• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

???Patriotism???

ProudAmerican said:
one flaw in that quote.

we were just being "told" we were being attacked. it actually happened.

(here is where you claim Iraq and Al Queda had no connection whatsoever......which is strictly an opinion like I talked about in the last post I made above)

It isn't opinion if you're looking at it scientifically. YOU are the one claiming the connection between the two, therefore the burden of proof is on you.

Still don't think so? Then claiming the Bush family didn't consipire to kill JFK is merely your opinion. Some things are opinion, and some things are fact. Iraq and Al Queda is not an opinion.

Presenting any solid evidence that there was a connection between the Iraq and Al Queda can only help you, so if you have some, please present it. If not, then Billo's Nuremberg quote is perfectly apt. APT I SAY!

Al Queda blind-sided our country, so we started flailing about erratically.
 
Originally Posted by ProudAmerican
we were just being "told" we were being attacked. it actually happened.
But not by Iraq!
 
galenrox said:
I've been operating off of George W. Bush's estimate, which is about 30k. Although it's true, Saddam could've hypothetically gone even more crazy, and despite the increased pressure on him from the international community gone on a killing spree killing 30,000 of his own citizens completely randomly, it's not a reasonable thing to expect if you have the ability to use logic.

There are terrorist bombings at funerals for people who were killed in terrorist bombings. Random people are being kidnapped or blown up regularly in the streets. There's little to no electricity, schools, or economic foundation. Poverty has gotten far worse since our entry. People have to live their lives operating under the understanding that, regardless of what they've done or their stances on anything, they may be killed in a random attack. etc.

Things were bad under Saddam, they're very clearly worse now.

And so there is a lot of work to do. No matter the sacrifice, the staus quo and the opportunity to improve it is still better than before he was removed.
 
Loxd4 said:
In Your Own Word Define “Patriotism”

Definition
Patriotism- pride in or devotion to the country somebody was born in or is a citizen of
Brainwash- to impose a set of usually political or religious beliefs on somebody by the use of various coercive methods of indoctrination, including destruction of the victim’s prior beliefs

Are these word more related then we think? There both devotion to believing something right or wrong? Is patriotism just another from of “Reverse Sociology” A.K.A “Brainwashing.” So if your really think out side the box (Not Saying They Fight A Just Cause Mean The Terrorist) those terrorist of there killing there self over in Iraq are not Brainwash just more patriotic then American because there willing to sacrifice there self just to kill one of us. So are terrorist just being patriotic (In The Wrong Way, Accordion to USA) or just being brainwashed?

Patriot evolved from the latin for father. Patriotism is thus "love for the land of the father." I see Patriotism as a Good thing, because one would want their fathers to be proud of what we do to their land. Few ancestors would want their decendants to rape, pillage, and destroy that which (most) fathers spent so much blood, swaet and time improving.

Now, Nationalism is what is sweeping the United States, not Patriotism. Nationalism promotes the supremacy of the nation and state, and especially state leaders, regardless of the good or ill the actions take. (This refers mainly to modern nationalism, in which nation and state are virtually synonymous. In the past, that wasn't the case, there were numerous stateless nations.)

Patriotism can exist in the absence of any official or formal state, nationalism does not (with a few rare exceptions).

All too often people, especially as I have seen in American Politics, equate Patriotism with Nationalism. They have different meanings, which is why there are two words.

The Founders of the United States are often refered to as the "Founding Fathers." In context of the United States, the actual fathers of our population, and the founding fathers are the people by which we should judge a behavior patriotic. Does a behavior respect and foster their ideals, desires, and goals for the country?

Does a unitary executive that holds the US Constitution as a "[Blasphemy] piece of paper" espouse the thoughts of Jefferson, Franklin, Washington, Geroge Mason, Hamilton, or even Jackson, to name a few?

The Federalist Papers were writen as a persuasion for expanding the role of the federal government and establishing an executive branch. The Consititution was a compromise essentially born out of the debate between the Article of Confederation and supporters on one side, and the federalists on another. However, people NOW look at the Federalist papers as a reason to REVERT to a less controlling state. Do the current debates on the scope of the Federal Government reflect the ideals of the founders, or even your father? Ponder that: arguements that were once used, during the founding of the country, to expand state power, are now being looked at as arguements, currently, to limit state power. And they are the VERY SAME WORDS!

Is it patriotic to the founders, men who wrote things like "Free Trade with all, Entagling alliances with none," "Give me Liberty or give me Death," and held ideals like "Power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely," and that Men have inalienable rights that just states do not infringe upon (but unjust states routinely infringe them).

These are just some of the Patriotic ideals of the United States.

Ideals that sell out public interests to the highest bidder, sacrifice liberty for the illusion of safety, instill absolute power in a unitary executive, and use the power of the state for personal gain, that the state has more insight into individual lives than the individual running them, that the state can perform all non-violent tasks better by using violence. These ideals are nationalistic or apologetic ideals, not patriotic.
 
ProudAmerican said:
again I will point out, you have NO CLUE if they were a threat.

was al queda a threat on 9-10?1
was Japan a threat on 12-6 ?2


what ability did Al Queda have on 9-10? Im willing to bet on 9-10 you would have thought a rag tag group of unorganized thugs with no army had no chance to harm America.

you would have been just as wrong about them as you are about Iraq.

but keep giving us your unfounded opinion. its fun stuff.

1. Yes
2. Yes
 
Out of curiosity, why did a discussion on the definition of patriotism end up being reconstrution in Iraq?

Patriotism is about the land of our fathers, not the land of someone else's fathers somewhere else.

To often I see examples of situations become the course of a thread.

It's like talking about the North American Great lakes, someone mentions, as filler and an example, Zebra Mussels, and then the topic is southwestern russian folk music.
 
since many of these posts get quite long, and I dont have hours to spend here....I will pick and choose a few to respond to.

forgive me for not responding to everything. Im not avoding , just seriously dont have time. just got in from deer hunting and am going again in the morning.

There are terrorist bombings at funerals for people who were killed in terrorist bombings. Random people are being kidnapped or blown up regularly in the streets.
that was happening long before we went into Iraq. the fact that the terrorists are so determined to run us out tells me it was a good strategic location. and Id rather see it happening there, than in NYC.

There's little to no electricity
the photos billo showed on this site werent exactly of the Hilton, or the Holliday Inn. I think there was "little to no" electricity before we got there for the average guy. Im willing to bet theres more now than before. unless you can prove otherwise.

schools, or economic foundation. Poverty has gotten far worse since our entry. People have to live their lives operating under the understanding that, regardless of what they've done or their stances on anything, they may be killed in a random attack. etc.
I simply dont believe its that bad. I believe progress is being made daily.
Show me these things.
Im willing to bet you simply get this information from negative websites that want to convince us all we cant win over there.
untill you actually go there, and see these horrors firts hand....its nothing more than heresay.

Things were bad under Saddam, they're very clearly worse now.
it is NOT CLEARLY worse now. if it were clearly worse now we wouldnt be having this debate and I would agree with you.

whats clear is that YOU WISH TO BELIEVE IT IS WORSE NOW.
 
I am a Patriot.

How's that to get back on topic?
 
forgive me for derailing the thread.

my apologies.
 
Originally Posted by ProudAmerican
forgive me for derailing the thread.

my apologies.
That's just un-American.

Sorry, couldn't resist.
 
I don't mean to be hall monitor or anything, and I partake in off-topics myself. And I know that sometimes, there are so few good, active threads, that we take what we can get when we can. I just humbly suggest to, if veering off topic, veer back on from time to time.

Any subject that can go off topic, can be brought back on, and even in the context of the off-topic too.
 
Well any way before ya'll get to far off topic.....do you thing patriotism is just brain washing b/c in WWI and WWII everthing the goverment told you people was that we were winning the war even tho we were losing in the begin....the goverment kind of brain was the people of america....what do you'll think about that.....and can terrist in Iraq just be patriotic if this is true to there country?
 
galenrox said:
Oooo, that's a really good question. The short answer would be no, due to our understanding that the word "patriotism" means wanting what's best for your country, and considering our experience with how socialist facist regimes work out, it is impossible to fight for that and be patriotic simultaniously, especially considering that the majority of the terrorists are Sunnis, who are just fighting so that their religious sect can regain its disproportionate amount of control, and working to benefit a party as opposed to benefit the nation is not patriotic (I think both democrats and republicans could learn from that).
The longer answer is more of a hypothetical yes. Hypothetically, if someone actually believed that blowing himself up to attempt to reinstall a sunni regime was the best thing to do for the country, then yes, one could be a terrorist and still be patriotic. That being said, it's the long answer because of the required footnote that patriotism is not always a good thing, because it can sometimes lead to a close minded approach to managing things, and so on and so forth. Patriotism is good when it's love of your own country, and what it stands for, but it's bad when it clouds judgement and is just used as a tool to make people close minded and self righteous.


Wow...I ask like one hundred people that question and got off the wall answer and so far you answered it the best out of all of them! But when some one is patriotic they believe in what they are fighting for? Right....Well terrorist believe in what they are fighting for or they would be fighting us, so there patriotic right?


When some one is patriotic they think they are doing the right things not anything bad…so they are brain washing there self’s by taking out the bad stuff and replacing it with the good stuff……Well Terrorist are doing the same thing…..

How dose that quote go “Once a lie been told may time its no longer a lie it’s the truth”
 
Back
Top Bottom