• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Queen of Canada

Allan

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
28,683
Reaction score
33,647
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
No, not The Queen but this one...

She travels Canada in a flag-draped RV with an entourage. She greets supporters in small towns, who eagerly film the encounters on mobile phones. She’s called on her disciples to execute healthcare workers and politicians who support mass vaccination campaigns.
To her more than 60,000 followers online, she’s the newly installed Queen of Canada. But to law enforcement and national security officials, she represents the threat that online conspiracy theorists may be all too capable of inflicting real-world harm.

Rest of the article
 
How stupid is she?

Calling for the execution of healthcare workers who she is going to need at some point in her life to treat her medical conditions?

Also, what a complete bitch.
 
How stupid is she?

Calling for the execution of healthcare workers who she is going to need at some point in her life to treat her medical conditions?

Also, what a complete bitch.

How is she not in jail for incitement to commit murder?
 
How is she not in jail for incitement to commit murder?


Probably because no one followed through, making charging her a risky move. Should one of her followers do so she would be in jail very quickly.
 
How is she not in jail for incitement to commit murder?

THE SAME ****ING REASON TRUMP ISN'T.
Seriously, if anyone here posted the kind of shit these two post without batting an eye, instant ban.
On social media, same thing.
In public, get arrested and charged with making terroristic threats.

But Queen Dildo --- or whatever her real name is, and the Vile Orange Pig Bladder are both above the law.
 
Incitement is just that. Nobody has to act on it.

Bullshit excuse to defend terrorism.
Of course nobody "has to" but that isn't the point. The point is, enough people do act on it that it's a clear and present danger to peace and tranquility, and sometimes it's even a danger to national security.
Nobody HAS TO trample everyone when a person screams "FIRE!" in a crowded theater either. They could even remain in their seats and calmly pull out some marshmallows and take advantage of the flames.

Sounds like you wouldn't mind being one of Queen Dildo's minions, why not go check her out.
 
Romana Didulo's extremist cult: What kind of threat does it pose? | CBC.ca
 
Incitement is just that. Nobody has to act on it.


It is a fuzzy line between incitement and free speech. Having the government lose the case would just add fuel to the fire. This group is still upset over the convoy stuff months ago
 
Bullshit excuse to defend terrorism.
Of course nobody "has to" but that isn't the point. The point is, enough people do act on it that it's a clear and present danger to peace and tranquility, and sometimes it's even a danger to national security.
Nobody HAS TO trample everyone when a person screams "FIRE!" in a crowded theater either. They could even remain in their seats and calmly pull out some marshmallows and take advantage of the flames.

Sounds like you wouldn't mind being one of Queen Dildo's minions, why not go check her out.

Not sure what you think I said, but you are about as far off base as you can get.
 
Not sure what you think I said, but you are about as far off base as you can get.
You just don't believe stochastic terrorism is a thing.
There's another much older term for it.... incitement.
 
You just don't believe stochastic terrorism is a thing.
There's another much older term for it.... incitement.
Here's how the Criminal Code of Canada looks at excitement.

  • 22 (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.
  • Marginal note:Idem
    (2) Every one who counsels another person to be a party to an offence is a party to every offence that the other commits in consequence of the counselling that the person who counselled knew or ought to have known was likely to be committed in consequence of the counselling.
  • Definition of counsel
    (3) For the purposes of this Act, counsel includes procure, solicit or incite.
 
I wasn't expecting that. I sounds very much like an actual act of violence has to take place before 'incitement' can be charged.


I expect that if a group planned, procured and was going to undertake a violent act would count. Showing intent, rather than just desire
 
The article is shocking. It's amazing someone so nutty is able to get such a loyal following and entice them for donations.

Lots of ruined lives in her RV wake.

Well if they are really followers I expect their lives were not in great shape before. I doubt they became stupid overnight
 
The Queen of Canada tries to get an interview 😆

 
She told her following to arrest police officers in Peterborough. Didn't work out well for them.

 
Back
Top Bottom