The Giant Noodle
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2010
- Messages
- 7,332
- Reaction score
- 2,011
- Location
- Northern Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Pearce believes that guaranteed citizenship to those born in the U.S. does not apply to children of illegal immigrants because such families do not owe allegiance to the U.S.
To be quite honest, I don't believe a man who would propose something this repugnant owes allegiance to the U.S. In this country, we do not dump the debts and obligations of parents on to their children, and we do not deport people who've never lived anywhere else or known any other life. If Mr. Pearce is not okay with that, maybe he had better consider leaving.
Anti-Immigration Lawmaker Seeks Support In ‘A Battle Of Epic Proportions’
October 28, 2010 by Personal Liberty News Desk
Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce (R-Mesa) is collecting support from lawmakers across the United States in an effort to eliminate automatic citizenship rights for children of illegal immigrants.
Pearce has garnered national headlines for crafting the bill, SB 1070, which is widely considered to be the toughest anti-immigrant law in the country. During a news conference on Oct. 19, Pearce said that the government needs to reinterpret the language of the 14th Amendment, The Associated Press reports.
Pearce believes that guaranteed citizenship to those born in the U.S. does not apply to children of illegal immigrants because such families do not owe allegiance to the U.S.
[link to www.personalliberty.com]
In the US, all babies are born free. I don't want that to change. I don't think slaves or the subjects of tyranny should be born here or any free country. What kind of people are we if we cannot protect those born on our land.
Anti-Immigration Lawmaker Seeks Support In ‘A Battle Of Epic Proportions’
October 28, 2010 by Personal Liberty News Desk
Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce (R-Mesa) is collecting support from lawmakers across the United States in an effort to eliminate automatic citizenship rights for children of illegal immigrants.
Pearce has garnered national headlines for crafting the bill, SB 1070, which is widely considered to be the toughest anti-immigrant law in the country. During a news conference on Oct. 19, Pearce said that the government needs to reinterpret the language of the 14th Amendment, The Associated Press reports.
Pearce believes that guaranteed citizenship to those born in the U.S. does not apply to children of illegal immigrants because such families do not owe allegiance to the U.S.
[link to www.personalliberty.com]
Did you look at the links I provided on the historical content of the 14th? One could argue that the child/baby allegiance is with the parents country because they are a minor.
With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child.
Then "allegiance" is not even a valid concept in the case of minors, and the underlying premise of the bill is false. A child of illegal immigrants born in this country has no lesser claim to American citizenship than a child of citizens - unless you wish to claim that the foundational basis of American citizenship is blood, in which case you're entering pretty sinister territory.
Another example where that's only valid if you insist on blood as the determining factor.
A look at the anchor baby abuse industry. First, we should all know that the anchor baby abuse industry long ago was taken over by the marxist/socialist progressive democrats, as part of their attempt to takeover America, and turned into a progressive democratic farm program complete with 18 years of democratic welfare conditioning to ensure that the hispanic anchors turn into future hispanic democratic voters. About 300,000 future hispanic democratic voters are born every year, these days, and go immediately on the 18 years of democratic welfare conditionins. So that means there are 300,000 one year old hispanic future democratic voters, about 300,000 two year old hispanic future democratic voters, almost 300,000 three year old hispanic future democratic voters, maybe 290,000 hispanic four years old, etc, etc, you get the idea, and finally, maybe 200,000 18 year old hispanic future democratic voters coming off of their 18 years of democratic welfare conditioning. When you add it up that's maybe 5 million future hispanic anchors just waiting in line to become future democratic voters. Wake up sheeple. The only way to change the 14th amendment to to first kick to the curb, remove from office, a bunch of marxist/socialist amnesty supporting progressive democratic politicians fighting any and all attempts to stop illegal immigration.
A look at the anchor baby abuse industry. First, we should all know that the anchor baby abuse industry long ago was taken over by the marxist/socialist progressive democrats, as part of their attempt to takeover America, and turned into a progressive democratic farm program complete with 18 years of democratic welfare conditioning to ensure that the hispanic anchors turn into future hispanic democratic voters. About 300,000 future hispanic democratic voters are born every year, these days, and go immediately on the 18 years of democratic welfare conditionins. So that means there are 300,000 one year old hispanic future democratic voters, about 300,000 two year old hispanic future democratic voters, almost 300,000 three year old hispanic future democratic voters, maybe 290,000 hispanic four years old, etc, etc, you get the idea, and finally, maybe 200,000 18 year old hispanic future democratic voters coming off of their 18 years of democratic welfare conditioning. When you add it up that's maybe 5 million future hispanic anchors just waiting in line to become future democratic voters. Wake up sheeple. The only way to change the 14th amendment to to first kick to the curb, remove from office, a bunch of marxist/socialist amnesty supporting progressive democratic politicians fighting any and all attempts to stop illegal immigration.
Your over-the-top rhetoric makes me laugh.
That being said, illegal immigration is hardly a problem that can be blamed solely on the democrats. The last few republican presidents (and congresses) haven't exactly gone out of their way to do anything about it either.
Cuba is a dictatorship, they are political refugees. Are the others?
I didn't write that either was good or bad. I wrote that one is a political refugee and the other is not. Political refugees get special consideration everywhere in the world and are allowed to stay in countries when returning to their homeland would most likely result in them being killed or imprisoned forever simply because they snuck out. It's not like providing political asylum is a uniquely US policy; your comparison is invalid.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?