• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

We do, but instead of calling them "pantries", we call them "grocery stores", they are nearly ubiquitous and carry the same plus even more as yer food banks.


Yer whining about a mainly state/local issue, which is a whole different matter.Uh-huh.....that is how it works with SNAP too....yer not making a point....plus I already established that SNAP users are better shoppers.

And you're whining because people don't want to subsidize school lunch during the summer, your point?
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

And a complete avoidance still of yer previous demands to remove a portion of those in poverty from private/public food redistribution.

Yes, those that abuse the system should be kicked out if the program. Not feeding your kids? Then they need to be taken away.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Agree on all accounts. Government funded food pantries can be open in the summer. If parents are given food and they don't feed their kids, then they need to lose said kids.

why do they need that on top of SNAP and welfare?
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

They don't need SNAP, it would replace it.

i already stated kids should be fed all summer long. they shouldn't have summers off either, they should continue to be educated.

summers off is dumb
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

And you're whining because people don't want to subsidize school lunch during the summer, your point?
Actually, my involvement in this thread has focused nearly exclusively on SNAP as a means to reduce the food insecurity of the massive increase of children in poverty since 2008, particularly dealing with folks claiming that $50 dollar will feed a 4 person household for a week.

Now I'm dealing with a claim of the superiority of charity....or now publicly funded "charity"....in the realm of food redistribution.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

i already stated kids should be fed all summer long. they shouldn't have summers off either, they should continue to be educated.

summers off is dumb

Did you bother to read all my posts? I stated SNAP and summer school lunch programs could be replaced by government funded food pantries. Nobody said kids should eat in the summer.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Did you bother to read all my posts? I stated SNAP and summer school lunch programs could be replaced by government funded food pantries. Nobody said kids should eat in the summer.

i want summer lunches and summer schooling.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Actually, my involvement in this thread has focused nearly exclusively on SNAP as a means to reduce the food insecurity of the massive increase of children in poverty since 2008, particularly dealing with folks claiming that $50 dollar will feed a 4 person household for a week.

Now I'm dealing with a claim of the superiority of charity....or now publicly funded "charity"....in the realm of food redistribution.

Food pantries can feed a family of four for $50 a week. No it doesn't include chips, soda, ice cream or pre-packaged garbage.
It does include rice, dried beans, canned vegetables, canned fruit, eggs, chicken thighs, etc.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Actually, my involvement in this thread has focused nearly exclusively on SNAP as a means to reduce the food insecurity of the massive increase of children in poverty since 2008, particularly dealing with folks claiming that $50 dollar will feed a 4 person household for a week.

Now I'm dealing with a claim of the superiority of charity....or now publicly funded "charity"....in the realm of food redistribution.

the 50/week is for one person. so it's 50 per person per week.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Yes, those that abuse the system should be kicked out if the program. Not feeding your kids? Then they need to be taken away.
So yer previous "large population of folks that have put themselves in poverty", that you still refuse to define, has morphed into "those not feeding their kids".

I grow so tired of yer ever shifting argument searching for those to blame and to starve.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

i want summer lunches and summer schooling.

Our education system shouldn't be playing the role of parent. Give the parents the food, they feed the kids. If they don't, the children need to be removed from the home. I know, it requires parents actually be responsible and suffer the consequences of their actions. I'm kind of a lunatic like that.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

So yer previous "large population of folks that have put themselves in poverty", that you still refuse to define, has morphed into "those not feeding their kids".

I grow so tired of yer ever shifting argument searching for those to blame and to starve.

I don't have a specific number, nor do I care enough to look for one. Responsibility needs to be placed back onto parents. If you can't provide the food, we'll give it to you. It's your job to get the food to your kids. If you don't, then you suffer the consequences.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Our education system shouldn't be playing the role of parent. Give the parents the food, they feed the kids. If they don't, the children need to be removed from the home. I know, it requires parents actually be responsible and suffer the consequences of their actions. I'm kind of a lunatic like that.

i think it would be cheaper to feed them, not give the parents any food money for thier kids, and make the kids study for their food. weekends too. if they want food
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

i already stated kids should be fed all summer long. they shouldn't have summers off either, they should continue to be educated.

summers off is dumb

Who the heck said kids shouldn't be fed during the summer? I just don't think school lunches is the best way to feed them. Seems like you're just trolling again.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Who the heck said kids shouldn't be fed during the summer? I just don't think school lunches is the best way to feed them. Seems like you're just trolling again.

school lunches ensure the food goes to the kids and they eat it. just giving it out, the food will go somewhere else.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

Our education system shouldn't be playing the role of parent. Give the parents the food, they feed the kids. If they don't, the children need to be removed from the home. I know, it requires parents actually be responsible and suffer the consequences of their actions. I'm kind of a lunatic like that.

nevermind. too easy
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

i think it would be cheaper to feed them, not give the parents any food money for thier kids, and make the kids study for their food. weekends too. if they want food

You know what? You're right, I agree. Nothing but processed meat and fatty dairy all summer long.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

You know what? You're right, I agree. Nothing but processed meat and fatty dairy all summer long.

nope, fresh fruits and veggies and a school garden which they help maintain.
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

I don't have a specific number, nor do I care enough to look for one. Responsibility needs to be placed back onto parents. If you can't provide the food, we'll give it to you.
If they don't fall into yer morality based "those who put themselves into poverty"....that you still won't cant define.


It's your job to get the food to your kids. If you don't, then you suffer the consequences.
As if that is a new concept.

How profound
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

You know what? You're right, I agree. Nothing but processed meat and fatty dairy all summer long.

nope. this is where Michelle has her own 'just say no' campaign
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

nevermind. too easy

What's too easy? Excusing parents for their irresponsible behavior. Why are you so against holding parents accountable. I've stated 5 million times that food should be provided to parents that cannot afford it. Why is it so outrageous to expect the parents to feed their children the food we've just given them?
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

What's too easy? Excusing parents for their irresponsible behavior. Why are you so against holding parents accountable. I've stated 5 million times that food should be provided to parents that cannot afford it. Why is it so outrageous to expect the parents to feed their children the food we've just given them?

the last sentence of post 643
not looking to score any points
 
Re: Richest Nation On Earth Can’t Afford Tiny Program To Feed Poor Kids... [W:288]

What's too easy? Excusing parents for their irresponsible behavior. Why are you so against holding parents accountable. I've stated 5 million times that food should be provided to parents that cannot afford it. Why is it so outrageous to expect the parents to feed their children the food we've just given them?

i don't trust the parents. let them eat at the school
 
Back
Top Bottom