When were you going to post all that evidence again?
Or answer this with something rational, rather than, there were a bunch of them in the GOP
against him That makes no sense. See:
Why, in the 2.5 months before the inauguration, the GOP, in power, with all their majority votes and resources, didnt they form a commission or major official investigation to investigate the heck out of every state's elections and voting? To investigate all the challenges and claims in a coordinated official manner, using the DOJ or other judicial authority? (They could have done it after Jan 20, even now....)
Why wouldnt the GOP have moved heaven and earth, done everything legally possible, to retain power and to maintain their hold on the Whitehouse? As if they'd prefer the Democrats for 4 yrs and have to start all over again in 2024 and lose a lot of their own personal power and conservative initiatives? Risk all that?
Do you have a new, more reasonable answer yet? Besides, 'they didnt want The Donald to remain?' As if they'd rather have a Dem?
Oh, and it seems that they...
the GOP...did their due diligence in investigating and...found nada:
"We looked -- as a part of our due diligence, we looked at over 60 different accusations made in multiple states."
"The election was fair, as fair as we have seen. We simply did not win the election, as Republicans, for the presidency. And moving forward -- and that's the way we want to look at this -- moving forward, we have to refocus once again on what it's going to take to win the presidency.
On Sunday, South Dakota Republican Sen. Mike Rounds was asked a blunt question by ABC's George Stephanopoulos: "What do you say to all those Republicans, all those veterans who believe the election was stolen, who have bought the falsehoods coming from former President Trump?"
www.cnn.com