to you it's all bullshit. to others its a discussion -what makes you so righeous to spam a thread with trash, instead of just contributing to threads you find comment worthy.If i criticized you further id get point
too many to ignore. it's become the modus operandi.
I have a big list of people here on ignore. It makes it easier to deal with.
They all complain, but they rarely can point out anything that's inaccurate.
No one is kidding you. You just believe everything you read. Try reading different sources.CIA officers warned Brennan about the shoddy nature of the sentence fragment, and initially omitted the fragment in the report. But Brennan personally demanded the fragment be included.
The Russia hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility, according to a report declassified by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard.
The report makes clear that former President Barack Obama and his jackboots henchmen — former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan, former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper — force-fabricated a lie about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s supposed “preference” for then-candidate Donald Trump to win the 2016 election.
With direct interference from Brennan and Obama himself, the Obama administration pushed this narrative as a way to undermine the entire Trump 45 presidency, stripping the American people of the leadership they elected in 2016.
....But the supposed backbone of the report was based on a six-word partial quote described as “one scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from a single HUMINT [human intelligence] report — published under DCIA Brennan’s December 2016 order.”
The words were “whose victory Putin was counting on.”
The full quote is “Putin had made this decision [to leak DNC emails] after he had come to believe that the Democratic nominee had better odds of winning the U.S. presidential election, and that [candidate Trump], whose victory Putin was counting on, most likely would not be able to pull off a convincing victory” (bold in original).
The report states that those six words, found between commas in the longer sentence, could not have been properly understood and that “a senior CIA operations officer said of the fragment, ‘We don’t know what was meant by that’ and ‘five people read it five ways.’”
In addition, that entire quote is suspect because it was sourced from a person with a “strong dislike for Putin” and an “anti-Trump bias.” There was also “no other intelligence corroborating it.”
Russia Hoax Built On 'Scant, Unclear, And Unverifiable' Fragment
The Russia collusion hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility.thefederalist.com
Are you kidding me? That’s it? That’s the only classified intelligence they had and no one knew what it meant?
It’s not surprising that they added the dossier to the ICA. They had nothing.
Feel free to point out anything thats inaccurate. Oh right, you are unable to do that.
Yeah, I'm thinking Obama, Brennan and Comey are looking everywhere for a squirrel...anything to take the heat off of them.
one way to skin a cat. but the fact of Spamarama remains
Brennan and Comey should be extra nervous. They don't have the immunity protection that Obama has.
You believe the federalist, I believe the Senate Report (even though it was put together by Republicans).Feel free to point out anything thats inaccurate. Oh right, you are unable to do that.
It’s clear that criminal Investigations only matter to the antiTrumps when their side is conducting them. If this is a distraction they shouldn’t be trying so hard to obstruct threads that are discussing subject matter they obviously won’t tolerate.
Discuss away, but you'll be wasting your time on what is designed to distract you.
Feel free to point out anything thats inaccurate. Oh right, you are unable to do that
They had the media sewn up and they also had social media in their hip pockets, Twitter and Facebook. Let’s also not forget partisan spies like John Brennan who depended on the echo chamber to spread his manure, “the victory Putin was counting on”.CIA officers warned Brennan about the shoddy nature of the sentence fragment, and initially omitted the fragment in the report. But Brennan personally demanded the fragment be included.
The Russia hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility, according to a report declassified by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard.
The report makes clear that former President Barack Obama and his jackboots henchmen — former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan, former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper — force-fabricated a lie about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s supposed “preference” for then-candidate Donald Trump to win the 2016 election.
With direct interference from Brennan and Obama himself, the Obama administration pushed this narrative as a way to undermine the entire Trump 45 presidency, stripping the American people of the leadership they elected in 2016.
....But the supposed backbone of the report was based on a six-word partial quote described as “one scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from a single HUMINT [human intelligence] report — published under DCIA Brennan’s December 2016 order.”
The words were “whose victory Putin was counting on.”
The full quote is “Putin had made this decision [to leak DNC emails] after he had come to believe that the Democratic nominee had better odds of winning the U.S. presidential election, and that [candidate Trump], whose victory Putin was counting on, most likely would not be able to pull off a convincing victory” (bold in original).
The report states that those six words, found between commas in the longer sentence, could not have been properly understood and that “a senior CIA operations officer said of the fragment, ‘We don’t know what was meant by that’ and ‘five people read it five ways.’”
In addition, that entire quote is suspect because it was sourced from a person with a “strong dislike for Putin” and an “anti-Trump bias.” There was also “no other intelligence corroborating it.”
Russia Hoax Built On 'Scant, Unclear, And Unverifiable' Fragment
The Russia collusion hoax was built on a six-word sentence fragment that entirely lacked context or credibility.
Are you kidding me? That’s it? That’s the only classified intelligence they had and no one knew what it meant?
It’s not surprising that they added the dossier to the ICA. They had nothing.
What should former CIA director John Brennan be charged with?
