As determined by the courts for legal purposes but it is by no means, "the limit" for viability as your own link stated.
"As of 2006, the two youngest children to survive premature birth are thought to be James Elgin Gill (born on 20 May 1987 in Ottawa, Canada, at 21 weeks and 5 days gestational age),[20][21] and Amillia Taylor (born on 24 October 2006 in Miami, Florida, at 21 weeks and 6 days gestational age).[22][23] She was born on 24 October 2006 in Miami, Florida, at 21 weeks and 6 days gestation, as an IVF pregnancy. Both children were born just under 20 weeks from fertilization (or 22 weeks gestation). At birth, Taylor was 9 inches (22.86 cm) long and weighed 10 ounces (283 grams).[22] She suffered digestive and respiratory problems, together with a brain hemorrhage. She was discharged from the Baptist Children's Hospital on 20 February 2007.[22] As of 2013, Taylor was in kindergarten and at the small end of the normal growth curve with some developmental delays.[24]"
I keep running into this illogical position, when talking to pro-choicers. They seem to derive all of their morality from the law. Laws have historically, and demonstratively, been very poor premises to rest one's morality on.
How many immoral laws do you want me to list, that are obviously not moral and based devaluing of various segments of the population? Should I start with women's suffrage?
Let me know if there are any other false statements of yours I can correct and I'll gladly help so you can participate in said intelligent and common ground conversations . You're welcome.
