Report: Russia Hoax Was Built On ‘One Scant, Unclear, And Unverifiable Fragment Of A Sentence’

[trixare4kids]

Brennan was a horrible person long before Russiagate. Grok on what CIA Whistleblower John Kiriakou has said about Brennan:

1. **Criticism of Brennan’s Role in Torture Programs**: Kiriakou has described Brennan as a strong advocate for the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques, particularly waterboarding, during the post-9/11 era. He stated that Brennan was “torture, torture, torture,” emphasizing a relentless push for harsh interrogation methods, including waterboarding al-Qaida suspect Abu Zubaydah 83 times, which Kiriakou claims yielded no useful intelligence. Kiriakou has called Brennan a “very bad guy” for his role in these programs and for allegedly seeking vengeance against perceived enemies once he became CIA Director.

2. **Opposition to Brennan’s CIA Leadership**: Kiriakou, who worked directly for Brennan twice since 1990, has repeatedly called Brennan a “terrible choice” to lead the CIA. He argued that the agency needed a leader who would move beyond the “ugliness” of the post-9/11 torture regime and respect constitutional principles, implying Brennan was too tied to controversial policies like drone strikes and warrantless surveillance.

3. **Brennan’s Career Ascension**: Kiriakou detailed Brennan’s rise within the CIA, noting that in the 1990s, Brennan was a mid-level officer (GS-14) who faced setbacks, including being fired from a deputy director role in the Arab/Israeli analysis group. Brennan managed to secure a new position during a six-week grace period, leveraging political connections, particularly with the Obama campaign in 2008, to climb the ranks. Kiriakou suggested Brennan’s alignment with Obama, when other senior CIA officials supported McCain or Clinton, helped him secure influential roles, eventually leading to his appointment as CIA Director.

4. **Allegations of Misconduct and Ruthlessness**: Kiriakou has accused Brennan of ruthless tactics, including entrapping sources or pushing them toward extreme measures (e.g., suggesting suicide or using compromising situations) to gain cooperation. He also claimed Brennan favored a clique of “hard-drinking, tough spy wannabes” within the CIA, promoting them to senior positions despite questionable qualifications, which Kiriakou found shocking when reviewing promotion lists.

5. **Russiagate and Other Controversies**: Kiriakou has linked Brennan to the “Russiagate hoax,” alleging he fraudulently targeted President Trump. He also connected Brennan to uninvestigated incidents, such as approving visas for 9/11 hijackers while serving as CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia, suggesting a pattern of questionable decisions.

6. **Personal Vendetta**: Kiriakou believes Brennan harbored personal animosity toward him, stemming from Kiriakou’s 2007 ABC interview exposing the CIA’s waterboarding practices. Kiriakou claims Brennan tried to have him “executed” for embarrassing the CIA, contributing to his prosecution under the Espionage Act, which led to a 30-month prison sentence for disclosing an undercover agent’s identity.

John Brennan is evil personified.

 

[j brown's body]

John Brennan is evil personified.

Why do you say that? Gowdy refers to no specific lie.

 

[j brown's body]

Brennan was a horrible person long before Russiagate. Grok on what CIA Whistleblower John Kiriakou has said about Brennan:

1. **Criticism of Brennan’s Role in Torture Programs**: Kiriakou has described Brennan as a strong advocate for the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques, particularly waterboarding, during the post-9/11 era. He stated that Brennan was “torture, torture, torture,” emphasizing a relentless push for harsh interrogation methods, including waterboarding al-Qaida suspect Abu Zubaydah 83 times, which Kiriakou claims yielded no useful intelligence. Kiriakou has called Brennan a “very bad guy” for his role in these programs and for allegedly seeking vengeance against perceived enemies once he became CIA Director.

Donald Trump Defends Torture at Republican Debate

Donald Trump defended waterboarding, torture and killing terrorists' families at the Fox Republican debate Thursday.

time.com

 

[Luce]

CIA officers warned Brennan about the shoddy nature of the sentence fragment, and initially omitted the fragment in the report. But Brennan personally demanded the fragment be included.

The Russia hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility, according to a report declassified by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard.

The report makes clear that former President Barack Obama and his jackboots henchmen — former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan, former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper — force-fabricated a lie about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s supposed “preference” for then-candidate Donald Trump to win the 2016 election.

With direct interference from Brennan and Obama himself, the Obama administration pushed this narrative as a way to undermine the entire Trump 45 presidency, stripping the American people of the leadership they elected in 2016.

....But the supposed backbone of the report was based on a six-word partial quote described as “one scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from a single HUMINT [human intelligence] report — published under DCIA Brennan’s December 2016 order.”

The words were “whose victory Putin was counting on.”

The full quote is “Putin had made this decision [to leak DNC emails] after he had come to believe that the Democratic nominee had better odds of winning the U.S. presidential election, and that [candidate Trump], whose victory Putin was counting on, most likely would not be able to pull off a convincing victory” (bold in original).

The report states that those six words, found between commas in the longer sentence, could not have been properly understood and that “a senior CIA operations officer said of the fragment, ‘We don’t know what was meant by that’ and ‘five people read it five ways.’”

In addition, that entire quote is suspect because it was sourced from a person with a “strong dislike for Putin” and an “anti-Trump bias.” There was also “no other intelligence corroborating it.”

Russia Hoax Built On 'Scant, Unclear, And Unverifiable' Fragment

The Russia collusion hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility.

thefederalist.com

Are you kidding me? That’s it? That’s the only classified intelligence they had and no one knew what it meant?

It’s not surprising that they added the dossier to the ICA. They had nothing.

Very interesting.

Now the Epstein files should be released.

 

[j brown's body]

No, we don’t agree because it’s not up to either of us to know what specific crime(s) are involved yet.

You can't agree there is no crime but can't name one.

 

[trixare4kids]

Why do you say that?

Read the thread, the text and links provided for you and then you tell us why he isn’t evil or you go troll some other forum thread.

 

[j brown's body]

Read the thread, the text and links provided for you and then you tell us why he isn’t evil or you go troll some other forum thread.

A response to the tweets you call "text."

"The new review hits the ICA for having included in its annex a two-page summary of the Steele Dossier—the unconfirmed memos a former British intelligence officer had compiled on Trump and Russia. This material had been attached with a disclaimer that it was not used “to reach the analytic conclusions.” Still, the review points out that by referencing this material as support for the judgment that Putin “aspired” to help Trump triumph, “the ICA implicitly elevated unsubstantiated claims to the status of credible supporting evidence, compromising the analytical integrity of the judgment.”

The authors of the tradecraft review have a point here. The Steele papers were full of unproven allegations and probably should not have been referenced in this fashion. But this two-page summary did not appear in the unclassified version released to the public. And it was not the sole basis for any assertion in the ICA."

Link

 

[trixare4kids]

You can't agree there is no crime but can't name one.

Perjury, lying while under oath but you’d know this if you were following the information and links already posted to the thread.

 

[iguanaman]

to you it's all bullshit. to others its a discussion -what makes you so righeous to spam a thread with trash, instead of just contributing to threads you find comment worthy.If i criticized you further id get point

Rewriting history by ignoring the facts and making up new ones is not a something that can or needs to be discussed. It is yet another example of a man in power who wants to rewrite history so he looks better. Nothing more than that. It is as stupid as Kim Jong-il teaching children that he invented the desk so children may learn. The hard evidence presented in the Mueller Report and the Bipartisan Senate Report on Russian interference in the election were not based at all on the Steele Dossier. It is a red herring.

 

[j brown's body]

Perjury, lying while under oath but you’d know this if you were following the information and links already posted to the thread.

You honestly cannot summarize a specific charge?

Look. "Trump pressured his vice president to violate the Constitution."

Its simple. But you got nothing.

 

[j brown's body]

Rewriting history by ignoring the facts and making up new ones is not a something that can or needs to be discussed. It is yet another example of a man in power who wants to rewrite history so he looks better. Nothing more than that.

They seem content that the 2020 election was stolen from them.

 

[trixare4kids]

You honestly cannot summarize a specific charge?

Look. "Trump pressured his vice president to violate the Constitution."

Perjury but I already mentioned this to you.

Its simple. But you got nothing.

irony

 

[trixare4kids]

A response to the tweets you call "text."

"The new review hits the ICA for having included in its annex a two-page summary of the Steele Dossier—the unconfirmed memos a former British intelligence officer had compiled on Trump and Russia. This material had been attached with a disclaimer that it was not used “to reach the analytic conclusions.” Still, the review points out that by referencing this material as support for the judgment that Putin “aspired” to help Trump triumph, “the ICA implicitly elevated unsubstantiated claims to the status of credible supporting evidence, compromising the analytical integrity of the judgment.”

The authors of the tradecraft review have a point here. The Steele papers were full of unproven allegations and probably should not have been referenced in this fashion. But this two-page summary did not appear in the unclassified version released to the public. And it was not the sole basis for any assertion in the ICA."

Link

Why should we give a rats ass what antiTrumper trash writing conspiracy theorist, Mother Jones David Corn thinks about anything?

 

[phoenix2020]

Mirror meet self.
Mention of what crimes may eventually be charged isn’t the point. The point is we know that conspiratorial lies were told and repeated ad nauseum to usurp Trump’s presidency. Were you okay with the director of the CIA and President Obama disregarding intelligence?

TLTR

 

[phoenix2020]

Very interesting.

Now the Epstein files should be released.

True, but if Donald doesn’t want them released, then who is @NOLA Dude to demand otherwise?

 

[phoenix2020]

Why should we give a rats ass what antiTrumper trash writing conspiracy theorist, Mother Jones David Corn thinks about anything?

Why would we give a rat’s ass what MAGA trash think about anything?

They literally believe that the Haitians of Springfield, Ohio are Eating the Cats.

 

[SCrider]

Every accusation is a confession.

At least use it correctly

 

[NOLA Dude]

Why should we give a rats ass what antiTrumper trash writing conspiracy theorist, Mother Jones David Corn thinks about anything?

Think about how clueless someone has to be to reference David Corn.

 

[Integrityrespec]

CIA officers warned Brennan about the shoddy nature of the sentence fragment, and initially omitted the fragment in the report. But Brennan personally demanded the fragment be included.

The Russia hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility, according to a report declassified by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard.



Are you kidding me? That’s it? That’s the only classified intelligence they had and no one knew what it meant?

It’s not surprising that they added the dossier to the ICA. They had nothing.

Is anyone surprised? What you thought these men wouldn't cheat to maintain power? Keep it for themselves and keep it for the party. The hate of Trump, the love of power simply let them convinced themselves that the lie was justified.

CIA officers warned Brennan about the shoddy nature of the sentence fragment, and initially omitted the fragment in the report. But Brennan personally demanded the fragment be included.

The Russia hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility, according to a report declassified by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard.

The report makes clear that former President Barack Obama and his jackboots henchmen — former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan, former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper — force-fabricated a lie about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s supposed “p

eport states that those six words, found between commas in the longer sentence, could not have been properly understood and that “a senior CIA operations officer said of the fragment, ‘We don’t know what was meant by that’ and ‘five people read it five ways.’”

I

Are you kidding me? That’s it? That’s the only classified intelligence they had and no one knew what it meant?

It’s not surprising that they added the dossier to the ICA. They had nothing.

Those folks, most all of them, had spent a year or more telling everyone what a joke DJT was. They made fun of him in public, on late night shows, at dinners, and all over TV, radio, social media. Now faced with a chance he may win, they couldn't stand it. They took action, and even after he won they had to continue to make him look to be the fool, unworthy of the votes and the Oval. They never have been able to let it go. Even the never Trumpers, the good ole boy system including the old time republicans wanted Trump to do poorly. After all Hillary was one of them, Trump wasn't. So they went along, and even joined in on things like Collusion, and the on the Jan6 th mess. They had to get Trump out to justify their hate. They managed to dramatically affect the outcome of the 2020 election with these fabrications, lying about the China virus, Keeping Biden mostly hidden, and continuing to push all the storied they knew were false. They added to it with the 4 trials taht really were cries for help because they knew he would be back . Even resorting to changing laws in NY so they could bring charges, having Trump pursued on classified document charges even though Hillary, and Biden had much more serious issues in that area. They only went after Trump for the same things the others did. Why? First Obama's administratin and then Biden's were dead set on ruining him and getting him out and keeping him out. They lost that battle, Trumps back and yet they continue to create one fabrication after another with little to no verifed evidence. Anonymous sources, CNN reports from a source, but never names, never details, never verifications just source. So the latest is Epstein, yet they didn't reveal anything when they had the files, the Biden team didn't bring it up, but now they said we need too, until today when they voted against a bill to declassified the Grand Jury files on Epstien. Why. You all know why. Either they are guilty as sin or hey know they have nothing on trump.

 

[NOLA Dude]

1. The Single-Source ‘Fragment‘
2. The Anonymous Ukrainian Tip
3. The ‘Putin Inner Circle’ Fantasy
4. The Steele Dossier
5. Brennan’s Most Brazen Deception:

As bad as all this is, the most brazen abuse may be buried in a footnote.

According to the HPSCI report, Brennan personally blocked two HUMINT reports — presumably because they contradicted his narrative — from being formally disseminated.

From the report:

“CIA officers also said that DCIA [Brennan] personally directed that two of the most important reports not be formally disseminated … By briefing information orally, however, DCIA could have tailored his message to different officials, unconstrained by a consistent record copy.”

This isn’t run-of-the-mill fudging. It’s a calculated abuse of power. There’s little doubt that DOJ officials handling the Brennan criminal referrals will now zero in on this footnote, which stands as prima facie evidence of deliberate deception.

 

[NOLA Dude]

 

[Erod]

No one is buying it. That’s all.

Actually, everybody is buying it and knew along except for demented liberals who lack all integrity.

 

[NOLA Dude]

Actually, everybody is buying it and knew along except for demented liberals who lack all integrity.

They have all been exposed as frauds, liars, or people willing to continue the lie even after being exposed as complete horseshit.

 

[Luce]

Actually, everybody is buying it and knew along except for demented liberals who lack all integrity.

No. This is just another attempt at a diversion from the fact that Trump is a pedophile.

 

[NOLA Dude]

Only controversy is the tan suit amrite?