I'm also not a liberal.
In the 1968 riots, LBJ, the president at that time mobilized the national guard, Obama hyperbole. done.
He stopped him initially for being in the street. He started to drive off and then realized he matched the description of the suspect that just stole cigars.
Now your'e an expert in ballistics ?
He stopped him initially for being in the street. He started to drive off and then realized he matched the description of the suspect that just stole cigars.
The Journalist have embedded themselves , and a few have irresponsibly perpetuated the narrative that a innocent gentle giant was assassinated.
The Police have been vilified by irresponsible news outlets
Try to be just a little objective folks. Take a look at these clips.
Jake Tapper Goes Off on Police Reaction in Ferguson VIDEO | Mediaite
Police Shove CNN’s Don Lemon | Ring of Fire
I can see you ain't been around much, but you're not to blame for your comment, you're probably not old enough to remember any of this, and guess what, it had nothing to do with blacks.
Division Street Riots - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On April 4, 1968, in Chicago, violence sparked on the West side of the city, and gradually expanded to consume a 28-block stretch of West Madison Street, with additional damage occurring on Roosevelt Road. Lawndale and Austin neighborhoods on the West Side and the Woodlawn neighborhood on the South Side experienced the majority of the destruction and chaos. The rioters broke windows, looted stores, and set buildings (both abandoned and occupied) on fire. Firefighters quickly flooded the neighborhood, and Chicago's off-duty firefighters were told to report for duty. There were 36 major fires reported between 4:00 pm and 10:00 pm alone. The next day, Mayor Richard J. Daley imposed a curfew on anyone under the age of 21, closed the streets to automobile traffic, and halted the sale of guns or ammunition.
Approximately 10,500 police were sent in, and by April 6, more than 6,700 Illinois National Guard troops arrived in Chicago. President Lyndon B. Johnson also sent 5,000 U.S. army troops into the city. The General in charge declared that no one was allowed to have gatherings in the riot areas, and he authorized the use of tear gas. Mayor Richard J. Daley gave police the authority "to shoot to kill any arsonist or anyone with a Molotov cocktail in his hand ... and ... to shoot to maim or cripple anyone looting any stores in our city."[5]
The south side ghetto had escaped the major chaos mainly because the two large street gangs, the Blackstone Rangers and the East Side Disciples, cooperated to control their neighborhoods. Many gang members did not participate in the rioting, due in part to King's direct involvement with these groups in 1966
Common sense man. Why was there no bullet that struck the back of the inside of his skull? It went through the eye correct? Did the cop use some magical curvey bullets that make 90 degree turns? If he was standing wouldnt it hit the inside of the back of his skull? It didnt. It hit his eye. Left through the bottom of his jaw. And hit his collar bone. So then... Was Brown flying at the cop like super man with some special power of flight? Did the cop fly straight up into the air and fire down on Brown? Or was Brown lying on the ground with his hands up for the bullet to take this path?
As we have seen with Hatuey (ala the Redskins patent case)...1 previous complaint in 16 years is a massive epidemic...even if it is brought by the same people.... so 2 lawsuits in 6 years, one of which was dismissed? IT'S AN EPIDEMIC!!
Yes, how "irresponsible" of news outlets to complain when the cops are macing them for merely doing their job
So, you're NOT a ballistics expert or an expert in forensics and are simply making this stuff up off the top of your head ?
You actually BELIEVE that a cop would...while sitting in a vehicle...be ABLE to let alone would reach UP and grab a 6'4" 300 pounder and attempt to drag him onto his lap through the front window of a police car? Or that a guy with NO prior disciplinary history would grab a 6'4" 300 pounder from a seated position, around the neck, so he could shoot him.Thats not what the original witness said. At first it was "The cop told him to get out of the street." Brown said he was almost home and kept walking. The cop drove off up the block. Mike was still walking in the street so the cop reversed." This is then when the cop supposedly tried to punk Brown. Buy grabbing his neck and bending him to the car and pointing a gun at him. Then the struggle began.
But some random person calls into a radio show and some convoluted side conversation derailed that.
Jack Tripper nor Lemon have any knowledge of what threats were made prior to the police showing up dressed in riot gear. Also after Trapper and Lemon made their complaints, later it was revealed that large molitov cocktail bombs were discovered in the back of vehicles and buildings did end up getting torched and protestors were firing guns, throwing bottles and rocks at the police. And if the police didn't show up prepared over an alert, would Trapper and Lemon be accusing the cops as slacking on their duties to control the violence?
That's your opinion, which you are entitled to, and which I and a lot of other people (Including the person who sits as the judge on this case.) will ignore
Jack Tripper was John Ritter's name on Three's Company.:mrgreen:
What is real justice? Indicting law enforcement before all the facts are known? That's not justice. That's a lynching.
If this neighborhood were interested in justice, they wouldn't be destroying it.They're opportunistic animals fueled by a sense of entitlement and a Poor Us mentality that makes me ill.
You actually BELIEVE that a cop would...while sitting in a vehicle...be ABLE to let alone would reach UP and grab a 6'4" 300 pounder and attempt to drag him onto his lap through the front window of a police car? Or that a guy with NO prior disciplinary history would grab a 6'4" 300 pounder from a seated position, around the neck, so he could shoot him.
Phenomenal.
nah...come on now. The second part is actually believable..the first?It's just as plausible as the young man running away from the gunfire, then doubling back to dive (literally dive, facing the ground) at an officer while he's firing at him.
Every single person's feedback on this is opinion.
That's all this is - a discussion of opinions. There are very few facts for us to lay out.
Hell - these days even the journalists are juts giving opinions. LOL
But calling any human beings animals doesn't bother you, eh?
Different strokes for different folks.
You actually BELIEVE that a cop would...while sitting in a vehicle...be ABLE to let alone would reach UP and grab a 6'4" 300 pounder and attempt to drag him onto his lap through the front window of a police car? Or that a guy with NO prior disciplinary history would grab a 6'4" 300 pounder from a seated position, around the neck, so he could shoot him.
Phenomenal.
Oh, you're right.Yes, it does. An insult to the logical actions of animals everywhere.
Its hypocritical of you to say the least seeing how HYPERBOLE is the defining characteristic of almost every one of your post on this issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?