- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,849
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It's the codes for weeks of gestation.
Yep. Thanks
It's the codes for weeks of gestation.
Yep. Thanks
So it doesn't mean anything to your argument. The point still remains that it's not a medical condition and nothing you provided shows otherwise.
Yeah. What other things are in the ICD that are not medical conditions?
Do you know why the codes(which is what they are) are used?
To bill for medical conditions. What else is in the ICD other than medical conditions?
No, they are for sequencing priority. They mean nothing to your argument.
Is my question invisible? And in the US they are used for billing
I already answered your question. Anyway, they are part of the ICD-10 for sequencing priority. How other people decide to use them is another matter.
Nope you are just wrong on this one. The ICD is a list of medical conditions....find anyone but you that says otherwise
I already said what the chapter name was for and what was under it.
Yep. A list of medical conditions. Thanks
Yes, for conditions that could happen during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium. The list itself is the medical conditions, not the chapter names.
Sorry. You lost this one. Good night
I think there is no case to make that it is unconstitutional. You can not single out one group unfairly under the constitution without compelling government interest (14th amendment). Not paying for abortion and paying for vasectomies clearly discriminates against women
Keep it the Hell out of Ohio too. Pondering over the decisions of those states on both coasts of our great country that often turn into plagues that every state in between has to fight like Hell to keep out. G-d I am thankful I live in fly over country.
They are both very effective forms of birth control
What I see is a lot of people who seriously need to mind their own business.
If an unwanted pregnancy happens somewhere, and is born, you're nowhere to be found, it ain't your problem. It's the woman who is a screw up. But ohhhhhh, the poor little fetus, protect it so people who believe as you do will have a reason to ridicule women.
American Medical Association says fetuses at 20 weeks have brain activity and feel pain. Conducted by researchers who have no interest in the abortion debate. I did this research a few years ago. With all the Pro Life and Pro Choice propaganda clogging the net an unbiased source was hard to find. Search yourself if you are honestly curious.
I believe the 26 week weeks comes from Pro Choice propaganda trying to protect Roe V. Wade that allows abortions up to 24 weeks.
As a Libertarian I have no problem with early term abortion. I am just pointing out the facts that I have found.
Pain is an emotional and psychological experience that requires conscious recognition of a noxious stimulus. Consequently, the capacity for conscious perception of pain can arise only after thalamocortical pathways begin to function, which may occur in the third trimester around 29 to 30 weeks’ gestational age, based on the limited data available. Small-scale histological studies of human fetuses have found that thalamocortical fibers begin to form between 23 and 30 weeks’ gestational age, but these studies did not specifically examine thalamocortical pathways active in pain perception.
While the presence of thalamocortical fibers is necessary for pain perception, their mere presence is insufficient—this pathway must also be functional. It has been proposed that transient, functional thalamocortical circuits may form via subplate neurons around midgestation, but no human study has demonstrated this early functionality. Instead, constant SEPs appear at 29 weeks’ PCA, and EEG patterns denoting wakefulness appear around 30 weeks’ PCA. Both of these tests of cortical function suggest that conscious perception of pain does not begin before the third trimester.
I never said women "needed" to monitor their pregnancies, but that women "want" to monitor their pregnancies. As I said, women do not usually require any medical attention during a pregnancy. Heck, they can have birth just about anywhere too. Really, they were having babies in fields well before hospitals came into existence.
I don't think that abortion coverage should be mandated. I would agree to making the "morning after pill" free on demand though.Oregon has now made it MANDATORY for every insurance company to cover abortion (and birth control and vasectomies). I think this is long overdue and we need to repeal the Hyde Amendment and make this nationwide. Thoughts?
I must admit I have no problem killing innocent fetuses. Or innocent viruses for that matter
I am not against abortion, but it is a serious decision to make after careful thought. Not to mention that there are way cheaper forms of birth control. To think of abortion as birth control is just wrong, and many who do not oppose it would agree. To be so cavalier about it is even more disgusting.
I am not against abortion, but it is a serious decision to make after careful thought. Not to mention that there are way cheaper forms of birth control. To think of abortion as birth control is just wrong, and many who do not oppose it would agree. To be so cavalier about it is even more disgusting.
I pity your spiritual afterlife.