poor people and birth controlI support legal abortion
I haven't seen that. Do you have a link?So Democrats care about poor people now? They are talking about waiving student loan debt for doctors and lawyers who make over 100k.
Class warfare? Gimme a break.
and?Who do you think owes the most in student loans? White doctors and lawyers.....
Stop posting dumb things.Okay.....????
You can take a train, like $25-30.
Many conservatives don't like it and want it banned. That is all the reason needed. C'mon, you've seen posters on this very forum who have no reservation calling it immoral, deviant behavior that must be banned. Why pretend this isn't something they'll push for next?can you come up with a rational reason for a state to outlaw gay marriage or civil unions?
Well, to be fair, he did ask for a "rational reason". You won't find one where religion is concerned. Some christian leaders thought that Florida was getting hit with hurricanes as a result of Disney having "gay days" at their theme park.Many conservatives don't like it and want it banned. That is all the reason needed. C'mon, you've seen posters on this very forum who have no reservation calling it immoral, deviant behavior that must be banned. Why pretend this isn't something they'll push for next?
Fair enough. Rational reason: conservative politicians recognize that some of their electorate passionately hate gay people and will provide funding, votes and adoration if said politicians translate their passion into public policy.Well, to be fair, he did ask for a "rational reason". You won't find one where religion is concerned. Some christian leaders thought that Florida was getting hit with hurricanes as a result of Disney having "gay days" at their theme park.
I'm still sort of new here but if this board is like other boards, you could probably find dozens of posts that state very plainly that marriage is between one man and one woman. I'm agnostic on religion. But as I was raised a Methodist, I can see where procreation of the species ties into that whole argument. Inter-racial marriage that will undoubtedly also be targeted will be straight out of the irrational nature of Christianity.
Interracial marriage? Clarence Thomas himself is in an interracial marriage. The fact that you would stoop to that kind of allegation shows how low your politics is.Now that the precedent is going to be "let the states decide"...interracial and gay marriage will be at the prerogative of the states as well. Look for this in the next few decades.
I don't think it will happen any time soon. As I recall, Senate Minority Leader McConnell is in an interracial marriage as well.Interracial marriage? Clarence Thomas himself is in an interracial marriage. The fact that you would stoop to that kind of allegation shows how low your politics is.
Deuce,
Look at the population numbers. If more people do not have more babies, our civilization will crumble.
The global birthrate has been on a steady decline since 1960. There is no reason to have an abortion, we need the complete opposite.
What other methods are you willing to support in furtherance of forcing women to be pregnant?
Gay marriage is definitely next.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?