So you really missed the reference right here to Juan Williams?
And you missed the right wing outrage recently when he was fired for violating his sacred contract?
No, he wasn't.from Phoenix
So Williams was not fired for violating the terms of his contract? When that happened the right wing and the liberty lobby thought it was a huge violation of his rights as an American and screamed like a stuck pig.
Where is your hypocrisy now?Where is their outrage now?
Wait... I know. Its hiding behind their ideological loathing of one of their sworn enemies. Lovers of Liberty!?!?!? humbug.
from Phoenix
So Williams was not fired for violating the terms of his contract? When that happened the right wing and the liberty lobby thought it was a huge violation of his rights as an American and screamed like a stuck pig.
Where is their outrage now?
Wait... I know. Its hiding behind their ideological loathing of one of their sworn enemies. Lovers of Liberty!?!?!? humbug.
So you really missed the reference right here to Juan Williams?
So Williams was not fired for violating the terms of his contract? When that happened the right wing and the liberty lobby thought it was a huge violation of his rights as an American and screamed like a stuck pig.
Where is their outrage now?
BS: he was fired for his behavior on election night; but they didn't want to say that.
:lol: perhaps Alan Grayson is looking to fill a slot.
I kind of believe that big business trying to restrict your rights in exchange for a job is just as wrong as the government trying to restrict your rights.
Should companies be allowed to force employees to suck the boss's dick or some other sexual favor to get a promotion or to keep a job,
force employees to wear ankle monitoring devices while not on the job
be forced to have chip implants
totally give up your constitutional rights while off the job.
Where does it end?
After all you do not have a right to a job so by your logic your boss can force you perform sexual favors on his 97 year old grandma who thinks you're hot so you can keep your job or get a promotion.
My complete lack of faith in anyone proclaiming themselves as a lover and defender of liberty while pushing a right wing conservative agenda at the same time is totally and completely validated by the sanctimonious double talk and bending over backwards evidenced by this response.
Its almost worth a short suspension of Olbermann.
Almost.
This is about the internet messengers of the right wing gloating and rejoicing in the removal of a huge pain in their ass.
My complete lack of faith in anyone proclaiming themselves as a lover and defender of liberty while pushing a right wing conservative agenda at the same time is totally and completely validated by the sanctimonious double talk and bending over backwards evidenced by this response.
Its almost worth a short suspension of Olbermann.
Almost.
This is about the internet messengers of the right wing gloating and rejoicing in the removal of a huge pain in their ass.
What right was violated? What right? Please name one.Why should any American have to put aside their rights as a citizen to privately participate in the supporting of candidates in exchange for a job? Such a clause in any contract - signed or otherwise - should be ruled as a violation of the Constitution.
Of course that would mean taking on the power of the corporation and we know how the liberty lobby feels about that. Besides, its the hated Keith Olbermann who has said tons of nasty things bout republicans and libertarians.
Why should any American have to put aside their rights as a citizen to privately participate in the supporting of candidates in exchange for a job?
Such a clause in any contract - signed or otherwise - should be ruled as a violation of the Constitution.
Why should any American have to put aside their rights as a citizen to privately participate in the supporting of candidates in exchange for a job?
Such a clause in any contract - signed or otherwise - should be ruled as a violation of the Constitution.
Grim - you do realize that such things can indeed be ruled illegal in the future because of actions like this one don't you?
As what rights of his were violated: does a citizen have a right to support candidates of their choice in their private life?
Has not the US Supreme Court said that the donation of money to a candidate is an exercise of ones rights?
On October 7th, in reference to the Fox News donations, Olbermann asked House Majority Whip James Clyburn if there is a legislative response available when a cable news network "goes beyond having a point of view and actually starts to shill for partisan causes and actually starts to donate to partisan groups of one party."
If you believe this B.S. you still think Obama is smarter than a fifth grader.
Olbermann if actually is not getting paid it will be for poor ratings because he's a damn fool and not because of anything else.
Olbermann and his gay pal Matthews have always done nothing but follow orders of the network and bash anyone who is not and Obama worshiper.
Hell they keep Matthews on the air and he came out of the closet live on the air.
I wonder how his cover wife took the news, or has she known he was gay all along. I mean he did talk about Howard Deans arms before.
This is a bogus story, and Olbermann will be back unless they can get someone else who will get better ratings.
As what rights of his were violated: does a citizen have a right to support candidates of their choice in their private life?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?