Question for Fox News viewers?

[bitbuckit]

No if your fox, in fact it is very common. If you want to discuss Fox intentinoally misleading the public, why dont we discuss the other things I posted. Like the colleting a little rainwater, or creeping shraia starting at the taxi cab in Minnesota or something?

I haven't heard of these (again not a regular FNC consumer) what are they? links?

 

[jimson]

MSNBC is pretty biased, but not as biased as Fox. Fox makes up their own facts, while MSNBC doesn't really do that. That has been my observation at least.

That hasn't been my observation. I remember many things, like the time MSNBC altered a video to conceal that a guy carrying a rifle was black and using said video to illustrate concerns about white people showing up at political rally's with guns.

 

[zhak]

Seems you watch FOX as a constant observer.

thanks, WE Agree,,,,,,,, seems like all the people who knock Fox news are Unable to keep from Watching it theirselves',......... lol

 

[MarineTpartier]

To be fair, Bill O'Reilly disputed it every time someone said they thought Gov Romney would win. I don't think I ever heard him say that he thought Gov Romney would win. He did say he thought he could win if he did some things differently, however, Gov Romney never did those things.

 

[Dickieboy]

MSNBC is pretty biased, but not as biased as Fox. Fox makes up their own facts, while MSNBC doesn't really do that. That has been my observation at least.

Check that:



Final Weeks in the Mainstream Press | Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ)

Would appear they were TOTALLY biased...but I could be reading it wrong...

 

[mak2]

They are stories I have seen on Fox that, when you look into them, are either completley unture or not true enough to be recognizeable when you go to the local paper to find out what really happened. The water diversion example. It was indeed a non news spot but was still set up as if presenting a news story to its listeners. Two Fox News talking heads were interviewing a person and his attorney. They presented the case as if the person had divereted a little rain water from his gutters to a small refective koi pond. And evil goobermint environmentalist put the kabosh on the mud puddle. In reality the guy had dammed up a large area and had a fishing and boating lake he was charging enterance fees on. The bad thing was it was causing his neighbors house to flood. For weeks the right wing sites were talking about collecting rainwater from their gutters in barrels no matter what the government says. Fox induced hysteria. The Creeping Sharia stories from Fox are just silly funny.

I haven't heard of these (again not a regular FNC consumer) what are they? links?

 

[JRog]

Anyone who relies solely on one or a small number of media outlets is really doing themselves a disservice.

 

[AGENT J]

Fox is a great news channel. You do have to be able to understand and comprehend the difference between what is being reported and what is being given as opinion. Otherwise you will be lost and think that it is all reported news and form a warped idea of the whole channel. I gather than many who aren't fans of Fox news mix up those two sides of the coin often.

I hope this isnt a defense?
this is like saying you know what tom is a wife beatter but he provides for his kids so well, he coaches youth sports int the community and volunteers at the youth center.

Tom is a good person, You just have to be able to understand and comprehend the difference between what is tom does for kids and the community and how he beats his wife.

thats just plain nonsense and broken logic.

The bias is MORE present in the opinion shows, i admit that fact, which is still FNC but that most certainly doesnt mean there isnt obvious bias in there DOUBLE labeled news programs because there is. :shrug:

telling the truth about what happened and then lying or giving a biased opinion about why, what or who caused it or reason it happened is still biased LMAO. If a person cant "understand and comprehend" that fact then they are already lost.

 

[j-mac]

I hope this isnt a defense?
this is like saying you know what tom is a wife beatter but he provides for his kids so well, he coaches youth sports int the community and volunteers at the youth center.

Tom is a good person, You just have to be able to understand and comprehend the difference between what is tom does for kids and the community and how he beats his wife.

thats just plain nonsense and broken logic.

The bias is MORE present in the opinion shows, i admit that fact, which is still FNC but that most certainly doesnt mean there isnt obvious bias in there DOUBLE labeled news programs because there is. :shrug:

telling the truth about what happened and then lying or giving a biased opinion about why, what or who caused it or reason it happened is still biased LMAO. If a person cant "understand and comprehend" that fact then they are already lost.

Yes, because Rachael Maddow, and Al Sharpton, and Ed Schultz are true anchors that should be highlighted calling election outcomes on the featured night right? give me a break.

I think most people can recognize the bias that comes out of the MSM, or FNS, and filter that out.


This is about what it is always about, and that is liberals hate hearing a voice that disagrees with their take on events, and do everything they can to take that free speech away.

 

[AGENT J]

Yes, because Rachael Maddow, and Al Sharpton, and Ed Schultz are true anchors that should be highlighted calling election outcomes on the featured night right? give me a break.

I think most people can recognize the bias that comes out of the MSM, or FNS, and filter that out.


This is about what it is always about, and that is liberals hate hearing a voice that disagrees with their take on events, and do everything they can to take that free speech away.

wow you just made youself look dumb since i have already equally blasted MSNBC, some of its people specifically and never defended those people then you go on to group "liberals" all together and say they want to limit free speech :laughat:

whip the egg off your face and go back and actually read what is here next time LMAO

 

[j-mac]

wow you just made youself look dumb since i have already equally blasted MSNBC, some of its people specifically and never defended those people then you go on to group "liberals" all together and say they want to limit free speech :laughat:

whip the egg off your face and go back and actually read what is here next time LMAO

Do you disagree with this:

"This is about what it is always about, and that is liberals hate hearing a voice that disagrees with their take on events, and do everything they can to take that free speech away."

 

[melons]

I hope this isnt a defense?
this is like saying you know what tom is a wife beatter but he provides for his kids so well, he coaches youth sports int the community and volunteers at the youth center.

Tom is a good person, You just have to be able to understand and comprehend the difference between what is tom does for kids and the community and how he beats his wife.

thats just plain nonsense and broken logic.

The bias is MORE present in the opinion shows, i admit that fact, which is still FNC but that most certainly doesnt mean there isnt obvious bias in there DOUBLE labeled news programs because there is. :shrug:

telling the truth about what happened and then lying or giving a biased opinion about why, what or who caused it or reason it happened is still biased LMAO. If a person cant "understand and comprehend" that fact then they are already lost.

So you are one of the lost. Because if millions of folks can see it and you can't, then you have obviously missed something.

 

[AGENT J]

Do you disagree with this:

"This is about what it is always about, and that is liberals hate hearing a voice that disagrees with their take on events, and do everything they can to take that free speech away."

of course i disagree because im no where near partisan, dishonest, and illogical enough to believe such lies and nonsense.

since the FACT remains ive seen some "liberals" in this very thread that do not fit your false description why would a person ever agree with that unless :shrug:

 

[AGENT J]

So you are one of the lost. Because if millions of folks can see it and you can't, then you have obviously missed something.

millions of folks? what millions of folks? what millions LMAO
I didnt say there isnt a difference im saying the difference FACTUAL doesn matter as my example proves because it is still ONE WHOLE piece. You are lost to think they are different.

If hitler was great to his grand kids does that make him a good person? of course not because that would be moronic to have a view like that, same thing applies here. LMAO

 

[melons]

millions of folks? what millions of folks? what millions LMAO
I didnt say there isnt a difference im saying the difference FACTUAL doesn matter as my example proves because it is still ONE WHOLE piece.

If hitler was great to his grand kids does that make him a good person? of course not because that would be moronic to have a view like that, same thing applies here. LMAO

Look I lost respect for your opinions early on in my adventure here. The problem with you is that you have little understanding between the difference of an opinion and facts. You push people for the fun of pushing them. Nothing you say holds value to me. So find someone else to pester.

 

[AGENT J]

Look I lost respect for your opinions early on in my adventure here. The problem with you is that you have little understanding between the difference of an opinion and facts. You push people for the fun of pushing them. Nothing you say holds value to me. So find someone else to pester.

that actually makes me happy because any time a poster like yourself is upset about what i posted it lets me know im on the right track and im honest and objective.

the fact is you dont understand the difference and i just proved that and if you disagree you are more than welcome to challenge what i just said with anything factual or logical, or just run away?

so tell me how telling the truth then lying or saying biased things right after something is NOT biased and lying.

Tommy has a blue car, I bet its blue because i heard he does cocaine and i read a study that says cocaine users like blue

the underline part is true and accurate, the bolded part is an opinion, but if i say them together that doesnt make me a true and accurate person LAMO

same thing for the news and thats just common sense, if you cant see that you are indeed lost and the one with the problem LOL

let me know what logic or facts you have to feel differently I cant wait LOL

 

[j-mac]

of course i disagree because im no where near partisan, dishonest, and illogical enough to believe such lies and nonsense.

since the FACT remains ive seen some "liberals" in this very thread that do not fit your false description why would a person ever agree with that unless :shrug:

So the anecdotal example here, or there negates the overarching narrative? Look, Maher just had a panel where they all sat around whining, and moaning about how much things would be better without FNC on the air...Now, why would libs that scream "free speech" at every turn want to stifle anyone?

 

[AGENT J]

So the anecdotal example here, or there negates the overarching narrative? Look, Maher just had a panel where they all sat around whining, and moaning about how much things would be better without FNC on the air...Now, why would libs that scream "free speech" at every turn want to stifle anyone?

and this changes what about the fact that your statement is false and inaccurate?
oh thats right it doesnt, your statement is still false and inaccurate LOL

 

[j-mac]

and this changes what about the fact that your statement is false and inaccurate?
oh thats right it doesnt, your statement is still false and inaccurate LOL

Ok, I thought you wanted to have a conversation...I see you don't....bye now.

 

[AGENT J]

Ok, I thought you wanted to have a conversation...I see you don't....bye now.

of course i do but to do so you have to say something that makes sense, is factual, is logical or supports your false claims, you failed majorly. Its a good move for you to retreat since you cant defend your false claim.:2wave:

 

[melons]

and this changes what about the fact that your statement is false and inaccurate?
oh thats right it doesnt, your statement is still false and inaccurate LOL

The problem is that you usually don't know the difference between your own opinion and fact. You don't show respect to others who hold a different opinion than yourself.

 

[AGENT J]

The problem is that you usually don't know the difference between your own opinion and fact. You don't show respect to others who hold a different opinion than yourself.

this is simply false because i have many great conversation with people that disagree with me, the difference is that are honest, objective and have integrity. :shurg:

some of my favorite people here and who i talk with the most have different opinions than me lol

would you like to try again?

I asked you to logically or factually support your claim and what millions of people you are referring to (you must be very popular) instead you seem to be set on trying (and failing) to deflect away from the reality that your point failed and they cant logically and honestly be separated.

Also please show me these many many examples of where me not seeing the difference between opinion and facts, i cant wait for that either, or is that just another claim you cant back up? If i did i will GLADLY admit i misspoke because thats what honest people do, i have done it before.

Ill keep waiting though, maybe you will still give it an honest try.

 

[melons]

this is simply false because i have many great conversation with people that disagree with me, the difference is that are honest, objective and have integrity. :shurg:

some of my favorite people here and who i talk with the most have different opinions than me lol

would you like to try again?

I asked you to logically or factually support your claim and what millions of people you are referring to (you must be very popular) instead you seem to be set on trying (and failing) to deflect away from the reality that your point failed and they cant logically and honestly be separated.

Also please show me these many many examples of where me not seeing the difference between opinion and facts, i cant wait for that either, or is that just another claim you cant back up? If i did i will GLADLY admit i misspoke because thats what honest people do, i have done it before.

Ill keep waiting though, maybe you will still give it an honest try.

Research it yourself if you want to know the answer. Maybe you could begin with researching the number of viewers that Fox has, I am sure that exceeds the million mark.
You would need to actually watch Fox News to see the difference. You can't prove what you are saying and you haven't even attempted to, so why should I?
I posted my opinion. And you lacked the understanding to note the difference.

 

[AGENT J]

1.) Research it yourself if you want to know the answer. Maybe you could begin with researching the number of viewers that Fox has, I am sure that exceeds the million mark.
2.)You would need to actually watch Fox News to see the difference.
3.)You can't prove what you are saying and you haven't even attempted to, so why should I?
4.) I posted my opinion. And you lacked the understanding to note the difference.

1.)well you just failed again and dont even realize it. What does their numbers of viewers have to do with it? their viewers are MEANINGLESS to your false point and thats a fact.

2.)"Im" one of their viewers, i like fox a lot i think its great entertainment, and i have said that many times and you'd know that if you were honest and actually read posts instead of being biased and kneww jerk LOL

3.) actually i did with my examples but i understand why you wont try because you cant and you will fail and it will further expose you.

4.) you keep saying this lie but yet cant back it up, i asked you to already and said ill gladly admit it if i did it, if i called something fact that wasnt actually fact i have no problem admittiing it.

so again I ask you to try and start this conversation again HONESTLY LOL, lets see if you can do it?

 

[melons]

1.)well you just failed again and dont even realize it. What does their numbers of viewers have to do with it? their viewers are MEANINGLESS to your false point and thats a fact.

2.)"Im" one of their viewers, i like fox a lot i think its great entertainment, and i have said that many times and you'd know that if you were honest and actually read posts instead of being biased and kneww jerk LOL

3.) actually i did with my examples but i understand why you wont try because you cant and you will fail and it will further expose you.

4.) you keep saying this lie but yet cant back it up, i asked you to already and said ill gladly admit it if i did it, if i called something fact that wasnt actually fact i have no problem admittiing it.

so again I ask you to try and start this conversation again HONESTLY LOL, lets see if you can do it?

You should honestly go back and read your prior posts.