- Joined
- Nov 7, 2012
- Messages
- 7,039
- Reaction score
- 3,268
- Location
- Denio Junction
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
As if Obama's the first president to fight a proxy war.
and we had CIA in Benghazi with a warehouse full of weapons that some they claim was stolen were these the weapons they were funneling to Syria? is this what the cover up in the Benghazi attack was meant to hide?CIA-funded weapons begin to reach Syrian rebels - CNN.com
If you notice the date, and the link in the story to the Washington Post who's story is not dated (interesting) this regime (administration) armed terrorist on or before 9/12/2013. This president signed an executive order waiving a federal law for himself on the 16th or 17th of September. The federal law forbids the arming of terrorist groups and is a crime that warrants life in prison.
How can one waive a law they already violated? It's time to remove this felon from office and lock him up for life!
CIA-funded weapons begin to reach Syrian rebels - CNN.com
If you notice the date, and the link in the story to the Washington Post who's story is not dated (interesting) this regime (administration) armed terrorist on or before 9/12/2013. This president signed an executive order waiving a federal law for himself on the 16th or 17th of September. The federal law forbids the arming of terrorist groups and is a crime that warrants life in prison.
How can one waive a law they already violated? It's time to remove this felon from office and lock him up for life!
and we had CIA in Benghazi with a warehouse full of weapons that some they claim was stolen were these the weapons they were funneling to Syria? is this what the cover up in the Benghazi attack was meant to hide?
Reagan frowns on your suggestion he can't arm terrorists.
I would also like to point out that Obama signed only one executive order in September 2013, which was "CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES." And the one before that was "Prohibiting Certain Imports of Burmese Jadeite and Rubies"
Executive Orders | The White House
Sorry to ruin your story with facts.
CIA-funded weapons begin to reach Syrian rebels - CNN.com
If you notice the date, and the link in the story to the Washington Post who's story is not dated (interesting) this regime (administration) armed terrorist on or before 9/12/2013. This president signed an executive order waiving a federal law for himself on the 16th or 17th of September. The federal law forbids the arming of terrorist groups and is a crime that warrants life in prison.
How can one waive a law they already violated? It's time to remove this felon from office and lock him up for life!
If we couldn't impeach the gipper for the the Iran-Contra affair, what makes you think that this is an impeachable offense?:2wave:
i would like to know how obama believes he can prohibit imports, since that is a delegated power of congress, not the president.
This isn't the first time he's blatantly ignored the law and it won't be the last. If he doesn't give a **** about our constitution, why would he care about our laws?
Is that really what you're saying to this? "Oh, well others have done similar things, so whatever".
If I were to do such a thing I'd be thrown in jail for the rest of my life. I want to know why government officials can blatantly ignore our laws while we're held to them.
No, I'm saying if you want to complain about presidents breaking these laws then you should also take issue with JFK for instance. My point is, instead of directing this at a specific person, it should be directed at the general practice of presidents breaking laws.
I was wondering the same thing, perhaps you should read the order and google the laws it cites as giving the President authority to act in this fashion.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
National Emergencies Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE (Junta's Anti-Democratic Efforts) Act of 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Plus other sources cited in that particular EO.
CIA-funded weapons begin to reach Syrian rebels - CNN.com
If you notice the date, and the link in the story to the Washington Post who's story is not dated (interesting) this regime (administration) armed terrorist on or before 9/12/2013. This president signed an executive order waiving a federal law for himself on the 16th or 17th of September. The federal law forbids the arming of terrorist groups and is a crime that warrants life in prison.
How can one waive a law they already violated? It's time to remove this felon from office and lock him up for life!
Ah, so more an argument towards the system as a whole for allowing such a thing. I can get on board with that.
i would like to know how obama believes he can prohibit imports, since that is a delegated power of congress, not the president.
you should read the federalist papers #45 by madison.
The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.
delegated powers are congress....... not the president
Do you really know anything about the Iran-Contra affair, who broke the news, what went on, who we know for sure was in on it and who was not...for instance??If we couldn't impeach the gipper for the the Iran-Contra affair, what makes you think that this is an impeachable offense?:2wave:
I'm not trying to defend it, I know literally nothing about the Burmese jade trade. I just thought it was an interesting question that you asked because I thought the same thing, so I went and did some research.
But Congress does have the power to delegate some of its authority to the President, in what's known as an "Enabling Act" named so because it "enables" the President to do something. Typically these are crisis based laws, meant only to take effect when the fastest reaction possible is required, an example is the War Powers Act. The SCOTUS has held such enabling acts to generally be constitutional, although it has struck down a few that have gone too far.
If we couldn't impeach the gipper for the the Iran-Contra affair, what makes you think that this is an impeachable offense?:2wave:
Reagan frowns on your suggestion he can't arm terrorists.
I would also like to point out that Obama signed only one executive order in September 2013, which was "CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES." And the one before that was "Prohibiting Certain Imports of Burmese Jadeite and Rubies"
Executive Orders | The White House
Sorry to ruin your story with facts.
CIA-funded weapons begin to reach Syrian rebels - CNN.com
If you notice the date, and the link in the story to the Washington Post who's story is not dated (interesting) this regime (administration) armed terrorist on or before 9/12/2013. This president signed an executive order waiving a federal law for himself on the 16th or 17th of September. The federal law forbids the arming of terrorist groups and is a crime that warrants life in prison.
How can one waive a law they already violated? It's time to remove this felon from office and lock him up for life!
Who's the modern day Ollie North to fall on their sword to protect the President?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?