People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood[W:499]

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

:lamo It is tough for you. I am having no problems at all.

Sure, seeing how the delusional never realize their condition, that figures.

Nevertheless, the state of your thread remains a failure on account of the lack of credibility you've been documented as suffering from.

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Sure, seeing how the delusional never realize their condition, that figures.

Nevertheless, the state of your thread remains a failure on account of the lack of credibility you've been documented as suffering from.

Got those examples of Spencer and Geller being insane yet?

 

[CLAX1911]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

It's hypocritical to criticize even jihadis when you promote the exact same actions as they do. You and them are both about the same level of threat to America.

That's complete b******* and you know it. How many buildings have cold joints flown jumbo Jets into? How many girls have they mutilated?

Islam is a pox on Humanity and there will be no peace as long as it exists it is set against peace.

I don't understand why people wish to ignore that what are you getting out of it? What is the end goal?

 

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Got those examples of Spencer and Geller being insane yet?

The goalposts remain firmly stuck on your false claim of "silencing".

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

The goalposts remain firmly stuck on your false claim of "silencing".

Then do not libel people and run away. Are the two dead secular bloggers silenced or not? Goal.

 

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Then do not libel people and run away. Are the two dead secular bloggers silenced or not? Goal.

The goalposts remain firmly stuck on your false claim of "silencing".

In the context of which you presented the claim. Namely in that it's done in the Western world, done on here and done to you.

You missed.

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

The goalposts remain firmly stuck on your false claim of "silencing".

In the context of which you presented the claim. Namely in that it's done in the Western world, done on here and done to you.

You missed.

Geller and Spencer? Just retract your statement then.

 

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Geller and Spencer? Just retract your statement then.

Goalposts remain, your attempts at moving them also remain.

In the latter instance laughably puny.

 

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

You apparently missed the fact that Pakistan is a democracy.

A republic.

Up until 2013 there hadn't been a single case in its history where power passed from one ruling body to another by democratic process.

Whether the current set-up will go beyond its tenure of 5 years remains to be seen.

Anyway the argument you responded to referred to oppressive legislation. With dictatorships serving merely as an example.

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Goalposts remain, your attempts at moving them also remain.

In the latter instance laughably puny.

What is laughable is your claim you refuse to back up. Spencer is an expert on Islamic literature. Geller sees the suffering Islam inflicts on Muslims and non-Muslims and is doing something about it.

 

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

What is laughable is your claim you refuse to back up. Spencer is an expert on Islamic literature. Geller sees the suffering Islam inflicts on Muslims and non-Muslims and is doing something about it.

You flagging?

Heck, can't even call it a gish trot by now.

Goalposts are still stuck, basically due to the only sensible approach one can have regarding gish gallops. Not join in.

Silencing!!!!

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

You flagging?

Heck, can't even call it a gish trot by now.

Goalposts are still stuck, basically due to the only sensible approach one can have regarding gish gallops. Not join in.

Silencing!!!!

Spencer and Geller?

 

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Spencer and Geller?

Let me know when you're prepared to address the dishonesty of your claims over silencing.

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Let me know when you're prepared to address the dishonesty of your claims over silencing.

Haven't you addressed it enough? Besides, anything I say you seem to have problem with.
Spencer and Geller?

 

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Haven't you addressed it enough? Besides, anything I say you seem to have problem with.
Spencer and Geller?

It's pretty evident who appears to have the problems here with what you say. Of the two of us it ain't me.

Goalposts are firmly stuck, remember?

 

[Tigerace117]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

That's complete b******* and you know it. How many buildings have cold joints flown jumbo Jets into? How many girls have they mutilated?

Islam is a pox on Humanity and there will be no peace as long as it exists it is set against peace.

I don't understand why people wish to ignore that what are you getting out of it? What is the end goal?

So you think that advocating Christians flying planes into buildings or mutiliating girls is somehow okay because jihadis do it? The only one spouting bull**** is people like you, who are so dead set on murdering our culture that you would turn us into the same thing you profess to hate.

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

It's pretty evident who appears to have the problems here with what you say. Of the two of us it ain't me.

Goalposts are firmly stuck, remember?

You are stuck on troll.

 

[Chagos]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

You are stuck on troll.

If by that you mean YOU, I wouldn't say that I'm exactly stuck.

But I'll admit that this here is beginning to bore me for today. Possibly I'll muster up sufficient amusement again tomorrow.

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

If by that you mean YOU, I wouldn't say that I'm exactly stuck.

But I'll admit that this here is beginning to bore me for today. Possibly I'll muster up sufficient amusement again tomorrow.

Don't panic, Islam won't change by tomorrow, more will die by tomorrow. There is ample time for you to defend the indefensible.

 

[stevecanuck]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

So you think that advocating Christians flying planes into buildings or mutiliating girls is somehow okay because jihadis do it?

You can't be possibly be so dense as to think that he was advocating that. But you can, apparently, be so disingenuous as to suggest it.

 

[Tigerace117]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

You can't be possibly be so dense as to think that he was advocating that. But you can, apparently, be so disingenuous as to suggest it.

Hate to break it to you, but considering that he already was on record as supporting an attempting terrorist bombing of innocent Americans, there's no act I'd consider being too low for him to support.

But let me guess. You don't think there's any such thing as an "innocent Muslim". :roll:

 

[stevecanuck]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

Hate to break it to you, but considering that he already was on record as supporting an attempting terrorist bombing of innocent Americans, there's no act I'd consider being too low for him to support.

But let me guess. You don't think there's any such thing as an "innocent Muslim". :roll:

Nice strawman. Please don't let the fact that I've repeatedly said the militants are a minority derail another running of the Disingenuous Express. All aboard.

 

[coldjoint]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

You can't be possibly be so dense as to think that he was advocating that. But you can, apparently, be so disingenuous as to suggest it.

A perfect example of how lies start, and how they are constantly repeated. It has been pure rhetoric from Islams apologists, nothing else.

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

You apparently missed the fact that Pakistan is a democracy. You also missed the fact that massive demonstrations were held by Muslims in Indonesia in favor of jailing a Christian politician. Your VAST majority is MIA.

And yet, we don't see the VAST majority of Muslims in Pakistan doing anything that would count them as terrorists, AND we know that any kind of representative government in Pakistan is new and tenuous. Oh, and I was discussing general dictatorships, of which most of the Muslim countries of which we speak are. And what percentage of the population of Indonesia protested?

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Re: People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

What does any of that have to do with the facts that have been presented? The only thing I see it doing is stopping discussion on the topic, You have a reason for that?

You claimed that you haven't lied. I just pointed out how you did... and how you have refused to demonstrate any integrity on backing your claim when you have been challenged to. Dishonest and cowardly are your two most important debate tactics.

And I have not flat out lied about anything concerning Islam. Because some posters insist on telling me what I said is their problem. Stop playing games and try the topic.

Of course you have lied. You've lied about being silenced... so what did you do? Change the goalposts. You've lied about numbers, you've lied about how Muslims practice Islam. You've refused to respond to being challenged on your position, repeatedly. Your OP is concerned about people who voice concerns about Islam being silenced, but as I've gone over with you, both points of your OP are poorly constructed. You don't know the difference between legitimate and dishonest/ignorant criticism of Islam and how the handling of each is different, and you don't know the difference between silencing and challenging. Here's a clue: you post dishonest/ignorant criticism of Islam which is constantly challenged. Every time it is, it is ON TOPIC for this OP.