Fledermaus
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 134,259
- Reaction score
- 37,367
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
The judge seemingly prohibited the prosecution from calling the deceased "victims".
Attackers rarely are.
The judge seemingly prohibited the prosecution from calling the deceased "victims".
Since you obviously are incapable of understanding comparison examples let's try twisting your response in a last effort to help you understand how wrong and ignorant your position is.Naw.. you got it right..why the military stresses the use of skateboard s as deadly weapons instead of their rifles..
Don't you know skateboards are standard isse to the elite special forces...with their rigid killing power.
The situation wasn't a child getting struck by a skateboard..
The situation was a rifle being pointed at people..an unarmed person was shot and a man with a skateboard responded by trying to stop the man with the firearm who had already killed a man.
But we are all to believe you..that Rittenhouse who had a frighin ar 15..who shot an unarmed man..who pointed it at people..should not be seen as a threat by anyone on that street..no the unarmed people and the man with the skateboard should be seen as the threat.
I have fought multiple times in hand to hand in a fight. Multiple times against unarmed people I was arresting.who resisted.
Twice against people with knives.. once again a man with a tire iron. When I worked security.
There was no mob bent on death...
Cripes their were multiple armed people that could have simply shot Rittenhouse from a distance without him knowing
The last man he shot could have simply shot him in the back when he was running.
You simply need to make up a fantasy of unarmed Ninjas neutralizing a rifle pointed at them..deadly weapon skateboards and mobs of death..
To justify Rittenhouse panicking and killing unarmed people.
It's not the jury's job to be empathetic. They simply look at the facts in the case. As they did.Naw..the point is..the jury didn't have empathy for the victims. Just like you don't.
Reporter should be charges with jury tampering, and the news agency told they could lose there FCC license if they don't take disciplinary action.Saw a dude saying that two of the jurors are scared to give a decision, and that is why it was held up. We already know someone was caught recording the jurors. If true this is a big ****ing deal. At the point of the left intimidating jurors into not doing their jobs properly we may as well just turn people over to pitchfork carrying mobs.
Yes it is. Especially in self defense. That's how you look at the facts of the case and arrive at a just decision.It's not the jury's job to be empathetic. They simply look at the facts in the case. As they did.
Misplaced empathy for the dirty scumbags vs a good guy trying to help and business people loosing everything. Good people side with good. You side with child molesting murderous scumbags nuff said.
We don't care what you think as its always backwards.
Well, Kyle the Cry Baby Rittenhouse was not "attacked with deadly force." He shot a guy holding nothing more lethal than a plastic bag full of dirty underwear...lol
They were not comparison examples but your fantasies.Since you obviously are incapable of understanding comparison examples let's try twisting your response in a last effort to help you understand how wrong and ignorant your position is.
You claim the military isn't sending troops in to fight with skateboards in an effort to sarcastically prove that skateboards aren't deadly. So I will rebut this with the shovel. The small shovel called an entrenching tool is used for digging. They don't send troops in to fight with this item either. The military however teaches how to use it defensive and offensively as a make shift weapon.
The skateboard when swung can easily kill. Why you see fit to challenge this is the better question. Do you really think this or are you just messing around because you have nothing else to bitch about? Given how it's such common knowledge that hard objects swung with velocity at a human head can cause death or grave bodily injury the question shifts to you. Are you just incapable?
Anyway it doesn't matter. The jury understood the obvious. They understood the deadly threat posed by Rosenbaum with his bare hands against a rifle armed man. They understood a skateboard can kill and does pose a threat of death. They didn't care that the glock guy didn't shoot when he "COULD HAVE" and noted that pointing a gun at someone in a threatening manner okays the use of deadly force on that person.
The jury of 7 women and 5 men all unanimously understood this but you can't lol.
If you were on the jury, what would you have decided?
Rittenhouse was guilty
He's literally gotten away with murder.
Based on what evidence?
If you followed the trial, the DA laid it all out.
Seriously? Explain.
Wrong again as usual. Jurors are asked NOT to form opinions of the defendant or victims. The past history of both is withheld from the jury if not relevant to the case and sometimes even then it's withheld to not prejudice the jury.Yes it is. Especially in self defense. That's how you look at the facts of the case and arrive at a just decision.
You ignored the facts of the case ..and that's why you had to make up the ninja like unarmed people that can neutralize rifles ..deadly skateboard weapons and murderous mobs.
Rittenhouse was just tried for murder. In the first part of the trial, the DA made the case for his guilt
Did it just pass you by ?
Educate yourself pal. Try some force on force. If you come to Tampa I can play the badguy and if you are successful in repelling my attack you can hit me with some simunitions. If I am successful all you have to do is admit being miserably wrong and I won't hit you with the painful simunition ammo.They were not comparison examples but your fantasies.
Just listen to yourself.." they understood the deadly threat of Rosenbaum with his bare hands against a rifle.
Come now.
And didn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. If you would've said "guilty" it would've been a miscarriage of justice.
That's what Rittenhouse's layers said....it's not a quote I heard from the DA.
LOL! Why WOULD you have heard it from the prosecution? Do you even know how criminal trials work?
So you admit that your view of Rittenhouse's innocence was far from universal - even amongst those with legal training ?
All of the lawyers I follow on YT and Twitter agree with the verdict. Why would the DA agree that he's not guilty when it's his job to prove he isn't? LOL!
What about the lawyers you don't follow.
If you select which YT channels to watch with enough bias, you will start to think Trump was a good president and actually won the election last year.
Mmmkay.
I am not interested in your gravy seal training.Educate yourself pal. Try some force on force. If you come to Tampa I can play the badguy and if you are successful in repelling my attack you can hit me with some simunitions. If I am successful all you have to do is admit being miserably wrong and I won't hit you with the painful simunition ammo.
Start point one or two hands on your rifle!
I won't use a skateboard just my bare hands. Should be a cake walk for you.
And you wouldn't like what would happen if you really tried to take my rifle from me. ..