• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Revealed: more than 120,000 US sites feared to handle harmful PFAS ‘forever’ chemicals

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
112,965
Reaction score
103,505
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

fracking_032314getty.jpg


10/17/21
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified more than 120,000 locations around the US where people may be exposed to a class of toxic “forever chemicals” associated with various cancers and other health problems that is a frightening tally four times larger than previously reported, according to data obtained by the Guardian. The list of facilities makes it clear that virtually no part of America appears free from the potential risk of air and water contamination with the chemicals known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Colorado tops the EPA list with an estimated 21,400 facilities, followed by California’s 13,000 sites and Oklahoma with just under 12,000. The facilities on the list represent dozens of industrial sectors, including oil and gas work, mining, chemical manufacturing, plastics, waste management and landfill operations. The tally far exceeds a previous analysis that showed 29,900 industrial sites known or suspected of making or using the toxic chemicals. People living near such facilities “are certain to be exposed, some at very high levels” to PFAS chemicals, said David Brown, a public health toxicologist and former director of environmental epidemiology at the Connecticut department of health.

“Once it’s in the environment it almost never breaks down,” Brown said of PFAS. “This is such a potent compound in terms of its toxicity and it tends to bioaccumulate … This is one of the compounds that persists forever.” One of the sites on the EPA list is the Clover Flat landfill in Calistoga, California, a small community in the Napa Valley area that is popular for its vineyards and wineries. The landfill sits on the northern edge of the valley atop the edge of a rugged mountain range. Close to 5,000 people live within a three-mile radius of the landfill, and many fear the PFAS and other toxins taken in by the landfill are making their way deep into the community. “The water is full of foam and looks soapy and smells funny,” said 69-year-old Dennis Kelly, who lives on a few acres downhill from Clover Flat. His dog Scarlett has become sick after wading through waters that drain from the landfill into a creek that runs through his property, Kelly said. And for the last few years he has suffered with colon and stomach cancer. Kelly said he fears the water is toxic, and he has noticed the frogs and tadpoles that once populated the little creek are now nowhere to be found. “Pollution is going to be what kills us all,” Kelly said.


Many PFAS chemicals are carcinogens or can cause other adverse health outcomes in humans.

They are known for their persistence in the environment. The EPA is only beginning to investigate PFAS contaminations.
 
Capitalism: profit off the product, leave the mess behind for someone else to clean up.


For decades, chemical companies covered up evidence of PFAS’ health hazards. Today nearly all Americans, including newborn babies, have PFAS in their blood, and up to 110 million people may be drinking PFAS-tainted water. What began as a “miracle of modern chemistry” is now a national crisis.


Wooo-hoo!
 
But how are people supposed to treat the cancer they get from business pollution without income from the jobs from the businesses that cause the pollution?

Besides it would be commie socialism to tell businesse they can't poison the rest of us for profit.
 
Most toxin emitting sites, whether active facility or abandoned, are disproportionately near low-income, minority communities. But cons/Reps control the political narrative of the day, so it's the white male that gets the news of being discriminated against and minorities being favored. Even though such as the election laws being passed mostly harm the minorities, though they harm most all those in the lower incomes.
 

fracking_032314getty.jpg





Many PFAS chemicals are carcinogens or can cause other adverse health outcomes in humans.

They are known for their persistence in the environment. The EPA is only beginning to investigate PFAS contaminations.
Everything is a carcinogen.

We should be greatful to live long enough for cancer to be an issue
 
Conservatives:

“That’s terrible….”

“So anyway…”

They'll say they wouldn't wish cancer on anyone. Then they back any idiot who screams about slashing regulations for the sake of slashing regulations, with no regard for which or why.
 
Those couches and such that you see dumped on the side of the road ...

How about your dental floss?


PFAS.png
 
Capitalism: profit off the product, leave the mess behind for someone else to clean up.

It's not just capitalism that does that. The problem is industrialism.
 
That’s the GOP spirit! Smallpox didn’t kill us so we shouldn’t worry about not living long anyway.
More like if smallpox was still a problem today you would be calling the vaccine a carcinogen
 
Everything is a carcinogen.

We should be greatful to live long enough for cancer to be an issue
you make posts that i would expect from, like, the church of Satan or something. it's like you have no respect for living and breathing humans.
 
you make posts that i would expect from, like, the church of Satan or something. it's like you have no respect for living and breathing humans.
I do not have much respect for people who fear monger over stuff like this.

You probably didn’t even know what PFAS meant and then the regime makes a report intended on ending more American jobs for the profits of big corporations and suddenly you’re a heroic activist against PFAS sites. Give me a break
 
Capitalism: profit off the product, leave the mess behind for someone else to clean up.





Wooo-hoo!

Clearly what we need is less regulation.
 

fracking_032314getty.jpg





Many PFAS chemicals are carcinogens or can cause other adverse health outcomes in humans.

They are known for their persistence in the environment. The EPA is only beginning to investigate PFAS contaminations.

Another article on the same topic is


Decaying infrastructure and pollution from toxic “forever chemicals” are causing tens of millions of United States residents to drink contaminated water, increasing the risk of cancer and other ailments, according to a new report.


Fifty-six new contaminants, including pesticides and radioactive materials, have been discovered in US tap water over the past two years, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) reported on Wednesday.

Researchers from the Washington, DC-based non-profit analysed data from nearly 50,000 water systems from across the US to draw their conclusions.
which people might find interesting because it includes a search function where US residents can enter their postal code to see the raw data on chemical exposure from their local water treatment plant.
 
Another article on the same topic is

Decaying infrastructure and pollution from toxic “forever chemicals” are causing tens of millions of United States residents to drink contaminated water, increasing the risk of cancer and other ailments, according to a new report.​
Fifty-six new contaminants, including pesticides and radioactive materials, have been discovered in US tap water over the past two years, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) reported on Wednesday.​
Researchers from the Washington, DC-based non-profit analysed data from nearly 50,000 water systems from across the US to draw their conclusions.​
which people might find interesting because it includes a search function where US residents can enter their postal code to see the raw data on chemical exposure from their local water treatment plant.


Thanks for adding the al-Jazeera article to quash criticism from those that consider The Guardian too far left and lib-biased.
 

Many PFAS chemicals are carcinogens or can cause other adverse health outcomes in humans.

They are known for their persistence in the environment. The EPA is only beginning to investigate PFAS contaminations.
Add it to the "existential threat" list.
 
Clearly what we need is less regulation.
"Overall, we rate the Environmental Working Group Left Biased and a strong Pseudoscience website based on the promotion of ideas and claims that oppose science consensus. (D. Van Zandt 5/10/2017) Updated (5/13/2021)"
 
Thanks for adding the al-Jazeera article to quash criticism from those that consider The Guardian too far left and lib-biased.

Oh Hell, there are Americans who consider the Globe & Mail to be too far left and lib-biased.
 
"Overall, we rate the Environmental Working Group Left Biased and a strong Pseudoscience website based on the promotion of ideas and claims that oppose science consensus. (D. Van Zandt 5/10/2017) Updated (5/13/2021)"

You might want to do two things

and​
[2] link to the site (Media Bias / Fact Check) where you plagiarized the material in your post.​

Now, if someone does follow the link that was in my post, and they see what the actual contaminant rating is for their area, does it matter if the link was on a "left-wing" or a "right-wing" website?
 
Back
Top Bottom