• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reid Compares Opponents of Health Care Reform to Supporters of Slavery


You seem to have confused historical slavery with political rhetoric.
 
Why does everyone always equate slavery with the plight of Africans in the new world?.....
It went on for thousands of years before Columbus got here....
 
health care reform is the first example which comes to mind

what reforms has the republican party offered up to improve access to healthcare for those who are now without it?

Quite frankly most of us don't consider the present bills being offered by this administration and this congress as improving access to healthcare. They force this on the country at their own peril.

source

 
Why does everyone always equate slavery with the plight of Africans in the new world?.....
It went on for thousands of years before Columbus got here....

It continues in various parts of the world today.
 

Democrats are bitter and desperate it appears.

For Reid to be trotting out these ridiculous comparisons, one has to think this bill is about to go under.

Which would be a good thing by the way.
 
Last edited:
Ted Stryker said:
Liberals/Democrats still treat blacks as inferior,.....

Oh??? How many black Republicans are there in the U. S. Congress?
 
i can't stand reid
yes, he is a partisan democrat
he is also a crook

but that i agree with his comments regarding the republican partisanship and opposition to positive change for America's society in no way implies i defend reid or his ilk

So, you consider destroying the healthcare system of the United States to be "positive social change"! Doctors will retire early, young doctor prospects will pick more lucrative fields (if anything is lucrative after Obama is finished). Rationed medicine will not help the indigent - it will merely make it impossible for those who earn their keep in America to obtain adequate healthcare.

Hey Dems... whatever you do, don't upset the trial lawyers by digging into one of the leading accelerators of health care costs: frivolous lawsuits by trial lawyers!
 

It's hell when the truth hurts... ain't it!
 
Senator Reid's analogy was horrible and misplaced. It is yet another example of the extreme rhetoric from all sides that has tarnished U.S. political discourse. The personalization, exaggeration, and demonization that substitutes for a rigorous and focused discussion on ideas and positions is not constructive.
 
Reid may have been making his point somewhat at the expense of his own party's historical leanings, and I have my doubts that he is ignorant of the history of slavery and politics in the USA.
Not defending him, just trying to take out some of the heated rhetoric.
Social change is, and will always be, hard to achieve...
 
It seems that the hyper-partisan hacks now use the Breaking News forum to post their partisan smear jobs as 'news'-worthy items.

Is any mod every going to do anything?

Something a senator said off the cuff or out of context is not 'news'. It's not even a story. It's just a quote.

The BN guidelines need to be reformed so we don't have to wade through this garbage.
 
It seems that the hyper-partisan hacks now use the Breaking News forum to post their partisan smear jobs as 'news'-worthy items.
:stop: You are among the worst of the partisans on this forum, and are wrong most of the time while doing it. I have already watched you condescend to a few posters on this forum and trying that same old "party switch" crap. I guess you must have missed the Robert Byrd N-word rant from only a few years ago, then the Harry Reid statement, and of course there is the race baiters from Jackson to Sharpton to Farrakhan to Obama, oh, and then there is that elitist attitude like you possess(which I can't figure out with your lack of critical thinking skills) that assumes that not only blacks can't do anything without gubment help, but neither can the "unwashed masses", face it, your little nutless wonder shot himself in the foot, and will probably be put to pasture because of his idiocy.

Something a senator said off the cuff or out of context is not 'news'. It's not even a story. It's just a quote.
I guess you don't understand the concept of an "out of context quote". There is NO contextual way this could have been less offensive.
 

I don't have a problem with this article. This wasn't "off the cuff" or "out of context." Reid is just your basic loose canon at this point and it's not the first time.
 

Especially when it's forced on an unwilling public. If you think this issue is bad for democrats just wait till we get to cap and trade. :mrgreen:


source


 
the part about the republicans being partisan and opposed to positive social change
what's not to agree with?
1: That the GOP somehow has the corner on partisanship
2: That the 'social change' supported by the Dms/left is positive.
 
Repeat yourself much?
 
health care reform is the first example which comes to mind

what reforms has the republican party offered up to improve access to healthcare for those who are now without it?
False premise:
-That government-mandated 'change' in this regard is necessarily positive.
-That opposition to governmnt-mandated 'change' in this regard is necessarily negative

You're confusing 'positive' with 'what you want'.
 
It seems that the hyper-partisan hacks now use the Breaking News forum to post their partisan smear jobs as 'news'-worthy items.

This is breaking news. Republicans are asking the Senator either apologize or resign. And rightly so.

Is any mod every going to do anything?

Conspiracy no doubt.

Something a senator said off the cuff or out of context is not 'news'. It's not even a story. It's just a quote.

"A Senator", is the Majority leader in Congress and this follows much muud and unethical processes by the democratic Party leadership.

The BN guidelines need to be reformed so we don't have to wade through this garbage.

A recent member of DB, I would have enjoyed reading some of your anti-Bush rhetoric. What goes around....comes around.
 
I am surprised that people are still shocked by what politicians say. Can it really be that anyone is surprised by a politician of either party comparing their enemies to Nazis, slave owners,..... It is simple politics and always have been. What will be good for the human race and US politics is when stupid statements stop becoming the mainstream news and especially the big story of the day.
 

That is utter BS. Lincoln would support none of the nonsense your party is trying to do today. None of it.
 
That is utter BS. Lincoln would support none of the nonsense your party is trying to do today. None of it.

I would not go as far as to say "none," but Lincoln was indeed a fiscal conservative, though not very conservative socially. He certainly was not a radical slave opponent either, at least not in the Chase and Seward extremes.

But as the war continued he did indeed become much more progressive in his ideology, though not to the point I would call him a liberal. Perhaps a Moderate Republican.
 
Last edited:
If Nevada keeps voting this turd in, it should be voted out of the Union.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…