You think the NYT that pushed the bullshit Russia collusion narrative, Joe Biden is fine cognitively and Saddam had WMD discredits declassified Obama administration documents? Seriously?
Do you have a comment about the subject of this thread?
Everything he posted was accurate. If you don't think it was point out specifically what you think wasn't. I bet you won't.
Hard evidence? Whats that mean? Did he prove it in a court of law? Nope so that claim is meaningless.
Its laughable you think the NYT spin discredits declassified Obama administration documents.
I'm not sure, but we know that the Hillary created discredited Steele Dossier was included in the ICA as well as FISA warrants. What's your point?
The Federalist as a source.....
The Federalist - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
Yes, this is my comment.
There's no reason to believe what anyone says anymore. All politicians on both sides are liars, and their loyal media outlets lie right along with them. This is all a stupid game they play to try to manipulate voters. None of it is worth anything, and no one will ever be held accountable for any of it.
And you still are unable to address the facts in the article. No matter what you think of the NYT
Both sides are equally content to post any type of content, no matter how questionable, as long as it vilifies the other side. What reason do any of us have to take it seriously. It's all just political propaganda, from both sides, designed to manipulate our emotions and stoke our outrage. I'm not buying it anymore.
Who cares? Are you insinuating doing business in Russia or lying about it is illegal?
It has nothing to do with the Hillary created Russia collusion hoax.
Oh okay. Is the sky really blue or is that fake too?
How would I do that when it's behind a paywall?
It was literally in the ICA and FISA warrants. Your weak attempts to spin that they didn't really use the Steele Dossier isn't working.
You can keep asking that question over and over like it somehow cancels out the Hillary created Steele Dossier being included in the ICA and FISA warrants.
We'd never know, because the media would just lie to us and say that blue means something different than what it always did before.
"It is a well known fact that reality has liberal bias." -- Stephen Colbert
The New York Times is far more reliable than The Federalist, your OP source.
Is anyone surprised? What you thought these men wouldn't cheat to maintain power? Keep it for themselves and keep it for the party. The hate of Trump, the love of power simply let them convinced themselves that the lie was justified.CIA officers warned Brennan about the shoddy nature of the sentence fragment, and initially omitted the fragment in the report. But Brennan personally demanded the fragment be included.
The Russia hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility, according to a report declassified by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard.
The report makes clear that former President Barack Obama and his jackboots henchmen — former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan, former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper — force-fabricated a lie about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s supposed “preference” for then-candidate Donald Trump to win the 2016 election.
With direct interference from Brennan and Obama himself, the Obama administration pushed this narrative as a way to undermine the entire Trump 45 presidency, stripping the American people of the leadership they elected in 2016.
....But the supposed backbone of the report was based on a six-word partial quote described as “one scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from a single HUMINT [human intelligence] report — published under DCIA Brennan’s December 2016 order.”
The words were “whose victory Putin was counting on.”
The full quote is “Putin had made this decision [to leak DNC emails] after he had come to believe that the Democratic nominee had better odds of winning the U.S. presidential election, and that [candidate Trump], whose victory Putin was counting on, most likely would not be able to pull off a convincing victory” (bold in original).
The report states that those six words, found between commas in the longer sentence, could not have been properly understood and that “a senior CIA operations officer said of the fragment, ‘We don’t know what was meant by that’ and ‘five people read it five ways.’”
In addition, that entire quote is suspect because it was sourced from a person with a “strong dislike for Putin” and an “anti-Trump bias.” There was also “no other intelligence corroborating it.”
Russia Hoax Built On 'Scant, Unclear, And Unverifiable' Fragment
The Russia collusion hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility.thefederalist.com
Are you kidding me? That’s it? That’s the only classified intelligence they had and no one knew what it meant?
It’s not surprising that they added the dossier to the ICA. They had nothing.
And who determines these ratings? The left. If it doesn't agree with the far, far left then it's a far right extreme source or idea.The Federalist as a source.....
The Federalist - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
Who thinks the liberal hack Colbert is an authority on bias?Barr didn't allow Durham to look into everything. Barr was running cover for the FBI & the DOJ.
Fact: Trump Russian Collusion was a fabricated story developed and pushed by the left, specifically, the Hillary campaign, the Obama administration and his DOJ, CIA, and FBI. Later Biden and his circle would continue this. The lies about Trump, Covid, Russian Collusion all eminated from these sources and were pushed by them largely with the help of the biased left media.
You haven't said why it's fake, and you haven't read it.