- Joined
- Nov 1, 2022
- Messages
- 26,476
- Reaction score
- 7,769
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
so Noem killing the dog because she didn't want it anymore was ok ? you're ok with it, no issues at all with it ?Could you possibly change the subject any further? Perhaps your last refuge, because it's a sure sign of losing an argument.
Mankind has been domesticating dogs for 15,000 years, and deliberately breeding them for at least 9,500 years. Virtually every distinguishable dog breed was created in exactly the same way. For thousands of years, whenever a dog owner wanted to breed any confirmation or temperament into, or out of, their domesticated dogs, they simply killed the ones in the litter that exhibited any unwanted traits. Even as recently as a hundred years ago, nobody was performing spaying and neutering operations on their non conforming dogs to control their breeding. People couldn't afford to feed unproductive animals. Dogs that wouldn't fulfill their intended use have been slaughtered for millennia, no different than any domesticated animal was.
It's called breeding.
You're not fit to judge what is responsible sex for somebody else. Only yourself. Period.
And a man should have no autonomy over a woman. None. Alas, even to this day, most of the misogynist planet does not subscribe to that. Throughout most of history, women have been considered the property of men. Fortunately now, at least in Western civilization, they've become recognized as co-equal first class citizens, with equal rights to men, including bodily autonomy.
It's a waste of time to argue false equivalencies with me. Why do you do it? To make a fool of yourself? A man's bodily autonomy is never at stake, nor will it ever be. The days of creating eunuchs are past.
then be fair and don't have autonomy over men
why isn't it the same ? woman wants to keep a baby the man doesn't, it has nothing to do with the man, his money, his choice .... right ?