• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rittenhouse trial WOW!

Wrong again as usual. Jurors are asked NOT to form opinions of the defendant or victims. The past history of both is withheld from the jury if not relevant to the case and sometimes even then it's withheld to not prejudice the jury.

I'm no ninja but if I get my hands on your gun and have an intent to kill you it's gonna be a very bad day for you.

I'm no good on a skateboard terrible in fact. But I guarantee you that I can beat your brains out with one if that was my intent and you refused to use deadly force to stop me.

You should probably try a force of force exercise so that you may fully understand how insanely ignorant you are being with respect your position.

How does an unarmed person neutralize a rifle carrying gunman? #1 way.......get your hands on the rifle. #2 incapacitate the carrier.

Notice the pedophile and the skateboard wife beater BOTH went for the rifle. One was two slow and telegraphed it.........his 5 rape victims got justice for it. The skateboard guy thried to incapacitate with multiple blows toward the head from the skateboard. He then grabbed the rifle and ran not realizing that the kid had a sling. As the gun hit the end of the slings range his grip slipped and he will never beat another woman again. Both garbage human beings played with fire and got burned.

Even the two dead scumbags knew how to beat a man armed with a rifle yet you don't.
Jurors in self defense are to put themselves into the shoes of both parties.
As far as past histories..do you really believe that the jury members had nor heard about the victims backgrounds?
Come now. You don't think they had an opinion on the protestors etc..
None?
Come now.
If you attempt to get your hand on my firearm you ain't going to like what happens. You will be alive but not walking.
You can try to beat my brains with a skateboard...but it's going to be hard when your knees are broken and you are searching for your teeth with your eyes swollen shut.
You have no clue what you are talking about..
Too much playing gravy seal for you.
 
AVvXsEgdqi4O9hWm4WIGbIMJUBEt-7vsqQr8inBjw3ag7U57RhrZDzgFlDRNzYyuirr1-GVpjZTx75e9HU8eZlcu3AJRIzRD_rEmtI73OZh2uP9NmkUblqIKogjiS8OQkHO9dik3NDzzA4aP0BPfWI_-_uFLtWEZqRBni-FZuGwrE24WMKwZ2ikmfg
 
Hey -- are you finally getting why Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum?
Sure..he got scared ..panicked and shot Rosenbaum
He thought he was a tough guy with his AR 15.
He thought he was going to intimidate people. He ran into a guy that yelled at him..that dared him to attack..
And rittenhouse panicked..and ended up pointing his rifle and shooting 2 unarmed men and a third who tried to stop him from shooting another.
 
Marxist Midget Reich is a big fan of an authoritarian collectivist government and he hates the thought of citizens having any powers-including firepower.
 
Marxist Midget Reich is a big fan of an authoritarian collectivist government and he hates the thought of citizens having any powers-including firepower.
Umm you do realize the irony of supporting the continued budget increases of the military arm of the authoritarian collectivist government right?
 
So you feel vigilantism should be ok. Is that correct?
no he's saying it's wrong Kyle won. He shot vigilantes.
Not following all the details, but my understanding is he went with the intention of using a firearm to protect the area from those he perceived to be lawless and creating chaos.
and he only ever used it to defend himself against people that were threatening his life.

Why don't you care about those vigilantes? Is it because they're enforcing what you want? Is it only okay when you agree with it?
While some might see that as noble, it seems like vigilantism to me. And that is counter to law and order.
what does that have to do with the people that attacked him? Is it just open season on anybody who the rioters think are vigilantes are the people the writers think are vigilantes just supposed to lay down and die?
 
I don't find this bumper sticker logic to have any merit
That is because it is not only inaccurate, but it reflects the simple mindset of the ignorant left who clearly have never served in the military. Nobody that I know who owns firearms fears the military. Some fear what local law enforcement may do under the control of leftist despot Mayors, but no one fears the military. Besides, many of the gun owners are former military and would know better than anyone why the military is not feared. Only someone who has never been in the military could concoct such utter stupidity.

The military swears its allegiance to the US Constitution, not to some leftist wannabe dictator. So those who post such ridiculous bumper stickers, and it is always a leftist, are merely demonstrating their vast ignorance on the subject.
 
Here is a hint for both you and Robert Reich since you both appear to be utterly clueless: If you do not wish to be shot, do not attack someone who is armed with a gun. :rolleyes:

Like the 5 people killed by Anthony Ferrill at the Molson Coors brewery in Milwaukee.
 
That is because it is not only inaccurate, but it reflects the simple mindset of the ignorant left who clearly have never served in the military. Nobody that I know who owns firearms fears the military. Some fear what local law enforcement may do under the control of leftist despot Mayors, but no one fears the military. Besides, many of the gun owners are former military and would know better than anyone why the military is not feared. Only someone who has never been in the military could concoct such utter stupidity.

The military swears its allegiance to the US Constitution, not to some leftist wannabe dictator. So those who post such ridiculous bumper stickers, and it is always a leftist, are merely demonstrating their vast ignorance on the subject.
Hmm..so then americans have no need of firearms to protect themselves from tyrannical government?
 
Hmm..so then americans have no need of firearms to protect themselves from tyrannical government?

No need at all

Especially since those opposing gun control also are generally those who oppose cuts to defense spending

How do you explain that ?
 
No need at all

Especially since those opposing gun control also are generally those who oppose cuts to defense spending

How do you explain that ?
The right wing has as much intellectual disconnect as the left wing.
 
So why would the RW want to harass gun owners ?
Oh boy...
Thanks for yet again proving my point by demonstrating left wing intellectual disconnect.
 
Hmm..so then americans have no need of firearms to protect themselves from tyrannical government?
That is not what I said, but I'm not surprised that you would intentionally misconstrue my post.

What I actually said was that Americans have no need of firearms to protect themselves from the military. I know you won't, but do try to get it right next time.
 
Back
Top Bottom