Your bias is showing, better pull it up.
First a Prosecutor is hardly a objective resource. Her husband was part of the demonstration before anyone knew anything.
Nect, 2cnd degree murder is a non-premeditated assault that where homicide may be likely.
All the other charges are BS ( so is the second degree murder charge )
No one grabbed Freddie Gray and " threw him into the back of the van ". So where's the " assault " ?
I'm not the one making statements like " he was thrown into the back of the Van "
THAT'S bias. Bias is protesting and rioting before the facts have been released
Is it or is it not a murder charge?
That is odd, the only one you embarrassed was you and you are doing it to yourself again.
You clearly failed to see that I already provided a video of his interview with the reporter. :doh
Secondly nothing he currently says really changes much of what has already been argued. The substance is still the same. There was no "rough ride/nickle ride", he was still moving when he was put into the van and his moving stopped as they arrived at their destination.
And as previously pointed out, what currently matters his is statements as already given being in the hands of the Prosecutor who is making the decisions in this case.
Involuntary or second degree at most I think is appropriate. I don't believe this was a premeditated murder. I fear that we over-prosecute with murder charges these days.
It is called second degree MURDER.. and nothing was premeditated that was clear from the start.
At best it was a gross negligence of duty or out right racism... I am thinking more of the first and less of the latter.
It is called second degree MURDER.. and nothing was premeditated that was clear from the start.
At best it was a gross negligence of duty or out right racism... I am thinking more of the first and less of the latter.
" Racism " ? How would you know if the Cops were racist ?
Its that kind of irresponsible nonsense thats leading to riots, violence and destruction in these inner city areas.
And a Prosecutor who just happens to be married to a City Council member AND who's largest contributor is the attorney of Freddie Gray is hardly objective.
Its obvious she threw every charge she could hoping one would stick.
She' s seeking " justice " ? Yea right.
" Racism " ? How would you know if the Cops were racist ?
Its that kind of irresponsible nonsense thats leading to riots, violence and destruction in these inner city areas.
And a Prosecutor who just happens to be married to a City Council member AND who's largest contributor is the attorney of Freddie Gray is hardly objective.
Its obvious she threw every charge she could hoping one would stick.
She' s seeking " justice " ? Yea right.
We'll find out. The State must be able to prove these charges to a jury.
Comes down to motivation of the white cops against a black suspect.
No it is the actions of irresponsible corrupt police and local government that is leading to riots, violence and destruction.
And you can back up these claims of course?
LOL seriously? Breaking police rules, false arrest... those charges are some how wrong?
They three every charge they could at these Police.
No way they bring all those charges to trial. This is to stop the riots.
They will have to prove IINTENT to get them on the Second degree murder charge.
If a Police Officer didn't literally enter into the van,close the door behind him and slam the prisoner into the back of the van, then they won't be successful with their prosecution.
No, law enforcement investigating law enforcement, lol. A system used by many European countries of total independence would be preferred.
You have no clue, just the temerity to accuse others of it.
Comes down to motivation of the white cops against a black suspect.
No it is the actions of irresponsible corrupt police and local government that is leading to riots, violence and destruction.
And you can back up these claims of course?
LOL seriously? Breaking police rules, false arrest... those charges are some how wrong?
The rioting is the action of irresponsible thugs, who have no respect for others' personal property, but think the government owes them for their perceived discrimination, when it's their own fault, they didn't get too far in their life's career.
So, a guy who can't see what's happening on the other side of the van should be used as a material witness to give credence to the story that a man severed his own spine and thereby exonerate the police...and with distorted statements he has personally refuted?
You can't possibly be serious.
I see.. so racism is not a problem nor police brutality? Shooting someone in the back is just normal in the US? Stopping people because of their skin colour.. is just standard operating procedure right? Why are so many right wingers in the US in such denial?
Why are so many left wingers so friken gullible ?
I see.. so racism is not a problem nor police brutality? Shooting someone in the back is just normal in the US? Stopping people because of their skin colour.. is just standard operating procedure right? Why are so many right wingers in the US in such denial?
I don't know the answer, but school busses don't have seat belts in spite of the law.Maybe this is a dumb question...but do police vans not have seat belts?
I was under the impression that buckling up was the law?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?