- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 160,900
- Reaction score
- 57,846
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I saw him in the Trump Cult threadBullshit and where is SMTA?
I saw him in the Trump Cult threadBullshit and where is SMTA?
maybe you are an archer?Loosing...lol. I haven't done that in a while.
more nonsense: Harris is the closest thing to a real fascist of the four. and all the democrats are big gun banners, which is a main tenet of fascism. Democrats are also the anti-free speech party as wellThis is not true, and the margin in 2016 was tighter, Clinton gave her concession speech the next day.
The problem is that support for Trump comes from people who are basically authoritarian and fascist-like. They are okay with democracy so long as they always win. The continued behavior of crazies like Rudy, Powell, Wood, etc. is going to lead to a split in the Republican party. Even yesterday Newt had enough and came out against the calls for a boycott.
Fascists always pick a minority group....like muslims or immigrants....and gain power by pitting the rest of the country against themThis is not true, and the margin in 2016 was tighter, Clinton gave her concession speech the next day.
The problem is that support for Trump comes from people who are basically authoritarian and fascist-like. They are okay with democracy so long as they always win. The continued behavior of crazies like Rudy, Powell, Wood, etc. is going to lead to a split in the Republican party. Even yesterday Newt had enough and came out against the calls for a boycott.
more nonsense: Harris is the closest thing to a real fascist of the four. and all the democrats are big gun banners, which is a main tenet of fascism. Democrats are also the anti-free speech party as well
Wow, your hate for the black chick knows no bounds. Day-um.more nonsense: Harris is the closest thing to a real fascist of the four. and all the democrats are big gun banners, which is a main tenet of fascism. Democrats are also the anti-free speech party as well
did you bother to learn about her tenure as the Californian AG?Okay. Please explain why you think Harris is a "real" fascist.
Let us define the term:
![]()
Fascism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
How does this apply to Harris?
Also, given the makeup of the Supreme Court do you think there is any realistic chance of guns being banned anytime in the next decade?
Also, are you aware that Harris does not support an outright ban on gun ownership?
Your accusations against Harris are nothing more than an exaggeration.
Your dishonesty is monumental and your mendacious attempt to make this a racial issue is pure trollingWow, your hate for the black chick knows no bounds. Day-um.
You mean the part where she faithfully enforced the laws of the state?did you bother to learn about her tenure as the Californian AG?
Uh, no. I just noticed that there is no limit to the nastiness you display toward the black chick. That be a fact.Your dishonesty is monumental and your mendacious attempt to make this a racial issue is pure trolling
This is coming from someone who has been so kind towards the President and his supporters?Uh. no. I just noticed that there is no limit to the nastiness you display toward the black chick. That be a fact.
Uh, maybe my eyes deceive, but the fat white guy is not a black chick.This is coming from someone who has been so kind towards the President and his supporters?
No, just sexist and likely racist.Everything I have said about Harris is truthful.
Earlier it looked possible, back when Kelly was the only proven swindler. But now Perdue has been shown to be one too. So, the odds are less likely now of anyone splitting a ticket, unless there are still people unaware of the new information because their eyes have been glued to nothing but Fox News.I can't imagine that the Dems take both but in my view it is either both or none for either party. Can't see anyone who votes splitting their vote on this ballot.
You pretend that legitimate criticisms of someone's actions or politics must be based on bigotry because you cannot fathom that Harris's actions and politics are not supported by millions of Americans. Or you are just trolling. Neither position is honest. Why do you engage in racist attacks and fat shaming towards Trump?Uh, maybe my eyes deceive, but the fat white guy is not a black chick.
No, just sexist and likely racist.
Calling Kamala Harris "KayHo" or whatever demeaning lowbrow insult you think of next does not "legitimate criticism" make. It does, however, signal sexism, the kind most everyone can identify.You pretend that legitimate criticisms of someone's actions or politics must be based on bigotry because you cannot fathom that Harris's actions and politics are not supported by millions of Americans. Or you are just trolling. Neither position is honest. Why do you engage in racist attacks and fat shaming towards Trump?
did you bother to learn about her tenure as the Californian AG?
Well, if you have a problem with her record as Cal AG, why not write about in a post?
Why do I have to guess what you are thinking?
Why do you simply assume I must accept every conclusion you've ever made about any topic?
Do I need to repeat dozens of times?
1) she lied and tried to hide evidence that would clear a man wrongfully put on death row
2) her policies actually sent lots of black males to harsher prison terms
4) she is a gun banner
This isn't really a policy issue is it? What relevance does this have to the present discussion?
As compared to Republican Party tough-on-crime policies over the past few decades?
Why do you not describe those policies as promoted by Republicans as "fascist" in nature?
Are guns banned in California?
what policy sent the most black men to long prison terms? the Clinton crime bill that Biden was the main advocate in the senate for.
that's not the issue, the issue is what did Biden help pass and what impact did it have.It's not fun talking to you because you just spit out the same tired talking points.
If you go back and read the newspaper clippings from that era it's clear that Republicans opposed the Clinton crime bill for not being tough enough and for having too much pork in it. The Republicans tried to pass a much tougher crime bill after the Clinton crime bill passed in an attempt to grab the issue back from Democrats.
Here's a brief history lesson concerning the general GOP stance and its "tough" on crime policies as it relates to drug sentencing:
A Timeline of the Rise and Fall of 'Tough on Crime' Drug Sentencing
In an odd twist, deficit hawk Republicans are fighting with tough-on-crime Democrats to pass legislation for fairer, less aggressive prison sentencing.www.theatlantic.com
Calamity, you need to get with the program. It's Newsmax and OAN.......Fox is now part of the MSM>unaware of the new information because their eyes have been glued to nothing but Fox News.
that's not the issue, the issue is what did Biden help pass and what impact did it have.
you claim to be an independent.I don't think that's the issue.
I also don't care that Biden should be criticized for helping to pass a bill that Republicans also supported, and which was voted against by Republicans who thought the bill wasn't tough enough.
1. Can we agree on a common definition of Fascism?
2. Can we agree that Republicans have done the same things you are attacking Biden and Harris for?
This isn't some television debate. You can be honest and argue for your cause in good faith without resorting to deceit. I don't care about your dumb talking points.