• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RFK Jr. says the CDC buried its own internal study which found a 1135% INCREASE in Autism risk from Hepatitis B Vaccine

You should get someone to look at your talking points machine for you. It doesnt seem to be working. You replied to a post that contained a peer reviewed study that shows the hepatitis b increased autism in the groups they looked at.

Universal hepatitis B vaccination was recommended for U.S. newborns in 1991; however, safety findings are mixed. The association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental report of autism diagnosis was determined. This cross-sectional study used weighted probability samples obtained from National Health Interview Survey 1997-2002 data sets. Vaccination status was determined from the vaccination record. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds for autism diagnosis associated with neonatal hepatitis B vaccination among boys age 3-17 years, born before 1999, adjusted for race, maternal education, and two-parent household. Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. Non-Hispanic white boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to nonwhite boys. Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period. Nonwhite boys bore a greater risk.
So mixed result "study" that still doesn't prove causation.

Yes, we see it.
 
So he got paid once 2 years ago?

lol

What was he paid for those 2 years ago?
Back for more face planting? You should quit while you are behind.
 
So mixed result "study" that still doesn't prove causation.

Yes, we see it.
You are going to be so upset in 6 months after they have the results of the autism study with the data being made public.
 
Back for more face planting? You should quit while you are behind.
No answers then? I looked at your site, it said there was some payment in 2023. It doesn't say what for, but allegedly there's a payment two years ago.

What was he paid for? And how does that disprove any of his arguments?
 
Did you show that what the guy said was incorrect?
Or did you just post citations in support of your ad hom attack on the guy?
I showed that he's literally a big pharma shill and paid like one. I ignore people who are paid shills.
 
You are going to be so upset in 6 months after they have the results of the autism study with the data being made public.
lol

Sure. Why is it going to take 6 months to release it? Is that how long it takes for worm-brain to make it up?
 
I showed that he's literally a big phamra shill and paid like one. I ignore people who are paid shills.
You ignore anyone who says anything you don't like.
 


“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are too young to be diagnosed [with autism].”

Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.



- RFK Jr. talked about a 1999 CDC study that found a 1135% increased risk of autism among children vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine within their first 30 days of life. The study was conducted by a team of scientists under Belgian researcher Thomas Verstraeten

-He said the CDC kept the study secret and manipulated it through five different iterations in an attempt to bury the link. One specific tactic he mentioned was getting rid of all the older children from the study, leaving only younger children who were too young to be diagnosed with autism, which skewed the results.

-He said the CDC stratified the data in ways that further obscured the link such as looking at specific subsets of the population that would not show the same risk.

This is evil and there is a special place in hell for the people who were involved in this.

Full Tucker interview:



(6:46) Uncovering the Reason for Skyrocketing Rates of Autism
(13:41) How Big Pharma Enslaves Doctors and Profits off Sickness
(24:22) Is It Possible to End the Corrupt Relationship Between Big Pharma and Corporate Media?
(33:35) Will RFK End Vaccine Company’s Lawsuit Immunity?
(38:37) The Most Damaging Vaccine in History
(47:49) Will There Be Compensation for the Vaccine-Injured?
(53:47) Did the Covid Vaccine Kill More People Than It Saved?
(57:50) RFK’s Firing of So-Called “Experts”
(1:01:58) How Big Pharma Makes Billions off the Vaccine Schedule
(1:05:08) The Real Reason Fauci Got a Pardon
(1:10:42) When Will We See the Declassification of the JFK, RFK, and MLK Files?
(1:20:51) How Trump Is Transforming Washington

None of this happened lol
 
lol

Sure. Why is it going to take 6 months to release it? Is that how long it takes for worm-brain to make it up?
Oh you are back to the juvenile insults because of your face planting. Lol
 
I showed that he's literally a big pharma shill and paid like one. I ignore people who are paid shills.

iow, you did not show that what he said was incorrect

you just made an ad hom argument and called it a day

your choice, I suppose — can't make a horse drink and all that
 
Oh you are back to the juvenile insults because of your face planting. Lol
You still haven't given any amount of evidence to anything you're saying.

If they have the oh so damning report, why wait 6 months?

lol
 
You still haven't given any amount of evidence to anything you're saying.

If they have the oh so damning report, why wait 6 months?

lol
I know the rabid vaxers aren't familiar with real studies so when you do a real one it takes time.
 
I know the rabid vaxers aren't familiar with real studies so when you do a real one it takes time.
What do they have to do? RFK Jr says it already exists. Where is it?
 
iow, you did not show that what he said was incorrect

you just made an ad hom argument and called it a day

your choice, I suppose — can't make a horse drink and all that
You might use paid shills as sources of information. I don't. I ignore them
 
Lying according to who? The "experts" that are bought and paid by big pharma? Or the media that covers for big pharma due to the huge amounts of advertising revenue they get from big pharma? Or the doctors who get more money the more patients they get vaccinated?
Yeah crazy people and YouTube experts are more believable
 
This is where I remind everyone that Tucker Carlson claimed that he was physically wounded from a demon attacking him in his sleep.
I sometimes wonder if that was an experiment he conducted with his listeners to help determine "Will they really believe anything I say?...wow."
 
Last edited:
You might use paid shills as sources of information. I don't. I ignore them

I suspect you do not actually know how much of the information you get from reliable sources came to those sources via "paid shills"


Glad we're clear that you have only ad homs for your argument.
 
RFK Jr doesn’t have the study.

He is lying to you.
Hmmm...is this like the vaccine "report" he issued that cited studies that don't exist?
 
More from the interview. How does concealing where a virus was created address public health?

 
I suspect you do not actually know how much of the information you get from reliable sources came to those sources via "paid shills"


Glad we're clear that you have only ad homs for your argument.
It's a standard trope with anti-vaxxers, and most conspiracy theorists. When they hear something they don't like or that disproves their disinformation, they have to attack the messenger. Their favorite go-to is the "paid shill" excuse. Once they evoke it, they won't listen to whatever the person has to say. This way they can avoid any information that is contrary to their conspiracy.
 
Back
Top Bottom