• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RFK Jr. says the CDC buried its own internal study which found a 1135% INCREASE in Autism risk from Hepatitis B Vaccine

NOLA Dude said:


“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are too young to be diagnosed [with autism].”

Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.


- RFK Jr. talked about a 1999 CDC study that found a 1135% increased risk of autism among children vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine within their first 30 days of life. The study was conducted by a team of scientists under Belgian researcher Thomas Verstraeten

-He said the CDC kept the study secret and manipulated it through five different iterations in an attempt to bury the link. One specific tactic he mentioned was getting rid of all the older children from the study, leaving only younger children who were too young to be diagnosed with autism, which skewed the results.

-He said the CDC stratified the data in ways that further obscured the link such as looking at specific subsets of the population that would not show the same risk.

This is evil and there is a special place in hell for the people who were involved in this.

Full Tucker interview:



(6:46) Uncovering the Reason for Skyrocketing Rates of Autism
(13:41) How Big Pharma Enslaves Doctors and Profits off Sickness
(24:22) Is It Possible to End the Corrupt Relationship Between Big Pharma and Corporate Media?
(33:35) Will RFK End Vaccine Company’s Lawsuit Immunity?
(38:37) The Most Damaging Vaccine in History
(47:49) Will There Be Compensation for the Vaccine-Injured?
(53:47) Did the Covid Vaccine Kill More People Than It Saved?
(57:50) RFK’s Firing of So-Called “Experts”
(1:01:58) How Big Pharma Makes Billions off the Vaccine Schedule
(1:05:08) The Real Reason Fauci Got a Pardon
(1:10:42) When Will We See the Declassification of the JFK, RFK, and MLK Files?
(1:20:51) How Trump Is Transforming Washington
Click to expand...

He is lying to you.
 
Loulit01 said:
Trump appointed RFKrazy who is tossing unproven allegations at Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson made a fortune slinging unfounded accusations until even Rupert Murdoch couldn't take him anymore and fired his lying ass.

And I'm supposed to give this crap a fair hearing and take it seriously? Sorry, I was born at night, but not last night.
Click to expand...
This is where I remind everyone that Tucker Carlson claimed that he was physically wounded from a demon attacking him in his sleep.
 

RFK Jr. says the CDC buried its own internal study which found a 1135% INCREASE in Autism risk from Hepatitis B Vaccine​


And where is this study he cited?
 
NOLA Dude said:
More on thimerosal:



Thimerosal contains ethylmercury, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and metabolizes into the most toxic form of mercury—twice as fast as methylmercury.

One flu shot could deliver 25 mcg of ethylmercury—25,000 times the EPA’s safety limit for drinking water.

Although thimerosal was phased out of all routine childhood vaccines by 2001, it remained in many flu shots given to kids and pregnant women.

Finally, the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee (ACIP) has voted to remove thimerosal from all flu vaccines going forward.

This is a long-overdue win for public health.
Click to expand...

Decisions made by cranks who came up with a reason and ignored the mountain of evidence that contradicts their unfounded belief.
 
Slartibartfast said:
You would get more interest if you discussed the science rather than trying to make things into a loyalty test. The relevant questions is whether this doctor Mike person present good science or not from a science perspective.
Click to expand...
Anyone who is getting paid by big pharma while advocating for big pharma isn't someone to be considered credible or trustworthy. The fact that it has to be explained to you is concerning.

Link to him getting paid by big pharma:

openpaymentsdata.cms.gov

CMS Open Payments

The official U.S. government website that houses data collected and published by Open Payments, a federally mandated program that collects information about payments that reporting entities, including drug and medical device companies make to covered recipients like physicians.
openpaymentsdata.cms.gov openpaymentsdata.cms.gov
 
Nickyjo said:
Can someone post an explanation of anti vaxers claims, or link to information that explains how the anti-vax movement started, and/or their proof of the autism thing? Also, I assume this wasn’t around in the 1950s when we all were getting vaccinated for polio. Amiright?
Click to expand...
The term anti-vax is a term created by big pharma. Anyone who thinks someone is anti-vax if they want safe vaccines looks at this like a religion.

If I want clean and safe water am I anti-water?
 
NOLA Dude said:
The term anti-vax is a term created by big pharma. Anyone who thinks someone is anti-vax if they want safe vaccines looks at this like a religion.

If I want clean and safe water am I anti-water?
Click to expand...
Vaccines are safe.

RFK Jr has made a lot of money convincing people like you that they aren’t.
 
NOLA Dude said:
The term anti-vax is a term created by big pharma. Anyone who thinks someone is anti-vax if they want safe vaccines looks at this like a religion.

If I want clean and safe water am I anti-water?
Click to expand...
Anyone that repeatedly claims vaccines cause autism - despite that claim being refuted over and over and over again- is a conspiracy theory loon.

Just like flat earth conspiracy theory loons.

It is not true. It is a lie. It shows that the individual repeating the lie is an idiot. And gullible.
 
Allan said:
He's relegated to repeatedly posting "TDS".

So sad 😞
Click to expand...
Mr. face planter is still confusing me with another poster. That's your 2nd face plant in this thread. You must be embarrassed.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Thats all your left with after I posted a link showing that doctor was getting paid by big pharma to push their propaganda.
Click to expand...
How about a link to the actual study? When do we get that Mr TDS?
 
Allan said:
How about a link to the actual study? When do we get that Mr TDS?
Click to expand...
Mr Face Planter is back. Are you going for the trifecta to get one more face plant in?

Is that you Joe Biden? I never posted about TDS.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Mr Face Planter is back. Are you going for the trifecta to get one more face plant in?
Click to expand...
You’re the one who came running in here with an X post about RFK Jr says “this study” proves


Where is the study? You bother even taking a minute to find it? You bother even taking a minute to see if this was NEW?

Or did you just run here with an RFK-Tucker piece and expect to be taken seriously?
 
NOLA Dude said:
Mr Face Planter is back. Are you going for the trifecta to get one more face plant in?

Is that you Joe Biden? I never posted about TDS.
Click to expand...
You never posted the study. Kind of sabotages your own thread when you forget to do that.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Still no comment on the subject of the thread. You guys are so predictable.
Click to expand...
I've read plenty of comments on both the subject of this thread and the premise of this thread. Both were accurately called out as spouting unsubstantiated nonsense, your favorite genre. If the paper from 1999 existed, it would have made it to the internet by now. Critical thinking 101.

Also, you do realize RFK Jr. is the subject of your thread, right? When people call him out as a conspiracy nut, they're responding to the subject of your thread. What you're alluding to is the premise of your thread. I know, English is complicated, but these are important distinctions in sentence structure.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Anyone who is getting paid by big pharma while advocating for big pharma isn't someone to be considered credible or trustworthy. The fact that it has to be explained to you is concerning.

Link to him getting paid by big pharma:

openpaymentsdata.cms.gov

CMS Open Payments

The official U.S. government website that houses data collected and published by Open Payments, a federally mandated program that collects information about payments that reporting entities, including drug and medical device companies make to covered recipients like physicians.
openpaymentsdata.cms.gov openpaymentsdata.cms.gov
Click to expand...
Pharmaceutical companies are where a lot of the science is happening and if you want to counter that, then you need to counter it with science.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom