- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Twenty-five years after accusing an innocent man of rape, Tawana Brawley is finally paying for her lies.
Last week, 10 checks totaling $3,764.61 were delivered to ex-prosecutor Steven Pagones — the first payments Brawley has made since a court determined in 1998 that she defamed him with her vicious hoax.
’87 rape hoaxer Tawana Brawley begins paying defamation damages 25 years later - NYPOST.com
Why isn't this lieing bitch in jail? She has to be in contempt of court, by now!
Wow, 25 years and you are still worried about this? he must have been a good friend of yours to care this much. I would hate to think you have been fuming all these years over this for other reasons. BTW it is often hard to collect on civil suits when a person is unwilling or unable to pay. Oh, and the NY post? Seriously the NY post? Please next time use something more reliable like the national enquirer, the star, or perhaps the five year old liar kid down the street. I would really make sure this actually happened now that I see the source. This could just be a feel good article pulled out of thin air to make the cons think they actually got something.
Wow, 25 years and you are still worried about this?
Amazing! You're sticking up for a woman that LIED out being raped.
You know people were killed, because of her. Right? Oh, wait! She's black.
Nevermind, my bad. I know why you're sticking up for her lieing ass.
The truth isn't measured in years
Amazing! You're sticking up for a woman that LIED out being raped. You know people were killed, because of her. Right? Oh, wait! She's black. Nevermind, my bad. I know why you're sticking up for her lieing ass.
Brawley is only still news because her mentor, Al the liar and agitator Sharpton is still running around free stirring up trouble.
Which is the only reason apdst even cares. If it weren't for Al Sharpton, he wouldn't.
If it weren't for the liar Sharpton no one would have cared about the bogus case in the first place.
Which is the only reason apdst even cares. If it weren't for Al Sharpton, he wouldn't.
You mean Sharpton, who's now stirring up the racial tension on Trayvon Martin?
Oh, this story has current implications. Absolutely.
Her wages are being garnished, so she is going to be paying some of it at least.Since you are obviouisly ignorant of the truth let me tell you, lots of people do not pay off civil suits
No, I think what's stupid is that it took 25 years for the innocent victim to start getting the justified reparations for her filthy lies and slander. Another thing that's stupid is expecting a false rape accusation to mean virtually nothing just because it happened 25 years ago. What if this happened to YOU?Spending 25 years worrying about tiajuana brawly is pretty damned stupid.
No, I think what's stupid is that it took 25 years for the innocent victim to start getting the justified reparations for her filthy lies and slander. Another thing that's stupid is expecting a false rape accusation to mean virtually nothing just because it happened 25 years ago. What if this happened to YOU?
Why would I only be interested because Sharpton is involved? I'm interested in this story because falsely accusing someone of a serious crime is one of the slimiest things a person could do to another, and I'm glad that this lying, filthy skank is finally being made to pay for it. If the judge, prosecution, and police involved in the horribly unjustified West Memphis Three conviction were made to pay reparations to the innocently accused, I'd be happily posting about that as well. Sharpton or not.Ok, so do you and apdst care about ALL those other cases where a false accuser ruined the life of someone? Or are you only interested because al Sharpton is involved. That is what people are getting at. This faux outrage over this is sickening.
I'm not "the right." I'm just a big fan of justice for the falsely accused.But let's also admit the truth and the only reason the right cares about THIS case is it involves Al.
If there were other articles, I'd be calling for the false witness's head there as well. Sharpton or not. But this article is about Tawanda Brawley.I don't see any mention of any other articles about other false accusers of rape.
Ok, so do you and apdst care about ALL those other cases where a false accuser ruined the life of someone? Or are you only interested because al Sharpton is involved. That is what people are getting at. This faux outrage over this is sickening.
Yes, this woman is a POS and I'm happy for aynthing being garnished from her to go to the victim. But let's also admit the truth and the only reason the right cares about THIS case is it involves Al. I don't see any mention of any other articles about other false accusers of rape.
Because we know that it is only black women who make stuff up, right?
Which is the only reason apdst even cares. If it weren't for Al Sharpton, he wouldn't.
Ok, so do you and apdst care about ALL those other cases where a false accuser ruined the life of someone? Or are you only interested because al Sharpton is involved. That is what people are getting at. This faux outrage over this is sickening.
Yes, this woman is a POS and I'm happy for aynthing being garnished from her to go to the victim. But let's also admit the truth and the only reason the right cares about THIS case is it involves Al. I don't see any mention of any other articles about other false accusers of rape.
Thanks for proving my point. And YOU call people hacks? Lol!
YOU are the one who brought up race. All I did was throw your own bilge right back in your face. Deal with it. :mrgreen:
When did I say this happen bevause Brawley is black?
apdst said:Amazing! You're sticking up for a woman that LIED out being raped. You know people were killed, because of her. Right? Oh, wait! She's black. Nevermind, my bad. I know why you're sticking up for her lieing ass.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?