- Joined
- Jun 3, 2020
- Messages
- 34,664
- Reaction score
- 11,546
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I am demonstrably correct.Again, you are simply wrong.
I am demonstrably correct.Again, you are simply wrong.
this is a proven lieYou are wrong.
Whether you are intentionally lying or simply ignorant, you are wrong.
![]()
Philadelphia stops counting mail-in ballots for the night
Philadelphia has stopped counting mail-in ballots for the night — a move that could skew Tuesday night’s preliminary results in Pennsylvania toward President Trump. Only about 76,000 of…nypost.com
Raving? I'm refuting the moronic claims you keep making. So is everyone else that you are engaging in this thread.What are you raving about now?
It's funny that some people have trouble understanding this because of My Cousin Vinny. I find it rather funny that Giuliani brought up that movie because it basically helps to show why his "evidence" is not worth what he and others claim. The very movie he brought up shows that witnesses can in fact be very wrong, whether eyewitnesses or experts. Each eyewitness was shown why he/she was wrong about parts of their statements (glasses lady needed new glasses because she definitely could not see as well as she thought)(grits guy has no sense of time)(skinny redneck dude had too much in his line of sight to seriously see what he claimed).- An affidavit is nothing more than a statement that a person makes that they believe to be true.
- Other evidence may or may not support the statement in an affidavit.
- When other evidence does not support a persons affidavit statement does not mean the person lied in the affidavit. It just means what they stated is what they believe happened is wrong.
Team Trump needs to do more than spout "affidavits". The State/County have demonstrated the vote was correct.
" Although witnesses can often be very confident that their memory is accurate when identifying a suspect, the malleable nature of human memory and visual perception makes eyewitness testimony one of the most unreliable forms of evidence.
The Trouble with Eyewitness Identification Testimony in Criminal Cases | Trends (ncsc.org)
Why Science Tells Us Not to Rely on Eyewitness Accounts - Scientific American
You weren’t present nor bothered to read any of the 60 court cases in which the Trump legal team didn’t charge fraud, and were thrown out, BUT you have certainly read the literally thousands of complaints and can confirm they are substantially proven true?
This is the problem with this conversation in general: ya’ll just keep insisting your made up bullshit needs to stand in place of real world things that took place.
Lou Dobbs had to run an entire segment on his show the other night written by Fox’s lawyers retracting every word about the voting machine company because they were about to be sued out of existence. Know why? They can’t prove any of it. None. Nada.
Weird that every time a Trump-facing person is threatened with having to swear by this stuff under oath they croak up.
Which did not happen at the same location as the alleged counting after the watchers had left occurred.
Not a single word or thought about the Texas Case?
Yet completely factual
Like, 60 judges are “politically motivated” but the Gateway Pundit has it cold.
They’re so locked in their OANN and Breitbart bubbles they forget when they talk to non-trumpkins, we think this stuff is just batshit crazy.
That sentence explains it all. Nothing can ever be satisfactory explained to a conspiracy theorist if that explanation tends to disprove their claim because they just know they are right. It is the very nature of being an unbridled conspiracy theorist.
Another concessionConsidering the sliver of facts you hold from the wealth of facts available, I suppose you could legitimately hold that misconception.
Like I said, most of these people could not be charged with perjury because almost all of them are stating nothing but subjective opinions. Your opinion can be wrong but still not be a lie. So no, they are not opening up themselves to charges of perjury because perjury requires that you prove someone lied, not just that they were wrong.
They haven't been explained to your satisfactory level because you wish to believe the conspiracy, not that they weren't telling the truth nor that they did anything wrong or even out of the ordinary.
Did you think the entire Russia, Russia, Russia crap was batcrap crazy?
What are you citing as a different location?
this is a proven lie, as I've already shown you.The toilet was in the sports facility in Georgia in which the counting was stopped.
the counting never stopped, stop lying.The stopped was stopped legally by the officials overseeing the counting.
The video recordings show that the counting continued.
Explain.
this is a proven lie, as I've shown you.The counting was ordered to be stopped by the people overseeing the counting.
the explanation is that you are lying, and have been proven to be lying.The counting continued.
Explain.
Doesn't mean they can. You are making claims that do not match reality to try to bolster how others should believe these affidavits simply because they are claims being made, not because they are actually credible or more than just opinions or personal beliefs.With respect, prosecutors say they can indict a ham sandwich.
Saying that anyone CANNOT be charged with anything seems a bit far fetched. Especially in light of the last 5 year fiasco in our legal systems ongoing abuses.
It wasn't and you have provided no evidence that it actually was (do not even bother posting links to sites like gatewaypundit or other alt right sources, I am not going to take their word on it).The counting was ordered to be stopped by the people overseeing the counting.
The counting continued.
Explain.
The stadard of evidence was that no evidence of ANY Alien visit has ever been presented.
Here is evidence that 4 dead people voted.
<snip>![]()
MORE Dead Voters Caught Voting in Michigan -- Many Are Older than the Oldest Human Alive Today | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
More tricks and fraud.www.thegatewaypundit.com
All 4 of these people are older than the oldest person on the face of the earth. And they voted this cycle. Absentee.
That’s quite a turnout operation!
Here are their names.
Here was the list…
![]()
<snip>
You do understand that "alternative facts" are not actual facts, right?Considering the sliver of facts you hold from the wealth of facts available, I suppose you could legitimately hold that misconception.
It was rejected by the SC. What would you like to discuss about it?
From your last post: I’m still curious how you can insist that we can’t know why all 59 cases were dismissed but you personally know that thousands and thousands of claims have been “proven true”
How?
Did I say "thousands and thousands of claims"?
Another concession
This is too easy