ocean515
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Messages
- 36,760
- Reaction score
- 15,468
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
61 percent rate...
And with California looking to confiscate over 13%, it's no wonder Phil has put his Southern California home up for sale.
Phil Mickelson Faces 61 Percent Tax Rate Following Back-To-Back Wins « CBS Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — Thanks to his recent wins at both The Open Championship and the Scottish Open, Phil Mickelson pocketed more than $2.16 million in just two weeks.
The world’s top golfer —who came under fire earlier this year when he complained about his supposed 60 percent tax rate as a California resident — is taking another hit on his recent earnings.
Is he justified to complain about his tax bill, or is he just another greedy 1%'er?
61 percent rate...
And with California looking to confiscate over 13%, it's no wonder Phil has put his Southern California home up for sale.
Phil Mickelson Faces 61 Percent Tax Rate Following Back-To-Back Wins « CBS Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — Thanks to his recent wins at both The Open Championship and the Scottish Open, Phil Mickelson pocketed more than $2.16 million in just two weeks.
The world’s top golfer —who came under fire earlier this year when he complained about his supposed 60 percent tax rate as a California resident — is taking another hit on his recent earnings.
Is he justified to complain about his tax bill, or is he just another greedy 1%'er?
Forbes estimates he will take home $842,700, which, of course, does not include any of his tax-deductible travel expenses and the additional 10 percent he owes to his caddy. So why not extrapolate the deductible expenses. Drama?
This is all at the top rate so he made other money that wasn't at that rate.
Now, is that a lot of tax? Yes. Do I feel sorry for him? Not really. Does he have the right to bitch about this? Yes, of course.
BTW CA top rate is 10.13% not 13%.
.
You need to update your data on California income tax rates.
California Voters Sock It To The Rich (And The Fate Of Other State Tax Ballot Measures) - Forbes
Proposition 30 creates three new upper income tax brackets for the next seven years. For example, folks with $250,000 to $300,000 a year in income will pay 10.3%, up from 9.3%. The new top income tax rate–for folks with income of $1 million-plus–will be 13.3%, up from a current top rate of 10.3%.
Prop 30 established that on the whole, voters refused to pay for their childrens education and other services, and demanded the rich pay for it for them.
So, yes, 13.3%. I actually rounded down.
I guess should Phil actually move out of California, as so many are, those voters will have to search for others to pay for the things they refuse to take responsibility for themselves. I suppose that makes sense given the ubber liberal/progressive nature of the state.
Thanks for the update. He could live in NV (I'll rent him a place for $750) and pay 0% state tax. So, it sounds like a personal choice. Must be rough making only a million or two a year.
Ah. Well, envy could cause one to think that way. However, it certainly puts binders on big investment plans. But then again, who needs more business development?
Ah. Well, envy could cause one to think that way. However, it certainly puts binders on big investment plans. But then again, who needs more business development?
What are Lefty's business ventures?
I'm sorry, the whole "pro athletes are overtaxed" argument isn't really going over for me.
Envy? Of what? His income? Can't be that since you don't know what MY income is. Envy of location? CA is definitely nicer that NV but too pretentious for me. I live very quietly and we always have parking spaces.
All I said was that NV income tax is 0%. Do you envy me? You can drive here in 5 hours. No need for envy. Tell you what, for you, just $650.
There are many. This is just one. The Foundation
As to what isn't going over on you, I'd suspect your "overtaxed" sentiment wouldn't be restricted to just pro athletes.
No it extends to entertainers who make zillions as well.
I'm not into "tax the rich into extinction," but I also don't have much sympathy for people who live beyond what most people would call "comfortable." If they don't pay higher taxes, then the rest of us do. Would you rather they take more of Phil's check or more of yours?
Um, he gets to deduct his states taxes from his federal amount.61 percent rate...
And with California looking to confiscate over 13%, it's no wonder Phil has put his Southern California home up for sale.
Phil Mickelson Faces 61 Percent Tax Rate Following Back-To-Back Wins « CBS Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — Thanks to his recent wins at both The Open Championship and the Scottish Open, Phil Mickelson pocketed more than $2.16 million in just two weeks.
The world’s top golfer —who came under fire earlier this year when he complained about his supposed 60 percent tax rate as a California resident — is taking another hit on his recent earnings.
Is he justified to complain about his tax bill, or is he just another greedy 1%'er?
61 percent rate...And with California looking to confiscate over 13%, it's no wonder Phil has put his Southern California home up for sale.Phil Mickelson Faces 61 Percent Tax Rate Following Back-To-Back Wins « CBS Los AngelesLOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — Thanks to his recent wins at both The Open Championship and the Scottish Open, Phil Mickelson pocketed more than $2.16 million in just two weeks. The world’s top golfer —who came under fire earlier this year when he complained about his supposed 60 percent tax rate as a California resident — is taking another hit on his recent earnings.Is he justified to complain about his tax bill, or is he just another greedy 1%'er?
...and since most of the top earners pay @ 25% effective rates, you can't feel very sorry for poor Phil.Difficult to believe Phil is worried how to dodge the tax man with this 2.1 mil when he receives on average 60 million a year in play and endorsement pay- 50 mil on the endorsement side.
I do hope everyone realizes Phil claims a 60% tax rate but has yet to produce ANY proof of that. There are many foundation schemes out there that provide IMMEDIATE tax relief and he does have a foundation. By law it is required to disburse a whooping 5% of it's entitlement per year... a cool dodge on the tax rate he claims it would be hit with. he can set up a tax dodge where the charity uses the interest off the donation for a certain period of time and then the money can revert back to the family or be renegotiated and continue. (Many signing bonuses go this route) if the 50 mil from endorsements gets thin he can always put himself, wife and any other relatives to include minor children on the board, get paid for sitting there and as long as 60% of the operating budget is for charity- you are golden. (The IRS barely looks at a tiny fraction of 1% of the privately funded foundations so little worry there.)
All in all I find it difficult to believe he pays 60% of his gross income in taxes, he doesn't have a bevy of accountants making damn sure he doesn't.
Course any lottery winner can tell you, huge winnings get quite the tax bite.
Um, he gets to deduct his states taxes from his federal amount.
His real rate will be closer to 53%
The truth behind the taxes of Phil Mickelson - Jan. 23, 2013
Cry me a river....
Difficult to believe Phil is worried how to dodge the tax man with this 2.1 mil when he receives on average 60 million a year in play and endorsement pay- 50 mil on the endorsement side.
I do hope everyone realizes Phil claims a 60% tax rate but has yet to produce ANY proof of that. There are many foundation schemes out there that provide IMMEDIATE tax relief and he does have a foundation. By law it is required to disburse a whooping 5% of it's entitlement per year... a cool dodge on the tax rate he claims it would be hit with. he can set up a tax dodge where the charity uses the interest off the donation for a certain period of time and then the money can revert back to the family or be renegotiated and continue. (Many signing bonuses go this route) if the 50 mil from endorsements gets thin he can always put himself, wife and any other relatives to include minor children on the board, get paid for sitting there and as long as 60% of the operating budget is for charity- you are golden. (The IRS barely looks at a tiny fraction of 1% of the privately funded foundations so little worry there.)
All in all I find it difficult to believe he pays 60% of his gross income in taxes, he doesn't have a bevy of accountants making damn sure he doesn't.
Course any lottery winner can tell you, huge winnings get quite the tax bite.
I can't imagine that some are blessed with being able to whack little white balls with some given skill....which sponsors shower with riches to promote a sport that earns all concerned untold wealth from less talented hacks and spectators?I understand. Imagining one could achieve such personal success is clearly impossible for some. Envy is a much better emotion to obsess over.
Until you have to fork over 53% yourself I don't think you're in any position to suggest that rate is appropriate for others.Um, he gets to deduct his states taxes from his federal amount.
His real rate will be closer to 53%
The truth behind the taxes of Phil Mickelson - Jan. 23, 2013
Cry me a river....
I don't have to win a lottery to comment on what % the govt should collect.Until you have to fork over 53% yourself I don't think you're in any position to suggest that rate is appropriate for others.
No, I think 61% is more than enough Phil, and I am absolutely sure my tax burden is far more than enough.
What I'd like to see is "them" taking more of others. In fact for a massive number of people, since we're referencing income taxes, I'd be happy to see "them" start with some income taxes paid at all.
"Not enough" is a great motivator. Shame we've bowed to those who demand we take responsibility for answering that call.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?