Maybe to you. Funny you'd spend so much time on it.
THat wasnt the question though. You implied that you are not going to go there 'anymore' as a result of this action, but then you say there is nothing wrong with this action. So why are you stating your intention to boycott them?
How come conservatives never see a middle ground between "ignore the problem" and "federally mandated food portioning?"
I've been boycotting BurgerKing for several years now because they did a major menu revamp.
The issue at hand is that companies are leaving to countries with lower taxes. What US companies ACTUALLY pay is irrelevant...what is relevant is that they pay more than they would were they are moving. So, yes, your quibbling over what they actually pay is irrelevant.
Just grind up the dead fat people. It's more economical by the pound than elderly corpses and more nutritious.
Yes to you. I think you've overstated your opinion on it.
Don't be ridiculous.
Fat people are where the heating oil is going to come from.
Corporations can spend money and contribute to political campaigns. It's not the personal individuals, as they are covered separately. Corporate monies are used, corporations can pay America for their access to our government.
According to US law, Corporations are people with all the same rights and responsibilities.
Once again, the STATUTORY corporate tax-rate is the highest in the world. The amount of taxes, after deductions and credits, is not. (see: GAO: Effective Tax Rates Can Differ Significantly from the Statutory Rate) In fact, many profitable corporations pay no taxes.As usual, a Dumbocrat misses the point.
How about lowering the Corporate Tax rate, Brownie? Maybe if it wasn't the highest in the industrialized world, Burger King wouldn't be looking to leave the US.
So you think it's fine that you now have to make up the taxes that BK avoids? How civic-minded of you.I took my kids to Burger King last night after I collected them all from soccer practice. I never did that before but I felt the need to do it last night.
In your face, Brown.
So you think it's fine that you now have to make up the taxes that BK avoids? How civic-minded of you.
So you think it's fine that you now have to make up the taxes that BK avoids? How civic-minded of you.
So you think it's fine that you now have to make up the taxes that BK avoids? How civic-minded of you.
No, I don't support intentionally trying to financially hurt innocent people. Apparently you think it's good.
How liberal of you.
The C-Corporation is the single worst tax structure to be in in the US and internationally its taxed by the US government in a way that gives a strong disincentive to ensure that the US C-Corp will not be the 'hub' of a multinational corporation.
You have to understand that it is a CEO's responsibility to reduce tax payments if possible. It is part of his job and duty to the shareholders. The U.S. is in competition with other countries economically. It always has been. So it needs to understand that the high corporate tax rate (which is eventually paid by you and me anyway) will cause some companies to move. Quite a few companies have left California for states with lower taxes as well.
The government needs to decide what pays better - higher corporate taxes and fewer companies to pay them or vice versa. It is a classic business decision. Boycotts won't change it. If the government wants to reduce inversion then it needs to have a competitive tax rate for businesses. Pretty simple.
While it may be the CEO's responsibility to reduce tax payments, it's is not our responsibility to enable them by frequenting BK more, as a reward for moving their HQ abroad, as tres borrachos did.
While it may be the CEO's responsibility to reduce tax payments, it's is not our responsibility to enable them by frequenting BK more, as a reward for moving their HQ abroad, as tres borrachos did.
I believe it is the best option for companies with less than $70K in net profit.
While it may be the CEO's responsibility to reduce tax payments, it's is not our responsibility to enable them by frequenting BK more, as a reward for moving their HQ abroad, as tres borrachos did.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?