Official: Some Clinton emails too damaging to release

[Chainsaw]

Even the whiniest douche-bag liberals will admit she broke the law.....NO QUESTION. But in the same breath they contend she should not be held accountable to the LAW!!!!! FACT!!!!!!!!! What a worthless bunch of low-life no-character, no-integrity douche-bags that make up the Democratic leadership.

 

[cpwill]

The Clinton camp is become ever more brazen in the hope that the party faithful (Los Stupidos) will remain loyal.
Read more: 2016 election: Hillary Clinton campaign accuses GOP of 'coordinated leak' in email scandal - POLITICO

That's awesome. The IC IG who was chosen and nominated by President Obama and confirmed overwhelmingly by Democrat Senators, is a secret Republican operative. Right. :lol:

 

[Skeptic Bob]

wonder if the white house looked like this


and now back to the discussion about hillary's pending indictment. i'll drink to that

"Will the owner of a white station wagon please go **** yourself?"

I haven't laughed that hard in a while.

 

[Frank Apisa]

That might make her look even more guilty to a lot of people. They might wonder why, if these communications were so secret the government can't even reveal what was said, she was handling them so carelessly. The average person does not need to know the identities and itineraries of covert U.S. agents overseas, for example, to know that it is intolerable for the Secretary of State or any other senior official with access to that information not to be fastidious--always--about following established procedures for safeguarding it.

You can bet your life that there are no documents in there that give the identities or itineraries of any covert operators. That is a fantasy from a bad dream.

Most of the Top Secret stuff is probably material that has been published in newspapers.

 

[Erod]

You can bet your life that there are no documents in there that give the identities or itineraries of any covert operators. That is a fantasy from a bad dream.

Most of the Top Secret stuff is probably material that has been published in newspapers.

And Obama said he knew nothing until he heard it from the media?

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/3...lic.html?referer=http://www.drudgereport.com/

 

[Grant]

And Obama said he knew nothing until he heard it from the media?

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/3...lic.html?referer=http://www.drudgereport.com/

"A spokesman, Brian Fallon, said all of the emails should be released".

There doesn't seem to be much pride left in politics anymore, at least from the Clintons and those associated with them. It's just a disgrace and anyone who defends them is equally disgraceful.

 

[Frank Apisa]

And Obama said he knew nothing until he heard it from the media?

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/3...lic.html?referer=http://www.drudgereport.com/

What on Earth does that comment have to do with anything?

 

[Frank Apisa]

"A spokesman, Brian Fallon, said all of the emails should be released".

There doesn't seem to be much pride left in politics anymore, at least from the Clintons and those associated with them. It's just a disgrace and anyone who defends them is equally disgraceful.

Really!

Well...if you think it is a disgrace to even think about her as being innocent until proven guilty...perhaps you do not understand how things work in this country.

 

[bubbabgone]

Exactly the point. Something like yelling "wolf" over and over and over. At what point do the Fox believers finally quit getting all excited every time?

You sound pretty confident that the wall of stone will hold.
How are you with reading body language?
Watch your girl answer questions about anything related to her emails.
No eye contact ... looks down ... eyes dart side-to-side ... and then it's on to "These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people."

 

[bubbabgone]

"A spokesman, Brian Fallon, said all of the emails should be released".

There doesn't seem to be much pride left in politics anymore, at least from the Clintons and those associated with them. It's just a disgrace and anyone who defends them is equally disgraceful.

Yeah ... he said that ... with a snicker ... and counting on them not being be released.

 

[mak2]

I am confident the Repubs and the RWNM have cried wolf so many times I am not getting my hopes up this time. Hillary is literally the last person I was to see as president. Accusing me of being a Hillary supporter, well lets just say it is misinformed. The RWNM just makes up stuff, the RWers throw it in the machine and repeat it over and over to each other until I think they might really believe it. The Republicans kinda remind me of the Benny Hill show, especially around nomination time.

You sound pretty confident that the wall of stone will hold.
How are you with reading body language?
Watch your girl answer questions about anything related to her emails.
No eye contact ... looks down ... eyes dart side-to-side ... and then it's on to "These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people."

 

[bubbabgone]

I am confident the Repubs and the RWNM have cried wolf so many times I am not getting my hopes up this time. Hillary is literally the last person I was to see as president. Accusing me of being a Hillary supporter, well lets just say it is misinformed. The RWNM just makes up stuff, the RWers throw it in the machine and repeat it over and over to each other until I think they might really believe it. The Republicans kinda remind me of the Benny Hill show, especially around nomination time.

Okay.
You're not a Hillary supporter you just play one on DebatePolitics ... or at least appear to.
Sorry if I jumped to conclusions about who you support, but at some point it would be reasonable to expect even her supporters, the honest ones anyway, would begin to acknowledge that it doesn't look like the old girl has been honest.
Instead they prefer to appear as deadenders who resort to the vast right wing media excuse because they can't explain what has actually been revealed.

 

[matchlight]

Really!

Well...if you think it is a disgrace to even think about her as being innocent until proven guilty...perhaps you do not understand how things work in this country.

That very demanding standard applies in criminal trials--but it will not apply at the polling booth. No American who declines to vote for that scheming leftist liar needs to justify their decision to anyone. That, too, is how things work in this country.

 

[Grant]

Really! Well...if you think it is a disgrace to even think about her as being innocent until proven guilty...perhaps you do not understand how things work in this country.

I understand that any politician who exercised the poor judgement of Hillary Clinton should never never never be considered for public office. To encourage people like the Clinton's only furthers more and greater corruption, which is what happens when people put party in front of the good of the country, and its future.

You don't have to be an American to understand this.

 

[Grant]

Okay.
You're not a Hillary supporter you just play one on DebatePolitics ... or at least appear to.
Sorry if I jumped to conclusions about who you support, but at some point it would be reasonable to expect even her supporters, the honest ones anyway, would begin to acknowledge that it doesn't look like the old girl has been honest.
Instead they prefer to appear as deadenders who resort to the vast right wing media excuse because they can't explain what has actually been revealed.

Those honest Democrats with convictions may have jumped to Bernie's side, from one BSer to another with the same unfortunate initials. Of course many others have done so because they support an open agenda of socialism, rather than the stealth program advanced so far..

 

[Frank Apisa]

That very demanding standard applies in criminal trials--but it will not apply at the polling booth. No American who declines to vote for that scheming leftist liar needs to justify their decision to anyone. That, too, is how things work in this country.

If you want to vote for someone other than Hillary Clinton fine. Do it. That it the way things work.

If you are going to post on an Internet forum that anyone who does not see Hillary Clinton as the disgusting thing you see her to be...is a "disgrace"...you are going to be challenged.

Now don't get me wrong...I love your posts. I relish each of them. You show what I want shown in the people who oppose her. You do more good for my thinking than you can possibly imagine...although I suspect there are people who want very much for Hillary Clinton to be out of public altogether...who cringe when they see what you write and how you phrase your thoughts.

But I, Matchlight...actually look forward to them.

 

[Frank Apisa]

I understand that any politician who exercised the poor judgement of Hillary Clinton should never never never be considered for public office. To encourage people like the Clinton's only furthers more and greater corruption, which is what happens when people put party in front of the good of the country, and its future.

You don't have to be an American to understand this.

If you think that...go with it.

We do have a philosophy of innocent until proven guilty. American conservatives have demonized people like Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama in so many bizarre ways...their nonsense has become comedy.

 

[iguanaman]

If you think that...go with it.

We do have a philosophy of innocent until proven guilty. American conservatives have demonized people like Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama in so many bizarre ways...their nonsense has become comedy.

I take solace that this pitiful display of desperation by Republicans means we have the right candidate. Why else would they be so scared of her that they will go to any lengths to discredit her character? Their clown car of candidates is so poor that they have no choice but to go after Hillary.

 

[matchlight]

If you want to vote for someone other than Hillary Clinton fine. Do it. That it the way things work.

If you are going to post on an Internet forum that anyone who does not see Hillary Clinton as the disgusting thing you see her to be...is a "disgrace"...you are going to be challenged.

Now don't get me wrong...I love your posts. I relish each of them. You show what I want shown in the people who oppose her. You do more good for my thinking than you can possibly imagine...although I suspect there are people who want very much for Hillary Clinton to be out of public altogether...who cringe when they see what you write and how you phrase your thoughts.

But I, Matchlight...actually look forward to them.

What you or anyone else who supports that Marxist liar thinks of how I phrase my comments about her does not interest me. Nor do I care what good I do for your thinking. And any leftist dim bulb who wants to challenge me on any subject I write about is free to lace on the gloves and step into the ring.

 

[Frank Apisa]

I take solace that this pitiful display of desperation by Republicans means we have the right candidate. Why else would they be so scared of her that they will go to any lengths to discredit her character? Their clown car of candidates is so poor that they have no choice but to go after Hillary.

Seems to me if she were as weak a candidate as many are claiming she is...they would touting her.

But they aren't...and I suspect for the reasons you mentioned.

 

[Frank Apisa]

What you or anyone else who supports that Marxist liar thinks of how I phrase my comments about her does not interest me. Nor do I care what good I do for your thinking. And any leftist dim bulb who wants to challenge me on any subject I write about is free to lace on the gloves and step into the ring.

Good work! Thanks.

 

[justabubba]

I take solace that this pitiful display of desperation by Republicans means we have the right candidate. Why else would they be so scared of her that they will go to any lengths to discredit her character? Their clown car of candidates is so poor that they have no choice but to go after Hillary.

here's a couple of reasons why i cannot agree

rand paul and kasich would both make excellent presidents; something that cannot be said of hillary

and

by eliminating hillary as a white house contender results in a MUCH more progressive candidate who is also found to be that rare honest politician. sanders on the ticket will create greater voter demo turnout whereas hillary's candidacy would have the opposite effect

 

[iguanaman]

here's a couple of reasons why i cannot agree

rand paul and kasich would both make excellent presidents; something that cannot be said of hillary

and

by eliminating hillary as a white house contender results in a MUCH more progressive candidate who is also found to be that rare honest politician. sanders on the ticket will create greater voter demo turnout whereas hillary's candidacy would have the opposite effect

And that is why the Republicans are virtually silent about Sanders? He is the candidate they want to run against because they will crucify him for being a Socialist in the general. Sanders will campaign with Hillary and do all he can to help her win. Don't forget that. She may also put Sanders in her cabinet. We can have the best of both.

 

[Grant]

Really! Well...if you think it is a disgrace to even think about her as being innocent until proven guilty...perhaps you do not understand how things work in this country.

This is not a trial. It is an election for the highest office in the land and therefore demands that people look at her actions and her words to consider their support.

Hillary Clinton, as history makes clear, lacks good judgement, has a history of lying, and has had no real success outside of marrying Bill Clinton. She is abundantly unqualified to be president and why that is not clear to everyone remains a mystery. That you think a politician must be tried and found guilty before being declared unfit for public office doesn't say much for your own judgement either.

 

[Grant]

Yeah ... he said that ... with a snicker ... and counting on them not being be released.

Oh absolutely. He can pretend to take the high road in all of this, as well as be willing to release Top Secret information. Of course Hillary had no qualms about them being discovered (as they probably were), or didn't understand what Top Secret meant, or didn't understand that there were some issues that should be Top Secret. No matter how you slice it Hillary and her handlers appear to have no personal pride or character whatsoever.