But i did answer the question. i stated that a right is what two or more people agree on. Not as in your scenario, imposed upon. This has been a truth ever since two or more people got together. You're example is probably something you think you imagined up. You are not that original. Name any war going on in the middle east or africa today or any war that has happened. Where an army invades rights do not exist, where a dictator rules there are no rights. The right to life did not appear because of some god or just is magically a part of nature. It came into existence the moment two or more people got together and agreed not to kill each other.
Dude, no offense, but you need to take some courses in English and punctuation. If somebody else understands what you're saying, maybe they will chime in. I'll repeat this for you:
In virtually every civilized society that you can name, a human life is held in high regard to some degree. Sometimes, if people disagree about ideology, then governments repel or invade other countries and kill human beings. If you asked their defense of such actions, they would cite protection - be it a justification to maintain their religion, culture, etc. Society doesn't just allow human beings to kill other human beings without justification. The regard for life is universal.
NOBODY thinks that another human being is entitled to take their life unless the other human being has a reason - war, punishment for a crime, etc.
When you wake up each morning, you like knowing you can go wherever you want and you would be offended if the cops pulled you over and told you to get off the street because you are a Muslim, Christian, white, black, etc. In America we expect the Right to Liberty because America is known as being
the land of Liberty.
What makes
unalienable Rights truths lies in the fact that most every human being longs for those things. It is inherent in their nature. People brave the death of the ocean, armed border patrol agents, the Rio Grande, etc. just for a taste of those Rights. And when America only allowed white people the privileges of citizenship and the ability to vote / hold public office, people swarmed here from every country on the globe just to be in a country that recognized
unalienable Rights. Those Rights are self evident.
That does not mean that other people won't try and take away your Rights. Understanding that principle, America is the only country I can think of that protects the Rights of the minority against the will of the majority. REAL AMERICANS are held to a high standard. If we are true to our principles, we must be willing to state with conviction that we may disagree with what you say, but we will fight to the death to protect it.
America has gone to many a country, all over the globe, to defend the
unalienable Rights of other people against tyranny and oppression. Sure, others may put your Liberty into jeopardy. That is why nations band together to determine what are just causes to go to war. Most religions (and even the Bible) have pretty the much standards regarding the rules of warfare.
Most of us know, instinctively that we would like to live our lives doing what we want without harm to our fellow man. When another human being imposes on those Rights necessary to live our lives without undue influence and / or interference, we are all equally offended. And so, in our charter of rights and the charter of the rights of man, we agreed on a founding principle regarding what this country was to be about. And, any time you are not enjoying the Rights our forefathers fought, bled and died in order to secure, then you should feel free to use those Rights and seek happiness elsewhere.
opcorn2:
