- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 28,659
- Reaction score
- 18,803
- Location
- Charleston, South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Wrong. This has been studied extensively and they have found that people who are able to communicate with their sexual partner in bed have better sex lives, are happier in their sexual activities, practice safer sex, are in healthier sexual relationships, and much more. And this is throughout their lives....
NOPE.
I'm stopping you right there.
This is exactly what I've been talking about all along.
Keep your bullshit perverted ideology to yourself. I don't want any of it.
I don't accept its conclusions as being valid. I don't accept its underlying premises. In a word, I don't care.
Again, I don't know who the Hell you people think you are, but you don't own sex. Sex and relationships are not a science.
They never have been and never will be.
I mean... Really. The sheer arrogance on display here is simply staggering.
This isn't about "safe sex" and it isn't about "healthy relationships." That's been my problem with it all along.
It's about you, and people like you, promoting your "freed love" ideology. You do this because you believe it like a dogma, and think the rest of us peons need to need to have it forced upon us whether we want it or not, so that we can sooner get in line and conform with your particular view of the world.
I'm sorry, but the simple fact of the matter is that you're overstepping your bounds, and people are going to let you know it.
This argument is about you not wanting to recognize that it is important to communicate about sex,
It's not "communication" I object too. I object to your version of it.
No, it is not "fact." It is ideology, that ideologues are trying to push as fact, in order to further their own cultural agenda.
You don't even know what kind of "communication" is being discussed in these seminars.
If they're teaching horny single young men how to more easily "get laid," teaching horny single young women how to better give blow jobs to please them, and encouraging both parties to actively seek out threesomes, I can guess what kind of "communication" they have in mind. :roll:
Again, the position which holds it as being valuable is one of ideology, not "fact."
What's wrong with guys having sex, or girls learning how to better please their partners? What's wrong with threesomes between consenting adults who do it responsibly?
In a sense that affects me personally? Nothing... So long as you keep it to yourself, where it belongs.
The same goes for drinking, recreational drug usage, and whatever else you might happen to be into.
The simple fact of the matter is that there is no reason whatsoever to teach that kind of vice in institutions of higher learning. It serves no purpose.
Plenty of schools have social clubs surrounding drinking (wine/scotch/beer clubs) and recreational drug use (cigars).
If you think good sex is merely an matter of following a set of instructions, you're doing it wrong.
Looks like universities are not the only ones "promoting promiscuity"
Sex toy sale in Kansas delights Democrats, but Republicans not so much | The Kansas City Star
If you don't know how to communicate about sex with your partner, you are not going to do it in all likelihood. We know this from studying people and what they say about sex and how they communicate with their partners or how their partners communicate with them.
And there is nothing wrong with laying out how to make sex more pleasurable in a "how to" fashion, through instructions, so long as it includes communicating with your spouse whether or not that is actually pleasurable for you. If you know how to do something, at least something, going into a relationship, it can help to make the relationship better. That doesn't mean that you need to know every single way to make that other person happy during sex, nor every way that they can make you happy during sex, but rather some knowledge can help to build the relationship stronger to work toward that exploration for more knowledge.
Princeton Professor: Cultural Elite Can No Longer Tolerate Christians | The Daily CallerPrinceton Professor: Cultural Elite Can No Longer Tolerate Christians
“Christians, and those rejecting the me-generation liberal dogma of ‘if it feels good do it,’ are no longer tolerable by the intellectual and cultural elite,” says George, 59, director of the James Madison program at Princeton University. Citing the political witch hunt that forced Brendan Eich’s departure as CEO of Mozilla for a small contribution to a conservative political cause, George said politically correct mobs “threaten us with consequences if we refuse to call what is good evil, and what is evil, good. They command us to confirm our thinking to their orthodoxy, or else say nothing at all.”
Incest a 'fundamental right', German committee says - TelegraphLaws banning incest between brothers and sisters in Germany could be scraped after a government ethics committee said the they were an unacceptable intrusion into the right to sexual self-determination.
“Criminal law is not the appropriate means to preserve a social taboo,” the German Ethics Council said in a statement. “The fundamental right of adult siblings to sexual self-determination is to be weighed more heavily than the abstract idea of protection of the family.”
Exactly the point. It's more than that, but why plant all kinds of crazy ideas in kids heads which will only lead them into more trouble.
Yeah, a friend of my daughter's been hooking up with the help of Tinder, and now has chlamydia.
Of course, that's just fine, normal and healthy then? In your opinion?
These are adults, not kids.
Your daughter's friend didn't have protected sex.[/FONT][/COLOR]
That's obviously true. But where would this idea come from that this commitment less sex is acceptable and healthy (physically and emotionally)?
From my view, it's some very wrong headed thinking, and I don't see where a college class or seminar supporting the idea of threesomes as being the same is really doing any favors for, much less having the best interests at heart, for the young adults they are presenting it to.
What's wrong with commitmentless sex provided it's done by consenting adults in a responsible manner?
I'm not sure that commitment less sex can be responsible.
Isn't sex part of the human pair-bonding, which is the foundation of family?
So all sex out of wedlock is irresponsible? lol
Well it's clearly not limited to it, given that exists.
This argument is about you not wanting to recognize that it is important to communicate about sex, before, during and after, and that this is the main goal of these seminars, teaching college age students how to effectively communicate about sex in order to build healthier relationships.
You are free to ignore the information all you like, but that is what this is about. Your denial doesn't change that fact.
Exactly the point. It's more than that, but why plant all kinds of crazy ideas in kids heads which will only lead them into more trouble.
I'm not sure that commitment less sex can be responsible. Isn't sex part of the human pair-bonding, which is the foundation of family?
That's obviously true. But where would this idea come from that this commitment less sex is acceptable and healthy (physically and emotionally)?
From my view, it's some very wrong headed thinking, and I don't see where a college class or seminar supporting the idea of threesomes as being the same is really doing any favors for, much less having the best interests at heart, for the young adults they are presenting it to.
I'm not sure that commitment less sex can be responsible. Isn't sex part of the human pair-bonding, which is the foundation of family?
There are no "crazy ideas" being planted in anyone's head by these presentations unless you consider using a condom or being a gentleman is a crazy idea. Also, this is college so the presentations aren't being given to children.
The idea that hookups with strangers is a good thing did not come from these seminars. It comes from our culture. These seminars work to counter that culture in a way that isn't going to be completely ignored and makes relationships at least a little bit better, safer, and healthier.
No. Sex is not just about human pairbonding or building families. Sex can be just about pleasure. Not every human thinks the same or feels the same about sex or families or commitment, men and women.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?