• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Prediction - Democrats will win both Senate seats in the Georgia Run-off

This is not true, and the margin in 2016 was tighter, Clinton gave her concession speech the next day.

The problem is that support for Trump comes from people who are basically authoritarian and fascist-like. They are okay with democracy so long as they always win. The continued behavior of crazies like Rudy, Powell, Wood, etc. is going to lead to a split in the Republican party. Even yesterday Newt had enough and came out against the calls for a boycott.
more nonsense: Harris is the closest thing to a real fascist of the four. and all the democrats are big gun banners, which is a main tenet of fascism. Democrats are also the anti-free speech party as well
 
This is not true, and the margin in 2016 was tighter, Clinton gave her concession speech the next day.

The problem is that support for Trump comes from people who are basically authoritarian and fascist-like. They are okay with democracy so long as they always win. The continued behavior of crazies like Rudy, Powell, Wood, etc. is going to lead to a split in the Republican party. Even yesterday Newt had enough and came out against the calls for a boycott.
Fascists always pick a minority group....like muslims or immigrants....and gain power by pitting the rest of the country against them


It is what trumpism is
 
more nonsense: Harris is the closest thing to a real fascist of the four. and all the democrats are big gun banners, which is a main tenet of fascism. Democrats are also the anti-free speech party as well

Okay. Please explain why you think Harris is a "real" fascist.

Let us define the term:


How does this apply to Harris?

Also, given the makeup of the Supreme Court do you think there is any realistic chance of guns being banned anytime in the next decade?

Also, are you aware that Harris does not support an outright ban on gun ownership?

Your accusations against Harris are nothing more than an exaggeration.
 
more nonsense: Harris is the closest thing to a real fascist of the four. and all the democrats are big gun banners, which is a main tenet of fascism. Democrats are also the anti-free speech party as well
Wow, your hate for the black chick knows no bounds. Day-um.
 
Okay. Please explain why you think Harris is a "real" fascist.

Let us define the term:


How does this apply to Harris?

Also, given the makeup of the Supreme Court do you think there is any realistic chance of guns being banned anytime in the next decade?

Also, are you aware that Harris does not support an outright ban on gun ownership?

Your accusations against Harris are nothing more than an exaggeration.
did you bother to learn about her tenure as the Californian AG?
 
Wow, your hate for the black chick knows no bounds. Day-um.
Your dishonesty is monumental and your mendacious attempt to make this a racial issue is pure trolling
 
did you bother to learn about her tenure as the Californian AG?
You mean the part where she faithfully enforced the laws of the state?

...lol
 
Your dishonesty is monumental and your mendacious attempt to make this a racial issue is pure trolling
Uh, no. I just noticed that there is no limit to the nastiness you display toward the black chick. That be a fact.
 
Uh. no. I just noticed that there is no limit to the nastiness you display toward the black chick. That be a fact.
This is coming from someone who has been so kind towards the President and his supporters?

Everything I have said about Harris is truthful.
 
This is coming from someone who has been so kind towards the President and his supporters?
Uh, maybe my eyes deceive, but the fat white guy is not a black chick.

Everything I have said about Harris is truthful.
No, just sexist and likely racist.
 
I can't imagine that the Dems take both but in my view it is either both or none for either party. Can't see anyone who votes splitting their vote on this ballot.
 
I can't imagine that the Dems take both but in my view it is either both or none for either party. Can't see anyone who votes splitting their vote on this ballot.
Earlier it looked possible, back when Kelly was the only proven swindler. But now Perdue has been shown to be one too. So, the odds are less likely now of anyone splitting a ticket, unless there are still people unaware of the new information because their eyes have been glued to nothing but Fox News.
 
Uh, maybe my eyes deceive, but the fat white guy is not a black chick.


No, just sexist and likely racist.
You pretend that legitimate criticisms of someone's actions or politics must be based on bigotry because you cannot fathom that Harris's actions and politics are not supported by millions of Americans. Or you are just trolling. Neither position is honest. Why do you engage in racist attacks and fat shaming towards Trump?
 
You pretend that legitimate criticisms of someone's actions or politics must be based on bigotry because you cannot fathom that Harris's actions and politics are not supported by millions of Americans. Or you are just trolling. Neither position is honest. Why do you engage in racist attacks and fat shaming towards Trump?
Calling Kamala Harris "KayHo" or whatever demeaning lowbrow insult you think of next does not "legitimate criticism" make. It does, however, signal sexism, the kind most everyone can identify.
 
did you bother to learn about her tenure as the Californian AG?

Well, if you have a problem with her record as Cal AG, why not write about in a post?

Why do I have to guess what you are thinking?

Why do you simply assume I must accept every conclusion you've ever made about any topic?
 
Well, if you have a problem with her record as Cal AG, why not write about in a post?

Why do I have to guess what you are thinking?

Why do you simply assume I must accept every conclusion you've ever made about any topic?

Do I need to repeat dozens of times?

1) she lied and tried to hide evidence that would clear a man wrongfully put on death row
2) her policies actually sent lots of black males to harsher prison terms
4) she is a gun banner
 
Do I need to repeat dozens of times?

1) she lied and tried to hide evidence that would clear a man wrongfully put on death row

This isn't really a policy issue is it? What relevance does this have to the present discussion?

2) her policies actually sent lots of black males to harsher prison terms

As compared to Republican Party tough-on-crime policies over the past few decades?

Why do you not describe those policies as promoted by Republicans as "fascist" in nature?

4) she is a gun banner

Are guns banned in California?

And she has never advocated or endorsed or put forward or enacted any outright bans on guns. So why do you call her a gun banner?

None of this stuff that you're describing can accurately be described as "fascism."

It's all run-of-the-mill stuff. With respect to the tough on crime policies, it's also stuff that the Republican Party has enthusiastically endorsed.
 
This isn't really a policy issue is it? What relevance does this have to the present discussion?



As compared to Republican Party tough-on-crime policies over the past few decades?

Why do you not describe those policies as promoted by Republicans as "fascist" in nature?



Are guns banned in California?

what policy sent the most black men to long prison terms? the Clinton crime bill that Biden was the main advocate in the senate for.
 
what policy sent the most black men to long prison terms? the Clinton crime bill that Biden was the main advocate in the senate for.

It's not fun talking to you because you just spit out the same tired talking points. There is virtually no substance to any of the posts you write.

If you go back and read the newspaper clippings from that era it's clear that Republicans opposed the Clinton crime bill for not being tough enough and for having too much pork in it. The Republicans tried to pass a much tougher crime bill after the Clinton crime bill passed in an attempt to grab the issue back from Democrats.

Here's a brief history lesson concerning the general GOP stance and its "tough" on crime policies as it relates to drug sentencing:

 
It's not fun talking to you because you just spit out the same tired talking points.

If you go back and read the newspaper clippings from that era it's clear that Republicans opposed the Clinton crime bill for not being tough enough and for having too much pork in it. The Republicans tried to pass a much tougher crime bill after the Clinton crime bill passed in an attempt to grab the issue back from Democrats.

Here's a brief history lesson concerning the general GOP stance and its "tough" on crime policies as it relates to drug sentencing:

that's not the issue, the issue is what did Biden help pass and what impact did it have.
 
unaware of the new information because their eyes have been glued to nothing but Fox News.
Calamity, you need to get with the program. It's Newsmax and OAN.......Fox is now part of the MSM> 😉
 
that's not the issue, the issue is what did Biden help pass and what impact did it have.

I don't think that's the issue.

I also don't care that Biden should be criticized for helping to pass a bill that Republicans also supported, and which was voted against by Republicans who thought the bill wasn't tough enough.

1. Can we agree on a common definition of Fascism?

2. Can we agree that Republicans have done the same things you are attacking Biden and Harris for?

This isn't some television debate. You can be honest and argue for your cause in good faith without resorting to deceit. I don't care about your dumb talking points.
 
I don't think that's the issue.

I also don't care that Biden should be criticized for helping to pass a bill that Republicans also supported, and which was voted against by Republicans who thought the bill wasn't tough enough.

1. Can we agree on a common definition of Fascism?

2. Can we agree that Republicans have done the same things you are attacking Biden and Harris for?

This isn't some television debate. You can be honest and argue for your cause in good faith without resorting to deceit. I don't care about your dumb talking points.
you claim to be an independent.

do you support the Biden campaign planks that include

massive tax hikes on both individuals and corporations
Banning lots of guns from being sold while forcing gun owners to pay 200 dollars for each gun they own and 200 dollars for each normal capacity magazine they own?
 
Back
Top Bottom