• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report: Neda Soltan's family forced out of home

I have no idea about Shia Islam and the sharia they follow.
Nor do I. Thus the imperative for the inquiry.

If the actions of the Islamic Republic may properly stand justified under Shari'ah, they may fairly be commended for devotion to their faith.

If the actions of the Islamic Republic may not be justified under Shari'ah, they may be fairly condemned for despising their faith.

In similar fashion, Mousavi and the protesters stand justified or condemned, according to Shari'ah.

Both sides should rise to the challenge of justifying all they have done within the context of Shari'ah. They claim Shari'ah as their standard; let them seek justification on that standard.
 
If they followed Islamic law or the Sharia, they wouldn't be Jihadists.

Very true. This can be related to any form of religious extremism.

When it comes down to Sharia its often the interpretation, or train of thought driven by a particular imam or preacher. Suffice to say some are far more extreme than other.

Paul
 
Back
Top Bottom