- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
- Messages
- 23,678
- Reaction score
- 30,424
- Location
- Near Boise, ID
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
I don't think you'll find either me or the OP as supporting egregious R-wing disinformation and pearl clutching. I watch Fox News for the unintentional comedy.
Nah, if you check out his posting history, Dans has definitely thrown daggers at Republicans and the right. Not sure about Antiwar and Oneworld2, though the latter is definitely a pro-Putin shillposter.Watch who they call out. Exclusively democrats.
They're basically republican trolls.
Antiwar, Oneworld2, this person. They all have the same schtick.
I watched FN for years starting with its debut, but yeah, they went down the comedic slope.
I don't have TV that is connected to cable or satellite and I don't even have an antenna for local channels so the only way I can access is via the series of tubes.
I frequent the FN web site as a matter of course in posting here but that is even a laugh so often.
Ayup!Nah, if you check out his posting history, Dans has definitely thrown daggers at Republicans and the right.
Fox News went from mostly inoffensive albeit tilted reporting in the style of say Chris Wallace to full blown classic propaganda self-satire. It's impossible to take seriously now.
How very silly. I think , during the Trump years, her biggest qualifier was the way she grabbed him by the balls and squeezedAnyone who's been paying attention knows that her biggest (if not only) qualifier by far for her position and prominence is her utility as a fundraiser in solicitating the donations (and demands) of the rich, and otherwise monetizing access and influence. This is the primary reason corporate owned media, and particularly the elements of Democratic party reliant on big donors (i.e. most of it), are not keen to call out her deficiencies and how her behaviour is routinely inconsistent with the party's values.
I wish.How very silly. I think , during the Trump years, her biggest qualifier was the way she grabbed him by the balls and squeezed
You know why? Because democrats keep up the façade that they actually care about the people. At least Republicans are honest. And yet people like you fall in line every election like the good robots you are.Watch who they call out. Exclusively democrats.
They're basically republican trolls.
Antiwar, Oneworld2, this person. They all have the same schtick.
Shouldn't you be showing your support for Putin right about now?You know why? Because democrats keep up the façade that they actually care about the people. At least Republicans are honest. And yet people like you fall in line every election like the good robots you are.
I cant be on the grind all the time.Shouldn't you be showing your support for Putin right about now?
Do you have ANY examples of where he actually supported Putin?Shouldn't you be showing your support for Putin right about now?
Other than a rock would be a "legitimate challenger", yeah.I only need to see the OP cover-frame and I know the handlebar mustache is neither a "legitimate challenger" nor someone about to out-maneuver a political pro. The guy is ridiculous literally on his face. I saw "legitimate challenger", I saw the mustache, I laughed. Everyone laughed. Good one.
Well, apparently the leftist echo chamber PBS, for one.I think you are correct about the corporate media. I mean, how many networks are going to air this gem from Nancy?
The man-bun did it for me. Every time I go to town I say I'm gonna sharpen my pocket knife and start my man-bun collection. I'll keep then on tissue paper in a shoe box.I only need to see the OP cover-frame and I know the handlebar mustache is neither a "legitimate challenger" nor someone about to out-maneuver a political pro. The guy is ridiculous literally on his face. I saw "legitimate challenger", I saw the mustache, I laughed. Everyone laughed. Good one.
Is PBS "corporate media" nowadays?Well, apparently the leftist echo chamber PBS, for one.
You know why? Because democrats keep up the façade that they actually care about the people. At least Republicans are honest. And yet people like you fall in line every election like the good robots you are.
Do you have ANY examples of where he actually supported Putin?
Otherwise, you only have a hyper-partisan post .
And you know different?Sure. Referring to Putin's invasion of the Ukraine as "genius".
And you know different?
It was a good plan, but poorly executed. You don't care about that as long as you "think" you can score points on Trump. Biden is senile, but the jury is still out (STILL) on Trump.Yes. The Russians are getting their arses reamed out, with no benefit whatsoever.
It was ****ing stupid, but there's Trump's senile ass cheering it on.
It was a good plan, but poorly executed. You don't care about that as long as you "think" you can score points on Trump. Biden is senile, but the jury is still out (STILL) on Trump.
What the hell do you know about "Combined Arms Warfare"? Have you even watched a coordinated combat assault?No, it was a stupid plan. It absolutely ignored any effort at combined arms warfare, the troops weren't rehearsed, and their logistics were never even planned.
It was arrogant and dumb as hell. So of course Trump thought it was genius. It's a stupid person's idea of what genius looks like.
Yes. I did a few years in the infantry. You?What the hell do you know about "Combined Arms Warfare"? Have you even watched a coordinated combat assault?
No, it was dumb from the very beginning.So of course, you thought is was a bad idea, without any factual back up. In fact, you just imagined how it happened. Hindsight is always 20/20.
You didn't think we were going to let you forget, did you?I will concede that the outcome was abysmal for the Russians, and I can't think of a better group to get whipped.
You pay a lot of attention to Trump. Much more than the rest of us.
When representatives or senators have been in office for awhile, I just assume there's a huge interwoven web of connections and favors hidden behind the scenes that protects them from challengers.The corporate media doesn't acknowledge any of Pelosi's legitimate challengers, allowing her to avoid debating her role and leadership of the Democratic Party for decades. If she debated any challenger she'd get whipped badly, as she has been an abject failure except as a corporate tool. Pelosi really is a disgusting person.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?