• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RFK Jr., HHS to Link Autism to Tylenol Use in Pregnancy and Folate Deficiencies

You said people should just accept the current science behind autism research. What did you mean by that?
We accept just about everything science has taught us, as far as it goes. Tomorrow further research may well advance what we know today. That's how science works; constant questioning, experimenting, testing theories etc. There was a time when we accepted that the Sun revolves around the Earth; advances in science proved the opposite. What are you getting at here?
 
We accept just about everything science has taught us, as far as it goes. Tomorrow further research may well advance what we know today. That's how science works; constant questioning, experimenting, testing theories etc. There was a time when we accepted that the Sun revolves around the Earth; advances in science proved the opposite. What are you getting at here?

I agree with you. I'm asking @BrotherFease what he's getting at.
 
You said people should just accept the current science behind autism research. What did you mean by that?
I would be happy to elaborate. Every year, there are thousands and thousands of studies being published and dissected. The scientific community gathers all the data and forms recommendations for patients and medical facilities. The current belief on autism, based on various studies and paper analysis, points to genetics as the dominate factor. What you see from Trump and Kennedy is that they take one or two studies, manipulate its findings, and then use it for public health recommendations. The Trump Administration is using the Harvard study as their gold standard for acetaminophen for small children and pregnant women. The problem here is that their results were vastly different than the authors of the study. They did find that women who took acetaminophen for pain relief did produce more autistic children, but that the results were inconclusive and felt there were other factors in play. They still recommended acetaminophen for pain. In short, my point is that we should accept the scientific consensus. If the current standard changes, we should adjust our thinking.
 
Whatever studies you believe exist that prove a causal link between Tylenol and autism have not been substantiated by you.
Tylenol studies:

I've typed before in this thread ... several times... that there are some studies that show a solid link and some studies that don't.

This link says it's inclusive overall. Why do they keep doing research if there are ZERO indicators?

Fever:
From what I found so far, sustained extreme internal fever >103 deg is definitely a big issue during pregnancy.

Other:
Over-the-counter Ibruprofen & Aspirin are both not advised during pregnancy, why the extreme focus on Tylenol?
Do I really need to say it? It's political, 100%.
 
I would be happy to elaborate. Every year, there are thousands and thousands of studies being published and dissected. The scientific community gathers all the data and forms recommendations for patients and medical facilities. The current belief on autism, based on various studies and paper analysis, points to genetics as the dominate factor. What you see from Trump and Kennedy is that they take one or two studies, manipulate its findings, and then use it for public health recommendations. The Trump Administration is using the Harvard study as their gold standard for acetaminophen for small children and pregnant women. The problem here is that their results were vastly different than the authors of the study. They did find that women who took acetaminophen for pain relief did produce more autistic children, but that the results were inconclusive and felt there were other factors in play. They still recommended acetaminophen for pain. In short, my point is that we should accept the scientific consensus. If the current standard changes, we should adjust our thinking.

Should we continue to research a possible Tylenol/ASD link?
 
Did you even read my posts before responding to them?

I literally said that they're looking at interaction effects between multiple variables. Do you know what that means?

Nobody is claiming that using acetaminophen in pregnancy is a "guarantee" of creating autism, nor is anyone claiming in this study or in the upcoming studies that acetaminophen is a single-factor that's causing ASD in people.

Jesus....at least fully read everything before firing off a ragepost response.

Also, you should educate yourself on how research works. It is common that correlational variables are identified in earlier studies, and after that, the possibility of those variables having causal relationships with outcomes are measured in subsequent studies.

You and nobody else should be against this process of research playing out. This isn't a goddamned religion for you people to believe in--it's reality. If the evidence is there, the effects will be demonstrated. If it's not, the effects will not be demonstrated. If the validity/reliability of the data is strong, it will show in the metrics of the studies. If not, it will be plainly evidence that validity and reliability measures are weak. This is literally how it always works in research.

Be intellectual and objective about it, and save the emotional behavior of rooting for one outcome or another for sports fandom.

They are not doing any research at all. They are cherry picking research to come up with bullshit to make headlines and distract from real science and medicine. They are motivated only by this and their own whacky beliefs. They don’t care. It is quite obvious. No need to over intellectualize pure politcal performance meant to get meaningless headlines and attention for the Trump administration. It is a joke and we are the victims of it.
 
Tylenol studies:

I've typed before in this thread ... several times... that there are some studies that show a solid link and some studies that don't.

This link says it's inclusive overall. Why do they keep doing research if there are ZERO indicators?

Fever:
From what I found so far, sustained extreme internal fever >103 deg is definitely a big issue during pregnancy.

Other:
Over-the-counter Ibruprofen & Aspirin are both not advised during pregnancy, why the extreme focus on Tylenol?
Do I really need to say it? It's political, 100%.
There are three antipyretics- aspirin, acetominophen and NSAIDS like ibuprofen.

Aspirin and NSAIDS are associated with a whole host of adverse effects in pregnancy, and NSAIDs are pretty much absolutely contraindicated, especially late in pregnancy where they can cause premature labor.

That leaves one safe antipyretic/analgesic - acetominophen. And from the looks of the data I’ve seen, the association with autism is pretty weak.

Taking away the last analgesic/antipyritic based on woo woo from politicians as opposed to a trained panel of experts is profoundly stupid, and framing it as ‘anti Trump’ is beyond pathetic.
 
The comparison to thalidomide is inaccurate.
The only comparison meant to be drawn is that Thalidomide was initially thought to be benign but turned out that it wasn't.
It may, or may not, be the same for Tylenol.
Simply shutting down the question raised isn't science, and isn't the scientific process.

I'd be interested in why exactly the explosion of autism in US children, but no such similar explosion of autism elsewhere on the globe.
What is it about the US then?

I seldom quote so much but please read these words: The full article can be found at:
or

In more than two decades of research on the use of acetaminophen in pregnancy, not a single reputable study has successfully concluded that the use of acetaminophen in any trimester of pregnancy causes neurodevelopmental disorders in children. In fact, the two highest-quality studies on this subject—one of which was published in JAMA last year—found no significant associations between use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and children’s risk of autism, ADHD, or intellectual disability.

“The studies that are frequently pointed to as evidence of a causal relationship, including the latest systematic review released in August, include the same methodological limitations—for example, lack of a control for confounding factors or use of unreliable self-reported data—that are prevalent in the majority of studies on this topic.

Acetaminophen is one of the few options available to pregnant patients to treat pain and fever, which can be harmful to pregnant people when left untreated. Maternal fever, headaches as an early sign of preeclampsia, and pain are all managed with the therapeutic use of acetaminophen, making acetaminophen essential to the people who need it. The conditions people use acetaminophen to treat during pregnancy are far more dangerous than any theoretical risks and can create severe morbidity and mortality for the pregnant person and the fetus."

Again thalodamide was NOT given to pregnant women for the same reasons as tylenol. There was no consideration given to possible side effects of thalidomide on pregnant women but from there was and still is for tylenol.

That said while I absolutely reject the ignorance of RFK Jr. and the people he works with I FULLY CONCEDE THERE IS A LEGITIMATE SET OF GROUNDS TO SPECULATE ABOUT A LINK BETWEEN A TYPE OF AUTISM AND USE OF TYLENOL. I am not here to absolutely dismiss it and provide this example of a LEGITIMATE MEDICAL CONCERN OF THIS LINK:
Well, then there's some common ground between us then.

However, the above studies were debunked.




I again repeat any pregnant woman should speak to their obstetrician about using tylenol and not rely on Trump, RFK Jr. or Nola Dude who I would suggest have limited education or expertise in this topic.
 
We should be studying both biological and environmental factors into autism.

I agree. I think any and all things should be researched to possibly someday determine what is causing ASD. Especially the most severe cases which can be heartbreaking.
 
I'd be interested in why exactly the explosion of autism in US children, but no such similar explosion of autism elsewhere on the globe.
What is it about the US then?
Why are you unsatisfied with the current explanation? The scientific community points to genetics as the common factor. Autism rates have risen partly because of expansive definition, more awareness, and better testing methods. For example, Celiac Disease has significantly risen since 2000 too. More and more people are either Celiac or have the gluten intolerance. Was it because of acetaminophen or is it because of better testing and awareness?
 
I agree. I think any and all things should be researched to possibly someday determine what is causing ASD. Especially the most severe cases which can be heartbreaking.
I am glad we can agree. For now, I think a low dosage of acetaminophen is the best pain reliever for pregnancy and small children. There are no other alternatives with the least side effects.
 
I would be happy to elaborate. Every year, there are thousands and thousands of studies being published and dissected. The scientific community gathers all the data and forms recommendations for patients and medical facilities. The current belief on autism, based on various studies and paper analysis, points to genetics as the dominate factor. What you see from Trump and Kennedy is that they take one or two studies, manipulate its findings, and then use it for public health recommendations. The Trump Administration is using the Harvard study as their gold standard for acetaminophen for small children and pregnant women. The problem here is that their results were vastly different than the authors of the study. They did find that women who took acetaminophen for pain relief did produce more autistic children, but that the results were inconclusive and felt there were other factors in play. They still recommended acetaminophen for pain. In short, my point is that we should accept the scientific consensus. If the current standard changes, we should adjust our thinking.
It might be worth pointing out to these people that autism was first recognised as a condition in the 1940s-1943 to be exact. A certain Dr.Hans Asperger further defined it in 1944. Tylenol/Paracetamol weren't marketed until 1955.
Not a single peer-reviewed study has definitively proven a causative link between those drugs and autism.
 
Last edited:
I agree. I think any and all things should be researched to possibly someday determine what is causing ASD. Especially the most severe cases which can be heartbreaking.

No, the focus needs to be on likely causes, not just a shotgun approach. Or shooting blanks like this administration has done.
 
It might be worth pointing out to these people that autism was first recognised as a condition in the 1940s-1943 to be exact. A certain Dr.Hans Asperger further defined it in 1944. Tylenol/Paracetamol weren't marketed until 1955.
Not a single peer-reviewed study has definitively proven a causative link between those drugs and autism.
My belief is that Autism and Tylenol being linked is purely coincidental. Post Hoc to be exact. Unless there was a new additive to Tylenol or Paracetamol starting in the 2000s, it is going to be hard for me to believe that a pain reliever pill, pretty much everybody takes, is the root cause. But look, I pride myself in being open-minded, I am perfectly willing to hear people out.

No, the focus needs to be on likely causes, not just a shotgun approach. Or shooting blanks like this administration has done.
I answered Josie's question with a more broad based answer, than simply looking at Tylenol.

This administration does no favors on this subject matter -- I agree. Making autism into a dirty word is wrong. Cherry-picking data and studies is wrong. But the bigger issue here is his viewpoint that women need to "toughen up". Even their "gold standard" study recommends Tylenol to women in pain. It is the least impact.
 
Caffeine is bad for your system. It actually increases your blood pressure, causes head aches, dehydration, diarrhea. That is an awful remedy for headaches.
Caffeine only causes headaches if you abuse it frequently and get addicted to it and stop taking it. Many who down too much soda pop and energy drinks or too much coffee have that problem. And blood pressure increase is only until you metabolize it out of your system..
 
WTF does any of that have to do with your assertion that you can’t estimate deaths avoided?

And dont forget hundreds of thousands of exhausted medical professionals. We still need them even if we dont need senior citizens. Now that I've recently crossed into that demographic, I was thinking of just not getting any medical treatment at all, as a civil service.
 
Trump has no medical credentials and has shown time and time again to be incredibly ignorant. You should listen to your doctor first and foremost. Chance what? You want people with fevers to toughen it out? There are no studies showing a provable connection.
“The announcement on autism was the saddest display of a lack of evidence, rumors, recycling old myths, lousy advice, outright lies, and dangerous advice I have ever witnessed by anyone in authority in the world claiming to know anything about science,” said Arthur Caplan of the New York University School of Medicine.
 
It is more than about a label. Dr. Trump and Dr. Kennedy do not want pregnant women or small children to take Tylenol at all. I am not opposed to putting on warnings, but they must be done in good faith and based on careful examination. Dr T and Dr K have not done that. They manipulate data in order to get the results they want. I don’t think putting an autism warming on Tylenol makes much sense. There is no evidence of a common event. The authors of the Harvard study have come out and said that the Trump Administration inaccurately reported on their findings.

Agreed. There's already a warning on the Tylenol bottle saying pregnant women should consult their Dr first. That goes for just about ANY medication I can think of and a ton of other things...by now pregnant women should (and seem to) realize that anything they're exposed to can affect their unborn...and consult a Dr or use caution on their own.
 
I'd be interested in why exactly the explosion of autism in US children, but no such similar explosion of autism elsewhere on the globe.
What is it about the US then?
I think the left is terrified that the answer will come during Trump's second term and his administration will get some level of credit for it.
 
Do you think women take Tylenol for fun?

This isn’t like saying “don’t drink alcohol” - it’s telling women to suck it up when it comes to pain or fevers, etc when they’re going through incredible changes to their ENTIRE BODY.

Pregnancy hurts. Not just delivery - PREGNANCY. Your body is shifting around and stretching and repositioning not only your internal organs but your literal bone structures and ligaments and joints. Your hormones are raging and your entire body and every system in it is working extra to grow an entire HUMAN. (And you’re doing this while also functioning and working, etc)

I can’t even imagine my husband having the audacity to tell me to “suck it up” 😂😂😂. Or even fathom uttering words or thinking “why chance it” and even harboring ANY thought in the back of his mind that if our child wasn’t his idea of “perfect” it would have somehow been MY fault…


But hey, some people blame women for everything so 🤷‍♀️

Stress releases hormones that arent good for the woman or the unborn. Pain causes stress.

"Hormones released during pregnancy significantly impact the developing fetus, influencing everything brain development and temperament to physical growth and long-term health outcomes. Hormones like cortisol and estrogen can cross the placenta, and maternal stress levels can disrupt the fetal stress axis, potentially leading to behavioral issues and a higher risk of chronic health problems in later life. " link link link link link link

And high fever can damage the unborn in many ways as well. But hey..."just tough it out."

It seems so simple...yet, holy shit the desperate attempts to justify more of this administration's fumbling asshatery surrounding science.

clown  car_sf.webp
 
Last edited:
Tylenol studies:

I've typed before in this thread ... several times... that there are some studies that show a solid link and some studies that don't.

This link says it's inclusive overall. Why do they keep doing research if there are ZERO indicators?

Fever:
From what I found so far, sustained extreme internal fever >103 deg is definitely a big issue during pregnancy.

Other:
Over-the-counter Ibruprofen & Aspirin are both not advised during pregnancy, why the extreme focus on Tylenol?
Do I really need to say it? It's political, 100%.
You can type whatever you want. What you are supposed to do is provide corroboration for what you "type"/claim.

This link says it's inclusive overall.

Explain the above.

When you copy and paste excerpts that substantiate your claims - excerpts from credible sources to which you provide the links - about Tylenol and autism, I'll check them out. But I don't do your homework. If you want to establish a causal link between Tylenol use and autism, you do the work yourself.

Btw, you've not yet addressed the fact Temple Grandin was born prior to the availability of Tylenol.
 
Back
Top Bottom