It's an embarrassment that it's being portrayed that cops are shooting black youth at an alarming rate.
The rate is like.....almost never.
Completely concocted issue from brainwashed citizenry.
Nearly two times a week in the United States, a white police officer killed a black person during a seven-year period ending in 2012, according to the most recent accounts of justifiable homicide reported to the FBI.
Once again, the police report is not "inadmissible", in fact, it's just the opposite. It's what will be presented to the grand jury. The police are NOT on trial. A single man is. FFS Hatuey, stop.
Really?
Local police involved in 400 killings per year
In short, the police are to black people what Chicago is to black people. :lol:
Sorry Lord Vader, but that's not how it works on this patch of the planet.
Based on your test, testimony from witnesses for the defense should not be admissible since it's known such witnesses frequently lie.
Very early on, I heard it reported that there was one shot taken/bullet found in the car. This, to me, seems to provide credence to the officer's account that Brown was outside the car and in a struggle with the officer in the car for possession of the officer's gun. It's quite possible, in my view, that a number of the bullet wounds Brown suffered in his right arm/hand are also consistent with a struggle for the gun and multiple shots being fired during that struggle. Finally, when Brown lost control he ran, the officer got out of his car and told him to stop, he was under arrest, and Brown turned and headed back at the officer. If I was the officer, just having survived with my life after a struggle with this man, any threatening action by Brown would be met with deadly force, thus the two shots to the head.
This is conjecture and speculation - it seems far more rational and possible than the suggestions being made here and elsewhere that Brown was targeted and murdered simply because he was black.
Wth are you talking about?LMAO - this from the guy who keeps drumming up an alleged robbery as proof of Michael Brown's character. You're showing your inconsistency.
And that is where you repeatedly fail miserably. You absurdly exaggerate when you paint the whole department as such when it doesn't hold true.That's your opinion. However, it seems to get you riled enough to keep responding. It must hurt being told that the Ferguson PD are nothing but a bunch of corrupt thugs, huh? :shrug:
Most people will lie if it makes them look better or saves their good buddies butt.
I can tell you, you are wrong as usual, which of course will just go in one nostril and out the other. So there is no point in that.
So how do you expect to prove such nonsense?
A possibility as of now? No it is not.
It shouldn't be going through the courts at all.We'll see what happens after this case winds its way through the courts.
No it wont be.It will be inadmissible because they've shown themselves too corrupt to handle the investigation at all.
Wth are you talking about?
Brown's character? When have I specifically addressed that?
And what is this nonsense about an alleged robbery?
There was a robbery that he was involved in.
It has been confirmed by his family, cohort and video. There is nothing alleged about that, it is fact.
And that is where you repeatedly fail miserably. You absurdly exaggerate when you paint the whole department as such when it doesn't hold true.
Nor is your absurd assertion relevant to the evidence in this case.
So your continued harping about irrelevancy is ridiculous.
It will be inadmissible because they've shown themselves too corrupt to handle the investigation at all. The fact that they've already been relieved of their duty should be a sign of things to come for you. Think of it this way... the Ferguson PD were not considered competent enough to deal with the situation they created. You think a court is going to take their report seriously? Lmao.
It shouldn't be going through the courts at all.
If it makes it that far it will already have been a travesty of Justice.
Oh my, hearsay from a personal friend of the police officer giving a story that supports his side of things and TheBlaze finding some unknown reporter making more claims from anonymous sources? I'm convinced. I am.
Knowing something is a travesty of Justice does not an any way suggest unhappiness.Like I said, if the cop gets convicted and sent off to the hoosegow you won't be happy.
There wont be any court decision for you to cry over.but I won't cry over it.
Most people will lie if it makes them look better or saves their good buddies butt.
Were they now? When is the arrest for Dorian Johnson? That's right. It isn't.
[/COLOR][/B]
After a cop puts 6-bullets in a man with his hands up, what do you think that cop should do next?
I've posted it a few times, look through the thread. Hell, the latest one was actually caught on video. They threatened a reported with shelling them if they didn't turn off lights which weren't even interfering with them and have arrested journalists only to release them later WITHOUT charging them. This is the NYPD in the 80s only they have fewer bell bottoms and ****tier haircuts.
Lol.....
That's your standard ? Dorian Johnson's testimony and the fact the Police decided not to inflame the situation by arresting him ?
It shouldn't be going through the courts at all.
If it makes it that far it will already have been a travesty of Justice.
Excuse me? When did thug became a criminal conviction?Oh stop playing coy, you've spent entire threads calling him a thug/criminal when he was in fact innocent in the eyes of the law.
And again.You don't get to say you didn't address his character. You've been shilling-up to the mudding done by this corrupt PD.
And again. Not the whole department, and you have no idea why the numbers were incorrect.Beating up suspects, threatening the media, heavy handed tactics against peaceful protesters, arresting people without charging them, various civil rights lawsuits, arrest numbers which don't match up, take your pick of the corrupting.
Knowing something is a travesty of Justice does not an any way suggest unhappiness.
So again. Just how do you think you are going to prove this unhappiness?
.There wont be any court decision for you to cry over
I've heard all these same comments and complaints about the law before - time and again. Hardly something 'only found in Ferguson'. I've been around for while.
You are not making any sense.Did that make sense when it was still in your brain?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?