- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 102,005
- Reaction score
- 45,500
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Why...what?So you did say that.
Why?
Why...what?So you did say that.
Why?
Why would you say something so obviously untrue?Why...what?
What did I say that was "obviously untrue"?Why would you say something so obviously untrue?
Are you asleep? You said tRump would protect people from corporate greed.What did I say that was "obviously untrue"?
You should push bicycles on the urban population.Trying to keep people driving whether they could afford to or not and bearing in mind plenty quit going out in the best interest of their health and millions began working from home so a ton of driving suddenly vanished.
That was their decision ......now they want to gouge to cover the cost of obscene CEO salaries, Golden Parachutes and stock options. In spite of the fact none lost money ......
Just think one bicycle will last all of our lives and is a healthier choice.
MSN
www.msn.com
The fossil fuel industry looks at war as an opportunity for price gouging as a means to further soak the USA
consumers. Why do we stand for this?
What about K-12, with this merit based system, then we should be pushing school vouchers hard and fast.Absolutely. And I believe in merit government scholarships not loans.
Government scholarship proposal as replacement for the student loan program.
I would like to see a system of higher education were merit (aptitude and hard work) is more important than ability to pay. The better you do the less you pay. A student competes with other students taking the same classes. Your class ranks determines how much the fees are subsidised for the...debatepolitics.com
I already said that I didn't say that. Go back and look at my posts.Are you asleep? You said tRump would protect people from corporate greed.
There are no vouchers.What about K-12, with this merit based system, then we should be pushing school vouchers hard and fast.
Your really want to find yourself being run by a communist/marxist dictatorship don't you!count me in on a yes for nationalizing energy and healthcare ...... absolutely. Both are receiving so many tax dollar handouts we the people must be somewhere on the deeds as owners.
So what is your excuse for the drastically lower prices a year ago? They just suddenly decided to "gouge"?
? Of course there are no vouchers, NOW. You'd have to advocate for a merit based system and allow choice to determine school selection.There are no vouchers.
Biden is a moderate and if Republican moderates would support him he would be able to move more to the center and compromise.Your really want to find yourself being run by a communist/marxist dictatorship don't you!
Put real pressure on elected representatives, stop re-electing those that are not doing what you voted for them to do. Put America first.
Our government has gotten out of hand because it fails to consider what is best for the nation, what they were elected by their voters to accomplish, compromise with the other party.
The vast majority of funding for public schools is local. The management of public schools is local. Do you want the federal government to take over local schools?? Of course there are no vouchers, NOW. You'd have to advocate for a merit based system and allow choice to determine school selection.
Public school is failing our children and the answer isn't more money at a bad system.
Robin Hood guarantees that what you just posted was a lie.The vast majority of funding for public schools is local. The management of public schools is local. Do you want the federal government to take over local schools?
Don't know what that means.Robin Hood guarantees that what you just posted was a lie.
States contribute a total of $344.0 billion to K-12 public education or $6,785 per student. Local governments contribute $322.9 billion total or $922 per student. Federal public education funding is equivalent to 0.31% of total taxpayer income. State and local funding is equivalent to 3.61%.Don't know what that means.
Education is primarily a State and local responsibility in the United States. It is States and communities, as well as public and private organizations of all kinds, that establish schools and colleges, develop curricula, and determine requirements for enrollment and graduation.
According to the US Department of Education, the Federal Government contributes about 8% to funding US public schools.[7] To fund the remaining balance per student in the public education System, state and local governments are mandated to allocate money towards education.[8] The state allocates a percentage of its revenue, from sales and income tax, to use towards education. The funds that are set aside for education are determined by the State constitutions, Propositions, and the incoming Government officials. According to the National Conference of state Legislatures, States provide structure, equality, fiscal accountability, stability and support to the public education systems per state. Each state varies the level of support that the schools receive with the implementation of legislation.[9]
The Local government allocates education funding from the revenue generated by property tax and other fundraising efforts. Local officials have the ability to influence the rate of change of property taxes that are used to fund local expenditures, including education.[10]
Public school funding in the United States - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Your numbers say that 5/6th of the funding comes from the state and local government. Those same "local" governments decide how and from whom it is collected and how much. Local governments can even spend more if they decide to.States contribute a total of $344.0 billion to K-12 public education or $6,785 per student. Local governments contribute $322.9 billion total or $922 per student. Federal public education funding is equivalent to 0.31% of total taxpayer income. State and local funding is equivalent to 3.61%.
K-12 schools nationwide receive $57.34 million total or $1,131 per pupil from the federal government.
You still want to argue that local governments are the ones funding the schools?
State to me is State, not local (county, town, or district) Regardless, they do spend it as such but the Robin Hood program ensures equal STATE funding which is the biggest portion by a good margin.Your numbers say that 5/6th of the funding comes from the state and local government. Those same "local" governments decide how and from whom it is collected and how much. Local governments can even spend more if they decide to.
And Robin Hood is generally considered a hero.State to me is State, not local (county, town, or district) Regardless, they do spend it as such but the Robin Hood program ensures equal STATE funding which is the biggest portion by a good margin.
"The Robin Hood plan was a media nickname given to legislation enacted by the U.S. state of Texas in 1993 to provide court-mandated equitable school financing for all school districts in the state, in response to the Texas Supreme Court's ruling in Edgewood Independent School District v."
Take from the rich and give to the poor. Ala Robin Hood.
Well... sure but back to vouchers. There would be no need for Robin Hood.And Robin Hood is generally considered a hero.
Vouchers don't reward merit.Well... sure but back to vouchers. There would be no need for Robin Hood.
They most assuredly would reward schools that are producing the best students...Vouchers don't reward merit.